Dumb Dems Plot Weird, Stupid, Dishonest 2010 Campaign

WND has come across this bizarre plan by the Obamacrats.

The Obamacrats, who are incredibly out of touch with reality and full of shee-it.

The Obamacrats, who never know what they're talking about.

They're trying to delusionally divide the Republican party into "moderates" (ie. those who are actually "Democrat" plants, spies, etc. in the Republican Party and who go along with everything the Dems do) on the one hand, and, on the other, those who want smaller governemt, lower taxes, and all those things that MOST AMERICANS want.  Of course, the extremist, neo-Communist "Democrats" shamelessly smear not only the latter, but also the majority of Americans, as "extremists".  No doubt the word "teabaggers" will be used, too.  No doubt there'll be some suggestions that the majority of Americans are, via those who represent them, somehow equal to Hitler.  Oh, yes... the "Democrats" will say and do anything to win to pursue their agenda of destroying America the Great.  Yes, that's the kind of inglorious basturds the "Democats" are!

In fact, they're going to call those who represent MOST AMERICANS "birthers".  Oh, not necessarily directly, but slickly packaged into stupid questions to be hurled at them publicly, questions which, I'm sure, the Big Old Media will pick up on for the purpose of cornering Republicans on stuff I thought the Dems said they didn't want to talk about, didn't care about.

The Dems are planning to wage a campaign of asking irrelevant, silly questions that don't matter, or that, at least, they said don't matter.

Politico reported Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chief Robert Menendez is distributing a memo to U.S. Senate campaign offices stating Democrats need to demand that their opponents answer a series of questions, including, "Do you believe that Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen?"

The report said Menendez wants to use the questions to "frame" opponents and "drive a wedge" between moderates belonging to the GOP and those who have adopted the tea party standards advocating limited government, lower taxes, fewer regulations and more freedom for Americans.

The Democrat memo said, "Given the pressure Republican candidates feel from the extreme right in their party, there is a critical – yet time-sensitive – opportunity for Democratic candidates.

"We have a finite window when Republicans candidates will feel susceptible to the extremists in their party. Given the urgent nature of this dynamic, we suggest an aggressive effort to get your opponents on the record."

In other words, the Obamacras plan to run a radical, extremist, militant, revolutionary Alinskyist campaign.  A radical campaign by radicals whose only rules are those of radicalism. And they're the pot calling the kettle "extremist".  No doubt the racist New Black Panther thugs, the criminal ACORNies and violently-racist, neo-Communist SEIU red, pink, purple and brownshirts will be marching the streets equating Republicans and Independents to Hitler and the Nazis.  Of course they will.  They always do.  Just watch 'em!  You'll also notice, as, at least reported on Zombie Time , that some of them are naked, perhaps, bizarrely, crazily inflating their ballsacks for the hell of it, taking advantage of the public spectacle crap.  Yes, these are the kinds of nutcase extremists the "Democrats" and Obama actually represent, not Mainstream Americana at all, whom they, hypocritically, smear as "extremist".

Well, I don't think that Republicans have any lessons to take from Democrats, MOST of whom are themselves extreme, no doubt.

I don't think that Republicans have any lessons to take from people who are racist, who believe in the mass slaughter of innocoent human beings, who believe in destroying America, who believe in slandering and smearing Mainstream Americana...

...and who believe that Barack Hussein Obama somehow, but without evidence to justify this belief, must necessarily (of course- what're you, a crazy, wacko conspiracy theorist birther racist- of course it must necessarily be true, because everyone says it is!) have actually proven beyond all doubt that he's eligible to be President according to the very strict and specific rules in the Eligibility Clause of the US Constitution.

Like, someone once said, TRUST BUT VERIFY.  Hey, don't forget the VERIFY part.  It's a matter of national security, remember?

If the Obamacrats want to keep raising the question (I thought there wasn't supposed to be any!) of Obama's eligibility for office (of course, they'll ask the silly "is he a citizen" question, which is irrelevant, and moot, in the face of the "Natural-Born" requirement!!!), then let them do it.  It'll raise the profile and lead to further discussion amongst Mainstream American Voters!

