Reader Tips and Funny Stuff

I just had a real cool idea: why not do a 'reader tips' post for folks to give us all the heads-up on stuff they find while surfing, plus a funny picture or two?

Why not, indeed? Yep, I will. After all, part of the beauty of being the supreme overlord of a blog is being able to post whatever one wants, so here goes!

We can talk about the pictures, too! Why not have a little fun once in a while?

Above: Miss Piggy and anti-American moonbat "Dixie (Ditzy) Chick" Natalie Maines: separated at birth? Gotta admit they're both cute, though... but Miss Piggy is nicer, even considering she tends to clobber the hapless little Kermit and pretty much anybody who annoys her...

Above: no description needed. We know who that is, and what the dollar sign and the cross really signify.

***BREAKING NEWS***

Senator Hillary Clinton caught on security camera in mens' room going peepee... like a man. Questions abound as to whether Hillary is really a woman. Enraged, red-faced hubby Bill, shown below, in denial, says "That woman is not a man... Hillary". Jon Stewart to discuss this developing story with Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh on FAUX News at 9 PM ET.

You know how it's said that people often resemble their pets? Well, I wonder if that's Nancy Pelosi and her kitty? Plus, I wonder what happened to the idiot who decided the buttons on Nancy's sleeve would look good so clownishly large...

Where's the Widespread Outrage?

Shocking story here.

Another liberal judge.

Again, evil gets a slap on the wrist.


Excerpts:

One victim, who was 13 when the crimes began, told the court how she was held as a "sex slave" by the couple for several months.

She said the man, now 34, threatened to get members of a Winnipeg street gang and the Hells Angels to come after her family if she didn't comply with his demands.

The girl said that on at least two occasions, she was tied to a bed after being given pills and alcohol, then raped by the husband while his wife looked on.

(...)

She also claimed the man proudly showed her to his criminal friends, saying "this is the one" as he kept her in a locked room for nearly four consecutive days.

The woman was let off... just like that, despite being convicted. She raped the girls, too, yet was let off without punishment. The liberal judge illogically reasoned that time spent in custody awaiting trial was punishment enough.

The man got a mere seven years (we know he'll get out in a fraction of that!) and left the courtroom... grinning. Only an evil person would be grinning.

The more this happens, the more and more people will feel as if it's not such a bad thing to do the sort of thing that these two people did. The pitifully inadequate "liberal" consequences are obviously of no consequence to those who live for risk, like to live dangerously and get their jollies by tormenting and ruining the lives of others.

I guess forcibly confining and raping children is now considered by liberals as a "sexual orientation" and will someday be "written in" to the Charter by a future Liberal government or by the "courts" themselves as a protected class or something. Apparently pedophilia is a human right in the minds of liberals (they don't dare say it just yet), and, considering that children don't seem to be allowed many rights at all relative to adults, then the left will someday reason that it's a "human right" for adults to do whatever they want to children. It's conceivable. It's the slippery slope. After all, liberals don't even think unborn humans are even human at all and have no rights at all, so is it such a stretch to assert this?

After all, in society, it's ok to hit children to "correct" them, but it would violate the rights of adult criminals to do it to them to correct them. I have a problem with that in that it's illogical and inconsistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It's discrimination against children on the basis of age. Plus, the schools are now forcibly indoctrinating children in unnecessary and wholly inappropriate things like "gay" anal sex (while refusing to even mention abstinence) and in being a Muslim (while refusing to allow mention of Jesus or God)... against the wishes of their parents!

Society is spiralling downwards, downwards... into an abyss of evil immorality, clearly, willingly condoned by the left.

They ruined the lives of these children... permanently harmed them. And a liberal judge treats these evildoers... liberally.

In Canada.

I didn't make this up.

Choose your Canada.

Reject evil. Reject liberalism.

Liberal Activist: My Party is Corrupt, Women Shouldn't Be Allowed to Vote

Well, duh!

In his postings, which are no longer online, Burghardt slammed the Liberal Party as greedy and corrupt, the Kyoto climate change accord as stupid, same-sex marriage as wrong and missile defence as good.

On May 18, 2005, Burghardt wrote that Belinda Stronach's defection from the Conservatives to the Liberals "demonstrates one more reason why women shouldn't be allowed to run for office, much less vote."

Well, well, well... what did I say? The Liberals are throwing stones in glass houses!

Corrupt, stupid, wrong... and sexist. Yes, sexist. A Liberal declaring that women shouldn't be allowed to run for office or even vote.

This is shocking, appalling!

This is the smoking gun, not only of the Liberal Party of Canada's corruption, but of its attitude towards women! Therefore, women shouldn't vote for the Liberal Party! The Liberal Party wants to control women, obviously, and take away their rights!

Hypocrites! They dared to suggest that we Conservatives were like that, which we clearly aren't!

Shame on the Liberals!

They brought this upon themselves, and I'm only too pleased to use it against them!

Thanks to the Toronto Sun. Thanks to blogging. The Liberals will be finished off! For the good of Canada!

Don't Fear Terrorists; They're Moms and Dads Like You: Rosie O'Donnel

Another moonbat nut!

