And be informed.
And see the delusional left continue to claim that "Bush lied", when he apparently told the truth, which I knew all along.
I mean, what kind of idiot would've believed that Saddam Hussein hadn't had weapons of mass destruction? It's as believeable as any contention that Hitler had none, or that the Soviet Union had none, or that China, North Korea and Iran have none, or any contention that although they might have some, they wouldn't ever dare use them offensively rather than defensively.
If the left wants to continue to act like airheaded zombies, let 'em. Let 'em march down the street bareassed all they want. No one will pay them any attention, except perhaps the New York Times, Dan Rather, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Ward Churchill, Noam Chomsky and all those spittling, foaming-at-the-mouth moonbats ad infinitum...
I'd opt for the course of safety and security via proactivity and prevention rather than the left's blissful ignorance and wearing of rose-colored glasses in the presence of evil.
See also:
Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq
Isn't it astonishing that leftists continue to desperately want to believe that there were no WMDs in Iraq? Is their desire to make Bush look bad so all-encompassing that they'd literally let Saddam's regime get off scot-free?
They don't care that there is actually a declassified defence document detailing WMD findings in Iraq.
Contrast that to their readiness to believe anything Michael Moore would say about Iraq and about Bush... with little more than some video clips of some folks giving out-of-context opinions and such?
Stupid, boneheaded leftists! Why can't they understand? Or should I ask why won't they?
(Link fixed) More information: Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
(that piece is from 2004)... read it!
Also: Intel Summary Confirms CNSNews.com Reporting on WMDs ... read it!
Excerpt:
Tim Graham is director of media analysis for the Media Research Center, the parent organization of Cybercast News Service. He believes newspaper and television reporters -- who have been repeating "the Democrats' talking point that there were no weapons of mass destruction" as an undisputed fact -- now have an obligation to pursue the new evidence.
"If the press is interested in finding facts first and letting the chips fall where they may, then they all should be reporting this," Graham said. "They don't have to say 'we've found the truth and Bush was right,' but it's incumbent upon the media now to investigate this."
Are the leftists listening? Or are they too content to keep their heads firmly planted up inside their ani?