When the Obamacrat Goebellists ask those stupid questions, I recommend that Republicans and Independents return fire in a far more devastating way, with the following question, not bothering to dignify the Goebellists' questions with a direct response:

"DO YOU BELIEVE THAT WE MUST ALL, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT OR SUPPOSED OR POTENTIAL PRESIDENT, SCRUPULOUSLY, PAINSTAKINGLY, HONESTLY OBEY THE CONSTITUTION... OR THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS, INCORRECTLY AND INSANELY, AS YOUR CLAIMED "PRESIDENT" AND YOUR MAJORITY-EXTREMIST FACTIONS SAY, 'A LIVING, INCONVENIENT, OUTDATED DOCUMENT WHICH CAN BE AMENDED IMMEDIATELY AT OUR CONVENIENCE AND WITHOUT ADHERENCE TO ANY CONSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL, DEMOCRATIC, ETC. PROCEDURES', WHICH EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS NOT?"

That question-in-response-to-a-stupid-question (who the feck's doubting Obama's citizenship, as opposed to simply wanting to see valid proof, ie. the original, authentic, paper, long-form birth certificate which Obama's, apparently illegally, blown two million dollars on legal warriors, keeping it away from legitimately inquiring eyes and minds) that he actually obeys the Constitution and isn't a treasonous, foreign-born extremist enemy felon fraudulently occupying the White House, proceeding with plans to destroy America as we know her, destroying America's greatness and world leadership in spreading freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights worldwide, and contemptuously throw patriotic, Constitution-obeying Americans into the garbage?) must be used, unless the Republicans plan to repeat the suicidal throw-in-the-towel-and-let-the-other-guy-murder-us plan of the foolish McCainites, and let the Obamacrats continue to destroy America without the informed, willing consent of the American People...

Via Obama mentor Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:

"Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing." p.6

"A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage -- the political paradise of communism." p.10

"An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations...." pp.10-11

That's whom we're dealing with.    

These extremists, these enemies of Amerca, enemies of the American People, enemies of freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights... must be defeated in this obvious civil war. 

Do we want people like these to be in power in the Free World? 

Can clowns rule the world without destroying it?

Do we want someone like this in charge?

 

That's Cal Lightman representing The American People, daring the Dems to lie.

They can't fool the People of the Light. 

They are being watched closely by their biggest skeptics!

No more Big Lies!

Throw the Reich bums out!

Also via WND:

One participant in a forum at New Jersey.com said the Democrats obviously just don't understand the level of concern Americans have.

"Menendez you are so far out of touch you have no idea of what you talk about. You don't even know what the tea [party] movement stands for. You somehow think they are all right wing conservatives. How wrong you are. They are from every walk of life from all parties and none. They represent everything good in this country and what has made us great. Thats (sic) something you and yours will never understand. All you know is take take take and spend spend spend. Thats (sic) what the teabager movement wants to stop."

The Obamacrats will probably focus, hypocritically, mind y'all, on the slight errors in spelling, forgetting that many of their own ilk can't even spell their own states' names properly!  So, really, they're no better than Mainstream Americana!

Yeah, I know... I'm giving the Obamacrats a taste of their own medicine.  I'm hitting quite... HARD.

But, hey, when the Free World is threatened, when just one nation in the Free World is threatened, WE  CANADIANS WILL BE THERE FOR YOU AND YOU CAN COUNT ON US!

As I fight for freedom in Canada, I also join your fight for yours.

Because FREEDOM KNOWS NO BORDERS!

IPCC In Big Trouble

Of course, they brought it upon themselves.  They couldn't stow their craps for too long.

Canadian "climate scientist" Andrew Weaver is sounding what could be interpreted as a death knell for the IPCC, a creature of the corrupted-by-evil United Nations.

The interesting thing is that he's been one of the Big Liars, one of the Screaming Chicken (nope, not the big birdies on the Firebird Trans Am hoods!) Littles pretending to be "scientists".

He's never, ever been a "denier".  Quite the opposite.  That's a problem for his comrades.

He seems to have seen the light, had an epiphany, as it were.

That Mr. Weaver now thinks it necessary to set himself up as the voice of scientific reason, and as a moderate guardian of appropriate and measured commentary on the state of the world's climate, is firm evidence that the IPCC is in deep trouble. He's getting out while the getting's good, and blaming the IPCC's upper echelon for the looming crisis.