In a discussion on the moonbatty chick chat show "The View", Rosie O'Donnel uttered the following dumbass remark:

"Well then, get away from the fear," interrupted O'Donnell. "Don't fear the terrorists. They're mothers and fathers."

Oh, really? We shouldn't fear people who go around killing people just 'cause they're moms and dads?

Ok. I see. People who are about to behead you aren't scary just because they happen to have offspring? Very well, Rosie.

And it's not scary that they put bombs on their kids and make them go around blowing themselves up in our pizza parlors and marketplaces and on buses? Ah, gotcha.

Everyone in favor of having Rosie put into the nuthouse to get professional help say "aye"!

Not only are the terrorists scary, so is Rosie!

Ahmadinejad in '79 US Embassy Occupation: New Picture

Ahmadinejad in 1979 US Embassy hostage-taking & today?

WND Exclusive:

Excerpts:

The Russian publication Kommersant has published a newly located photograph of a U.S. hostage-taker in Iran circa 1979 bearing a striking resemblance to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The Iranian leader has steadfastly denied he was involved in the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the holding of 52 Americans for 444 days despite assertions to the contrary of some of those hostages and former Iranian President Abholhassan Bani-Sadr, who says he was a ringleader and the liaison with Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

(...)

Perhaps the most damning evidence against Ahmadinejad with regard to the hostage-taking came from Bani-Sadr, Iran's president during the early days of the Khomeini revolution.

He has adamantly affirmed Ahmadinejad was one of the kidnappers who held 52 Americans for 444 days. He said the former student leader was in the embassy throughout the hostage crisis.

(...)

At least six former American hostages agree the president of Iran played a key role in interrogating and abusing them.

Read it all!

That sure looks like Ahmadinejad to me. Why wouldn't it be? That's the kind of guy he is, after all.

UPDATE: RoxieAmerica has more on this. Image below is from RoxieAmerica. Go to the site to see full-sized image.

Reader Tips

Whatcha got?

Hypocritical Germany To Prosecute Rummy for "War Crimes"??

Above: NeoNazis, one wearing an Islamic Kaffiyeh. Are the Germans being Dhimmis in trying to accuse former US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld of "war crimes"? Are the Germans repeating history by allying with the Muzis against the Free World? Is Germany really still part of the Free World, anyway? Is Germany once again in economic and societal trouble and seeking a scapegoat?

Above: Muslim Nazi (Muzi) soldiers in the SS. Is this alliance being renewed between Germany and Islam?

Germany, of all countries, where even today there's a significant continuing Nazi presence and where anti-Semitism is reaching 1933 levels all over again?

Based on the post by Gayle at My Republican Blog:

Seems that Germany, of all countries, considers detentions/uncomfortable interrogations of murderous, evil Islamofascist jihadists to constitute "war crimes". This is just rich... Germany isn't in a position to deem what constitutes "war crimes"... remember the Holocaust? I'd shut the f... up if I were the Germans, who need to cleanse their nation of all those bloody neoNazis running around today in their streets and cities. And to protect the Jews at least as much as they protect the Muzis who want to take over Germany and Islamify it.

This is the sort of thing that constitutes "war crimes", in the minds of the Holocaust-guilty Germany:

"special interrogation plan," personally approved by Rumsfeld, which the U.S. says produced valuable intelligence. But to obtain it, according to the log of his interrogation and government reports, Qahtani was subjected to forced nudity, sexual humiliation, religious humiliation, prolonged stress positions, sleep deprivation and other controversial interrogation techniques.

Huh? That's supposed to be bad? But just think of what the Muzis do to their prisoners! If you don't know, then you know nothing and have no business giving an opinion on how the jihadists were interrogated, which does NOT constitute torture, unless one also considers college hazing and making schoolchildren sit on the floor, stand in the corner, bend over a lap for a whipping, etc...

How come it's perfectly legal to hit children, inflicting agonizing pain upon them, calling it a "spanking" or "discipline", but we cannot make Islamofascistic jihadists uncomfortable to soften them up so they'll talk? I bet that if we spanked jihadists, Germany would prosecute for "war crimes", too. Grr... maybe we should spank them Lederhosen-wearing, beer-swilling, Benz-driving, wurst-(b)eating Krauts! (I can slur the Germans, being part German myself, so shut up, okay?)

Fofecksake, that isn't "torture"! Only an imbecile moonbat would call that "torture". What is Germany's real agenda? Do they want to hurt America? Again?

Read Gayle's entire post, where she provides her commentary and with which I agree wholeheartedly. Gayle can hit just as hard as I can, so it's worth your time. Also provided are links for those ignorant of Germany's history.

What Germany is doing it just bullshit! Those idiots are full of it! Who do they think they are, anyway?

Seems there's a lot of folks out there who are insanely jealous of America, what with being the real Leader of the Free World, the real Beacon of Liberty, the real Superpower, all at once... pure jealousy!

Why isn't Germany going after the Islamofascists, who are the ones who are actually committing the war crimes all over the world every bloody day? Why try to "prosecute" the very people who are trying to stop these war criminals? This is insane!

