Already.
I did not make this up.
(Of course, to say that other Islamists are infiltrating the White House might be a bit redundant, though still certainly requiring mention!)
Just ask Tarek Fatah.
“Instead of bringing victory over the fascist forces of the Muslim Brotherhood, we now recognize that their infiltration is right up to the American White House, but we can’t say that.”
“Today we are fighting another idea of Islamo-fascism that has shut our mouths and we can’t speak because we’re too scared that someone may turn around and call us a racist. And mind you, everyday as I speak, a few dozen Muslims would have been killed by now by these Jihadi’s.”
(Mr. Fatah names names, too, at the link. There's video of him speaking, as well)
“Please understand that there is a distinction between Islam as a faith which, along with every other religion, has its own problems, and “Islamism,” which is an ideology, a political ideology, that says that Western Civilization has to be destroyed.”
“The books that are distributed at Eaton Centre and the Dundas Square clearly state by the founders of the Muslim Brotherhood that all Western countries have to be destroyed.”
Who wants to pretend that it's just "hatemongering"?
I can think of at least one person. ;)
Is this you?
8 comments:
Why should we take the word of a Marxist like Fatah? Misinformation plain and simple.
Right. After all, Obama's a Marxist, too. Oh, wait, no... Obama's a Leninist. Which ain't any better.
Can't believe a word a socialist/communist says. Then againn, can't believe a word said by those that say that there's no Islamization movement in the Free World. Do you fall under any of these categories, Michael?
I don't think anyone is denying the existence of Muslims who want to impose an Islamic state on the world. There are lots of people who deny that Islamisation poses such a grave threat that we need to circle the wagons and toss aside centuries of liberal democratic traditions.
See the difference?
http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Funny/ostrich_head-butt.jpg
See the difference?
Interesting, incidentally, how ostrich legs and feet bear a striking resemblance to upright-walking dinosaurs...
Much like liberals they are a striking example of evolutionary convergence. Features that should be extinct somehow persist.
The liberals' ability to manufacture their own environment is a neat evolutionary trick, but always proves maladapted to the light of truth.
Their cultivation of ignorance has led to another bloom of their numbers and a temporarily successful self predation strategy. Ultimately the consequence of the bloom and ravenous feasting (liberal fascism) is ghastly. We've seen it before, and we'll see it again and again until we can find a way to root out the cracks these bastards crawl out of.
Yep. Ostriches look like dinosaurs and liberals look like fascists.
Nasty birds.
Very well-put, Infin.
Hey CS. I was wondering if you have ever seen Pat Condell on a roll. If not... you're going to love this.
Remember the old Pioneer stereo ads?
Turn it up and sit back. It's rather like that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9dXGJ2rYdA
Post a Comment