In the language typical of an IPCC report, one might say that the radiative forcing created by Climategate and Glaciergate strongly suggest this is very likely to bring about cataclysmic melting of the organization within the next portion of the current decadal period. The words "very likely" in IPCC risk assessment terms mean a 90% or greater probability that something will happen. As it looks now, the IPCC is burnt toast and unless it is overhauled fast there's a 90% probability the climate-change political machine is going to come crashing down.

Hmm.  Shades of the meltdown of the Evil Empire, the Soviet Union.

And of the United Socialist States of Obamerica (which is why They The People must get rid of those Obamacrooks as soon as freaking possible!).

Mr. Weaver's acknowledgement that Climategate -- the release/leak/ theft of thousands of incriminating emails from a British climate centre showing deep infighting and number manipulation -- demonstrates a problem is real news in itself. When Climategate broke as a story last November, Mr. Weaver dismissed it as unimportant and appeared in the media with a cockamamie story about how his offices had also been broken into and that the fossil-fuel industry might be responsible for both Climategate and his office break-in.

Definitely a stunning reversal.  Stunning and staggering.  WTF!   First he, like many of his comrades 'n' cronies, lied to our faces on TV.  Now he's admitting to the truth.

A confession, it is.  A pre-emptive plea-bargain to save his ass, as he now sees the future more clearly.  Undeniable reality slapped his face, hard, and he's jumping ship as he sees the (admittedly growing, not melting) iceberg approaching...  Talk about smartening up.  He sees the writing on the wall, can read the tea leaves, etc...

Expect more like him to follow.   


This is how "great" organizations collapse!

The latest IPCC fiasco looks even more damaging. In the 2007 IPCC report that Mr. Weaver said revealed climate change to be a barrage of intergalactic ballistic missiles, it turns out one of those missiles -- a predicted melting of the Himalayan ice fields by 2035 -- was a fraud. Not an accidental fraud, but a deliberately planted piece of science fiction. The IPCC author who planted that false Himalayan meltdown said the other day "we" did it because "we thought ... it will impact policy makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action."

Ah... see?  They lie!  A LOT!

Yet more lies exposed.  Yet more fake "scientists" exposed lying.

Every day, more is exposed.  I honestly can't even keep up with it all, and this should tell you how much, how quickly, is coming out of the skeleton closet.

Question for Hard-Left "intellectuals":

Is it really lying if you're lying about "going along with" people who are lying?

Or is it being smart and doing the right thing the only way it possibly can be done?  I can see PM Harper's strategy here:  Play along whilst the liars shoot their feet so full of holes that they fall down and we no longer have to play along.  This is why Stephen Harper is perhaps the greatest Prime Minister in Canadian History... he's smart enough to "play the game" and still do the right thing.  Weaker leaders (and it appears that there are many out there) would've just either submitted completely to the propaganda and pressure or had militated completely against the whole thing (and, owing to their lack of understanding of how to patiently play the game to survive to do the right thing, probably would've been removed from power by usurping fools), but Harper did what had to be done, like it or not.  One thing he isn't is a "liar", I'm sorry to say to Hard-Left "intellectuals".

It isn't a lie if you are being properly disingenous when pretending to be going along with an actual lie.  It's politics, and sometimes that's how politics is done.  It's got to be done, too.

How can one be lying if one's lying about believing a lie?

Yep.  That's how smart Stephen Harper is.  He knows how to make things work for the better even when it looks like they're going to go down the tubes.  If it involves "playing the game", then so be it; can't avoid it.  It's the reality of the world, and of politics.  Only fools believe that politics can be turned into something utopian.

Ok, time to get a little ranty and personal, but you may find it worthwhile reading, as it, I believe, does have some germaneness vis-a-vis the topic...

Anyway, I've got three..., nope, four, incandescents burning as we speak, and I frankly don't see how that possibly could cause polar bear deaths, or cause icebergs to melt.  Besides, I hate fluorescent light- it causes headaches, crappy moods, and is bad for your skin.  And if you break 'em, you might get mercury poisoning, too, though not enough to kill you right away, but any amount can cause harm, like, for example, to your brain, which begs the question:  Do the global warmists break a lot of CFL bulbs and breathe in the airborne mercury?  That'd explain the shocking mental disorder with which my childhood idol David Suzuki has suddenly come down.