Why not go after China, North Korea, Cuba, Zibmabwe, Rwanda, etc., etc, for their daily violations of every human right in the book? Germany can't point fingers at the Free World as long as it looks the other way on crimes against humanity committed by the NonFree World.

If Germany cared about "war crimes", they'd be in Iraq fighting the Saddamites!

Germany cares about war crimes? Yeah, suuuure, and Tinkerbell just flew out of my bum!

Germany is making itself look bad and angering me, as well as others!

The Germans are soooo living in glass houses. To throw stones now, well... broken glass isn't new to Germany... remember Kristallnacht!

Elton John: Ban Religion

Elton John, above and below: is this the guy folks should take seriously?

Story here.

So Eltie Johnny wanna ban religion? Because it supposedly promotes "hatred of gays", as he claims?

I see... and gays don't themselves promote hatred and spite of, say, Christians? (Read here about a gay man who raped and murdered a Christian woman just for questioning his ideology, and of the hateful reaction of gays towards the victim and their exoneration of the cruel rapist-killer) Of anyone who doesn't agree with their radical ideology? Sure they don't. Oh, wait... yes, they do! No doubt about it! And how come the gays never say anything critical of Islam, which is murderously intolerant of homosexuality and should scare the panties off of "Elton", but which he's too terrified to single out as the most hateful, most murderous so-called "religion" of all? I'd then agree with him on that one! But he wants to ban it all!

Well, as long as we're talking about banning something that's constitutionally guaranteed in the Free World, why don't we also ban something that's a dogma and that promotes hatred, like, say, homosexuality?

Hey, shut up, Eltie... you started the stupidity... oh, you're calling me a "f... ... ....."? Real mature, sophisticated, indeed, aren't ya? Eltie, listen, if you can't take shit you don't like, you shouldn't dish it out. You shouldn't say such moronic, dumbassed things and expect folks will give you a freakin' standing O. Oh, no... the world doesn't revolve around you, nope. And I don't care if you need all that attention and asskissing- I'm not going to submit to your fascism! That's right: you're a clownish fascist!

Ban that which is a constitutional right, you say? Big shithead. I have news: your own bizarre ideology isn't a constitutional right, so watch what you say. Leave others alone if you want to be left alone. Don't condemn everyone for the mean utterances or actions of a very few. Shame on you.

Rich, famous, pretentious, thinking they're gods or kings or queens... these folks think they're God's gift to us commoners, don't they? Think we must bow or kneel before them?

Idiot.

Google Ignores Veterans' Day for Eighth Straight Year

WND: (Read it!)

That Google, the online search engine, is beginning to scare the hell out of me. It's looking more and more as if it's evil, actually!

Google simply refuses to honor the American veterans. It honors all sorts of things except for the veterans and for Christmas and Easter, both Christian holidays. Getting the picture now?

Google allows China to block such words as "democracy" and "human rights", making itself a party to totalitarian censorship in the name of the almighty buck.

Google consistently acts against the Republicans and in favor of the Democrats.

Google's CEO gave as much money as legal to John Kerry, Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton.

I believe Google hates America.

Why do they honor Canadian war veterans but not American ones? This makes me sad and angry.

And I'm thinking about why on earth I'm still using Google's Blogger/Blogspot service to blog. What's the matter with me? These folks at Google have a clearly militant leftist agenda. At least I don't pay a cent for it.

Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if they shut down my blog for criticizing them. But don't worry- if they do that, I'll just continue on another service provider... and a better one, too!

Google sucks! Pass it on!

Use other search engines whenever possible. I do.

NYT Whitewashes Truth on New Muslim Congressman

LGF:

Again the New York Times comes to the defense of radical Islamic candidate Keith Ellison, in a slobbery puff piece that does not even mention his links to CAIR, and blithely brushes past his history with the Nation of Islam as if it didn’t matter.

See the double standard? If a Republican happens to be a devout Christian or if a Republican had once had anything to do with a "White" organization, the New York Times and pretty much all the MSM would be making a big deal out of it, as if it mattered.

But they don't bother to address Keith Ellison's ties to the NOI and the CAIR, giving him the automatic benefit of the doubt which they never grant Christians and/or conservatives.

Keep in mind that the NOI is racist, only accepting Black Muslims. And that the CAIR is a front organization of Hamas and supporter of terrorism.

In the post-9-11 era, this is unacceptable. Yet the left continues to keep its head firmly lodged up inside its hiney hole. We have an Islamofascist in Congress in the United States of America.

But what does the Islamic world care? Will they now allow a Christian or a Jew or an Atheist to be part of the government of one of their theocracies? Like hell they would... they'd most likely just, summarily, behead the candidate. As is the will of some imaginary dude named "Allah".

The Islamic world sees this development as a sign from Allah, most likely. They see it as another big step on their imperialist road, another step towards the Islamification of the Free World. Thanks to those who voted for Ellison, the Islamofascists will be emboldened and motivated all the more.

The NYT is so biased. It will be a pleasure to watch them slowly slip towards bankruptcy.