Speaking of David Suzuki and why I thought so highly of him as a child as I watched The Nature of Things...

He sounded so calm, authorative, rational... as a child, one does tend to believe adults who sound like they know what they're talking about (though they don't always, of course).  I was unable to find a deceptive bone in him.  Of course, I was just a little guy then, and was essentially programmed at that time to believe everything the first adult told me.

My, but how I've changed, forced to do so each and every time reality slapped me in the face and forced me to acknowledge the inconvenient and painful truths as they became apparent.

No longer am I impressed by soothing, authorative tones (of course, now, at least until I finally get one of those Star-Trek's-Borg-reminiscent implants -as did Rush Limbaugh, with whom I obviously identify-, being unable to hear people as they speak, and having to rely on lipreading and on face-reading, on body language and on analysis of actual content, etc., I'm immune to manipulative delivery tones, immune to the Pied Pipers of the World, and I believe that makes a lot of difference in my case).  Not that I'd think that these soothing, rational tones are still coming from David "throw 'em all in jail" Suzuki!  Oh, and by the way, I'm advised that I actually lack tone.  That's because I forgot about the whole "tone" thing whilst focussing on pronunciation, logic, reason and on making sense.   Guess I sound like the Terminator or something, eh!

Reminds me of Obama, He of the Golden Tongue.  I'm sure that if I was again four years old, I'd think the guy was some kind of demigod, like the Left and the Big Old Media apparently do!

But being older and wiser as to the reality of the world and of people, including so-called "authorities", I know better.  I also know the terrible truth about the United Nations, which begat the IPCC.

Suddenly-Caring Big Media Asks Where Money Comes From

I don't recall them asking where the Chretien-Martin folks, nor the Obamacrats, would get money for stuff.

I don't recall them openly wondering where we'd get five billion bucks for the Kelowna Accord.

I don't recall them demanding to know how the fecking hell in the whole wide world we'd be able to pay for Kyoto, Copenhagen, etc... and how the fecking hell we'd be able to have any economy at all if we basically stopped using energy to power it in the first place!

Now the Big Media, in this instance the Globe and Mail, wants to know how Canada will be able to come up with the money to help Haiti.  Weird.  I'm used to the Big Old Media not giving a crap, to their assuming that, of course, there'll be money for this and that, and that anyone who asked questions must've been a conspiracy theorist or a cranky crackpot or a racist or something like that.

What a big turnaround for the Big Old Media!

Hey, I got an idea!  We can get rid of the C"HR"C Liberal-Fascist Star-Chamber-Kangaroo-Kourt and the CBC, and use the money saved to help the People of Haiti!

Did you know that, mind-bogglingly, Canada actually sends aid money to the incredibly, obscenely wealthy economic superpower of Communist China?  WTF?!  Ok, that's another place to get the money!  The SinoCommies don't need it, can reallocate a bit of their gargantuan-and-exponentially-growing Start-A-World-War Preparatory Military Budget to help the Chinese People, and can also pitch in a lot more to help the Haitian People!  The SinoCommies can also shut down its Holocaust Program, its organ-harvesting program, its mass-execution-of-dissidents program, and really, really do some good for both the Chinese and the Haitian People.  But the SinoCommies will not do anything more than required for optics.

And why the feck are we giving money to the PLO?!  Don't be fooled by the fact that their facemen wear suits, smile, shake anybody's hand, and now, euphemistically, call themselves "Fatah" and the "Palestinian Authority" (and terrorist Abu Mazen also calls himself the less-scary-sounding "Mahmoud Abbas").  They're hateful anti-Jew, anti-Israel Islamic Supremacist terrorists, just as they've always been!  That's it!  Take away the money we send to them to preach their horrific Judenhass, propagate their Big-Lies-'N'-Hate campaign against Israel, their brainwashing of children from birth into becoming "shaheeds" (ie. go to Israel and go kaboom!), etc...  And give it to the People of Haiti, who aren't trying to wipe out another People, nor trying to push another country into the sea...

Who's with me on that solution set?  Speak UP!

Somebody tell the folks at the Globe and Mail that, oh, come the feck right on, it's easy.  Especially if the G&M helps with, rather than propagating against, the communications of the government in selling the reallocations.

Negativity.  Doubting Thomasery.

Why are the Big Old Media always like this towards a non-"progressive" government, no matter how good it is?

The Big Old Media are not helping.

PETA: Naked, Pie-In-Face Terrorists Now Want Robot Groundhog

Are they trying to destroy whatever credibility they thought they had remaining?

What's the matter with these clowns?

The other day an American PETA terrorist crossed the border to conduct a pie-in-the-face terrorist act against a Canadian federal Cabinet Minister.

Now they want to replace little furry Pete and Willy with robots?

Yep.  They're mad.

At least they got their way when, in the last Presidential election, they replaced Bush with a robot...

Nothing New About That, Duh!

The notoriously anti-Conservative Toronto (Red) Star is up to its manipulative propaganda tricks again.

They're saying stuff about a "new study" than sounds like an OLD one, what with rehashing the same old, same old Canadians' answers to the same old, same old questions as to how they feel about politics, government, etc.

And it comes as no surprise that W. Kinsella-Goebbels's Emergency Bumwiper is telling us this old crap just after a little fake protest by a few thousand confused, ill-informed Canadians happened against the reviled-no-matter-what-by-the-Star Conservatives.

I see they're citing a "study" by the "Institute of Wellbeing", which, when one examines their website, sounds no different from the very same nonsense we've already heard from the Neo-Communist movement.  Just read the page linked in this paragraph.

For example, they spew the following dogmatic drivel:

Over time, GDP has emerged as a surrogate for wellbeing. That’s a big problem. As a measurement of national income, GDP doesn’t distinguish between activities that are good and those that are bad for our society. Think of GDP as a giant calculator with an addition but no subtraction button. Activities like smoking, drinking to excess, building jails and hiring police to deal with crime, destroying green lands to build sprawling subdivisions, over-harvesting our natural resources to the point of jeopardizing their sustainability, using fossil fuels that pollute our air and heat up our planet – all these activities propel GDP upward.

At the same time, GDP fails to include a host of beneficial activities like the value of unpaid housework, child care, volunteer work and leisure time, because they take place outside of the formal marketplace. Nor does it make subtractions for activities that heat up our planet, pollute our air and waterways, or destroy farmlands, wetlands and old-growth forests. The notion of sustainability – ensuring that precious resources are preserved for future generations – doesn’t enter the equation.

They think that building jails and hiring police to deal with crime, while being positive for the GDP, are somehow bad like smoking and getting drunk.  Why else put them in the same sentence?  Why not add "the sex industry"  to the list?  Of course, they're not going to bash that, as, after all, they're "progressives", and as such they believe that the more fornication there is the better off society is.

They believe in leftist concepts of paying people for doing their own housework, and that raising children is a "job" that ought to be paid, notwithstanding that most folks raise children because it's what they want to do, not something they want to be paid for doing.

They also believe the Big Debunked Lie of Global Warming due to fossil fuel burning.

Sounds like something my Neo-Communist economics professor would say.  And, boy, did he say a lot of stuff like that, as well as making us read exclusively Neo-Communist stuff by the likes of Noam Chomsky and Linda McQuaig.

Yep.  Nice work, Toronto Star.  Excellent, credible source of impartial, unbiased "information".

What's going on here is the same old "let's get the nasty right-wingers!" nonsense coming from the Neo-Communist Hard Left.

Funny how the same folks didn't go after the Liberals like that, and how they're not going after the Obamacrats like that.  Oh, not funny- predictable.  Because they only attack conservative politicians, just for being conservative, not Neo-Communist and Hard-Left dogmatic.

It also sounds like the same kind of communication that would emerge from a George Soros-funded organization such as ACORN:

It recommends ways to increase the influence of citizens' voices in politics, including greater use of citizen assemblies to shape public policy; more civics education in the core school curriculum; making voting easier and accessible; and mentoring programs for "promising leaders from diverse communities" to learn how to organize political campaigns or run for office.

Note, in particular, the bolded passage at the end.  Hmm.  Sound familiar?  It should.  We're all familiar with that "promising leader from a diverse community" who's recently demonstrated that he's just a Hard-Left puppet.  And don't you love the codespeak words, "diverse community"?  Like, u can haz affermativ ackshun!  The better your tan, the more they want you, plus the easier it is to get you to think and do what you're told, and the more you can read a teleprompter, the more they want you.  No experience or competence required.  Willingness to flip the bird, to call Americans "bitter extremist teabaggers clinging to guns and religion", to bow to evil oil sheiks and insult the disabled are definitite assets.  The more "diverse" and compliant, the better.  Big demand for well-tanned, hijabbed-Muslim lesbian folkdancers walking around with a cane!  Sorry, white male Vietnam ex-POWs full of competence and intelligence not wanted.  Nor are white women who wear glasses and who have and love their babies no matter what and who aren't leftists and who like to hunt caribou and want America to be great, as opposed to submissive to the Axis of Evil.

Sounds eerily like ACORN, doesn't it?  Makes one think of George Soros, too, of course.  Or Maurice Strong, the Canuck version thereof (they're in cahoots, along with lemon-maker Malcolm Bricklin, by the way, to make big bucks via China's auto industry & importing cheap Sino-deathtraps-on-wheels, as well as being bigwig Leftist ideologues).

They say Canadians are disaffected and are turning to FaceBook, the internet and so on and so forth.  As if it's all that new.  As if in reaction to the Conservatives (ok, they don't say that directly, but it's obviously implicitly implied, given the timing of the release of the statements and given the Big Media outlet they're using).

Guess what?  We're doing it because we're disaffected, not with politicians only, but also with the Big Old Media and with the Hard-Left propagandist industry!


Why do these idiots think that Mainstream Canadiana/Americana have already turned to the internet, talk radio, internet radio, organizing Tea Parties, abandoning the Big Old Biased Media for the fair and balanced FOX News, which is now Number One in primetime cable?

Duh... it's because the Big Old Media and the Left just lie to us, lie to us, lie to us.  Yep.  We can tell they're lying.  After so many years of being lied to, we've become experts on detecting Big Media and Big Left lies.  They've got a "tell".

Clearly, the "Wellness Institute" is directing its communications towards the Left.

Also, they don't say anything about Canadians' disconnect with the Big Old Media.  Of course, they're not going to shoot their comrades in the foot, now, are they?

Predictably also, they bellyache about the fact that there's, circumstantially, for whatever real-world reason (like maybe fewer women than men actually give a crap about being a politician, perhaps, and are really not interested, and would rather do something else?) fewer women than men in Parliament.  Another Leftist obsession.  You know those folks- they want there to be undemocratic appointments for quota, "equality" and "diversity" purposes.  Leftists don't care about democracy if democracy fails to achieve the goals of the Left.... in which case, they want to push it aside as inconvenient, and then proceed to push forward with their agenda, regardless of what Canadians want.

And they wonder why Canadians are "disconnected".  I'd suggest that the Institute and the Star look into the mirror for part of the answer.

Nothing to see here, folks.  Move on and tell the Leftists to move off!

Next Thing You Know...

...Keith Olbermann, the unhinged Hard-Left propaganda pusher will also declare that Scott Brown IS Hitler.

He's that nuts, that Olbermann.  No wonder the Obamacrats don't call him a "liar", 'cause they love his lies.

Here we go again with totally-gone, Hard-Left moonbattery.  Olbermann said:

In short, in Scott Brown we have an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman and against politicians with whom he disagrees.(...)

Guess he's next gonna be caught wearing a balaclava and holding a sign that says "Brown = Hitler".  Or perhaps he'll call Brown a "reptilian kitten eater".  Or perhaps he'll accuse Brown of "having his pants on the ground".

No wonder MSNBC, that nutty network, keeps him on!

Nothing new, nothing original, coming from his big, stinky mouth.  Just the standard old "homophobic", "racist", "reactionary", "teabagger", "supports violence against women", etc., etc...

Kind of like Janeane ("they're all racists!") Garofalo with a little winky.

I said I'd continue to hit back at the Unhinged Hard Left, so...

Anyway, none of the stuff Olbermann said about Brown (dunno how much of it is true, but what's wrong with being a former nude model, anyway???) can hold a candle in terms of badness to the inconvenient truth about Olbermann's Prophet Obama!

And they said that Coulter, Limbaugh and Beck were nuts?  Hey, guys, look at Keith Olbermann, and go after him, now!

US Airborne Laser Weapon Test Vid Released

Via The Dew Line

Actually, the laser cannon won't just be airborne.  There'll very soon be a Boeing-Oshkosh vehicle carrying the laser.  Makes the Scud launcher look like a Medieval catapult.

Speaking of Dew Lines, below is one of my favorite pix from inside a tent at Cambridge Bay, 1958, basically the very beginning of NORAD... my Dad's the guy on the right, ex-Coast Guard, ex-Air Force at the time.  Boy, weren't those the days, eh?  The Fifties.  Cold War.  Watching out for Evil Empire Tu-95 Bears (the bastards still come close today and require better-safe-than-sorry interception!)...

Kind of looks like a scene from MASH, doesn't it?

Below:  At the CAM-3 Substation.  Dad's on the right again.

Previous story

A Good Week At The Sentinel

Well, I just checked my SiteMeter stats for the past week. Hmm.... pretty much normal visitation stats, around 400-whatever per day, on average.  Par for the course these days.

But wait... Sunday saw unusually high (for that day) visitations.  As did Monday, and that was an all-time high, I believe, for one day at the Canadian Sentinel (although it's possible that I got even more visits on the day I blew the whistle in '06 on the Jamaat ul Fuqra terrorist training camp located just outside of Ottawa, as on that day, my SiteMeter server had mysteriously crashed and I ended up recording only about 550 visits... what if there'd been no crash that day?).

Looks like I really struck a Hard-Left nerve with my coverage of the manufactured-crisis, recklessly-covered-by-the-unfair-and-discriminatory-Big-Old-Media, overpropagated, misguided, hypocritical, history-ignorant anti-proguation protests.  Apparently, the Hard Left is sensitive to accusations that they accuse conservatives of "being equal to Hitler".  As they always were doing to Bush, yet not to Obama, who's doing the very same stuff (killing Muslims in the Middle East) as Bush did.

As for the figure for Tuesday, well, that's where it was at when I copied the image.  It continues to rise as I write this.

Yup.  Good week.  Pissing off Leftists really brings in the visits.

Just sayin'.  Really, nothing to see here.  Move on.  To the next post, that is...

UPDATE...

Even better by the end of the day...  697 visits.  Verified all-time one-day high.

Hey, look!  I've got a cool "hockey-stick" graph going here.  And it's not based on "fudged" and discarded data, either, so you can be confident that my "science is sound".  Heh.  Up yers, Infamous Hockey-Stick Graph Mann, plus y'all a the UN-IPCC, UEA, and certainly Algor, D. Suzuki et al...

PETA's Terrorist Act Leaves Victim CabMin Defiant, To Defend Seal Hunt

DEFIANT:

Canadian Fisheries Minister Gail Shea will NOT submit to Hard-Left terrorist tactics

So some foreign (American) Hard-Left "animal rights" extremist entered Canada and commited a terrorist act (believe it or not, a Liberal is demanding the government treat it as a terrorist act... a Liberal!  'scuse me- off to look for flying pigs) to scare Canada's Fisheries Minister into abolishing the seal hunt.

Well, it's not going to work.

The terrorists will NOT be rewarded.

PETA shall henceforth be dismissed as a terrorist organization.

Also, I'd like to highlight about PETA:

How come they think that animal life is more important than human life?  How come they have a shit fit when Obama kills a fly on TV, but they don't give a shit about the mass slaughter of innocent human beings via the womb?  That's an impossible one out of which to weasel or slither.  But then again, hey, to be Hard-Left is to believe that human life has no value, or that only certain human life has value and other human life doesn't.  It's actually rooted in Nazi ideology, as I've pointed out many, many times (Where do you think "Planned Parenthood" came from?  Do you know that founder Margaret Sanger was a supporter of Nazism, of the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party, the KKK,  of eugenics and racism?).

I bet the Left and the Big Old Media would be a lot madder if it had been an abortion doctor, or the pro-abortion Obama, or his pro-abortion Czar John Holdren, who'd been pied in the face.  No doubt the full force of the American state apparatus would come down hard on that terrorist, and it'd be used as an excuse to further persecute "right-wing extremists", ie. anyone who disagrees with the Obamacrat Agenda.

Hey, maybe we ought to start profiling "animal-rights" activists for known terrorist-organization connections. After all, just like the assfoolclown Napolitano DHS said of Mainstream Americana, such folks are potentially violent, potentially terrorists, even if they're not known to have commited an act of violence before.

Perhaps foreign PETA members should be banned from entering Canada, just like we ban known Al Qaeda members.  Oh, wait- forgot about the Khadrs, though those bastards were already here anyway.

Hey, y'know... when the Hard Left hits you, you've got to hit back every bit as hard!

Never falter, never waver.  Victory against the socialists is the only option.

Appeasement is not an option, because history teaches that it never works.

And, in closing...

Let them eat pie!

Anti-Prorogue Protestors: Victims Of Lies, Propaganda, Manipulation

That's right, folks.

Last weekend's anti-proroguation (proroguation is a perfectly normal, constitutional, frequently-invoked-by-all-governing-parties legislative tool) protests, while they may well have included some members of Mainstream Canadiana, these folks were victims.

Victims not of the government, but of the partisan demagoguery and arrogant hypocrisy of the Liberals, the New Democrats, of the Big Old Media, anti-Conservative partisans, socailist extremist groups, big lies, propaganda and a clearly-obvious, mass conspiracy to ignore, sanitize and rewrite history, both recent and ancient.

All for the purpose of the practice of the DOUBLE STANDARD.

All for the purpose of demonizing and defaming the Conservative government and Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Nothing that the whole anti-prorogue campaign did or said... was founded on fairness, nor on realistic perspective.

It was all just a convenient excuse to try to harm the Harper Tory government in the eyes of the electorate, by lying, deception, and incessant repetition by the Big Old Media, who's, we know, anti-Conservative at the core, and who will never do such a thing to Liberals who do the very same thing Harper did.

The Big Old Media, in concert with the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party and with various players on the Hard Left, decided to make a big deal all of a sudden out of something that never bothered them before.


It's like this, basically:

It's been done many, many, many  times throughout Canadian and Canadian provincial history.

Liberal PM Trudeau did it.  That was ok.

Liberal PM Chretien did it.  That was ok.

NDP Ontario Premier and current federal Liberal MP and leadership hopeful Bob Rae did it regularly.  That was ok.

Now Conservative PM Stephen Harper does it, too.  And according to the various factions comprising the protest, it's wrong, anti-democratic, despotic, and it means that Harper equals Hitler and all that.  (Late addendum:  Well, who rationally believes that there's no Hard-Left extremists out there who aren't already illogically, bizarrely, irrationally comparing Harper to Hitler, and who wouldn't be doing it now, using proroguation as an excuse, not that they need an excuse to be total asses?)


WTF?!


See, the Mainstream Canadiana folks whom I assume must have been there at least in small numbers... they're victims of a misinformation/disinformation and demonization campaign the likes of which Third Reich Minister of Propaganda Josef Goebbels would be proud.

They were duped, lied to and used.

They should be angry.  Not at the government who was merely doing what pretty much all other governments have always done, but rather at the Opposition parties, the Big Old Media and the Hard Left, for telling them all this bad stuff about proroguation all of a sudden, pretending that it's a horrible thing, all of a sudden, after all these decades and decades in which it's been done and no one said anything, was all "nothing to see here- move on".

I hope those few victimized Mainstream Canadiana protestors who took part in last weekend's perplexing, irrational, unfair, double-standard-based protest, who now should (surely at least a few will find out and feel violated and royally pissed about it) realize that they were lied to, manipulated and used for partisan propaganda purposes, will, in the future, think more and ask more questions and do more online research before submitting theirselves, their energy and their time to something like that again.

Because I know they want to be well-informed, have analyzed the evidence, have ensured that they're being fair, and don't want to be caught practicing a double standard on behalf of those who put them up to it via dishonest propaganda and manipulation. 


Don't let them use you.  Don't be a victim.


Always stand back and calmly proceed to acquire, on your own, a scrupulous, no-stone-unturned, situation awareness.  Be in charge of your own mind, rather than selling it out to extremists who only pretend to be nice to use you.