Separated at Birth?

Or reunited in death?

For the strange, almost alien, dead beast on the left, see the story here. h/t: Bourque.org

The one on the right was a filthy jihadist known as Al-Zarqawi.

But the one on the left is more important.




"It was evil, evil looking. And it had a horrible stench I will never forget," she told the Sun Journal of Lewiston. "We locked eyes for a few seconds and then it took off. I've lived in Maine my whole life and I've never seen anything like it."

(...)

It was charcoal gray, weighed between 40 and 50 pounds and had a bushy tail, a short snout, short ears and curled fangs hanging over its lips, he said. It looked like "something out of a Stephen King story."

(...)

In the end, wildlife officials got a DNA analysis that showed the animal was a rare wolf-dog hybrid, he said.




Just to be clear, the above excerpt concerns the beast on the left. But one can very easily be forgiven for thinking it's about the one on the right. The resemblance is downright creepy as hell!

Oh... mystery solved! A wolf-dog hybrid... that's the thing on the left.

Now, can anyone tell me just what the bloody feck was that evil-looking thing on the right?!

Jeez, but the world is really fecked-up, ain't it?

What next? Will they finally find Osama Bin Laden... hopefully dead as well? Or perhaps Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Sooner or later it'll be time for those beasts to say hello to Satan... and have to bend over for him for eternity...

Hypocritical Leftists, Female Boobs and Gay Peckers

Read the story. h/t: Nealenews.com

Funny... all of a sudden these cosmopolitan Torontonians, including Mayor David Miller, find public nudity offensive? So the display of female breasts on the streets of Toronto is offensive?

Oh, yeah?!

Hey, David, what about these guys with their proud, gay tallywhackers out... in the street?... in Toronto?... in Canada? I did not make this up!

Why are straight female breasts offensive, but gay male penises are not?

Recall this SDA post from last summer.

And recall this TCS post from a few months ago.

Political correctness plus bigotry... never have I seen leftists twist themselves into such impossible, hypocritical, inconsistent positions!

More evidence of leftism being a mental disorder!

I'm just so sick and tired of poopheaded moonbat asshats and their all-over-the-place, phony-morality, phony-"equality", have their-cake-and-play-sex-games-with-it-too bullshit attitude!

Listen up, all you AIDS activists, if it's okay for gay guys to walk around with their dicks and nuts dangling for all, including children, to see, in public, then it's ok for women to be bare breasted in public.

In fact, in Ontario, it is not a crime anymore! You, AIDS activists and you, David Miller, are practicing discrimination against women while eagerly canonizing stupid, perverted, naked gay asshats walking around with their urinary/copulatory organs clearly visible in public!

Bunch of asshats!

At least you can call the naked gay guys "disgusting" and "offensive" and call for the police to enforce the law against the display of sexual organs in public, which is still in force! Gay parades shouldn't be exempt from compliance with the laws of Canada and of Ontario just because Toronto's Supreme Moonbat Overlord David Miller deems they shall be!

What the hell is the matter with you gosh-darned leftist moonbat poopheads?

Please, people of Toronto, don't vote for David Miller. For the love of Toronto! Get that freaking nutcase out of there!

Some APA Psychiatrists On Same Page As Sentinel on "Conversion"

Recall the post I did last month.

It partly concerned the issue of helping gay folks who want to be straight to become straight.

That sparked some debate in the comments.

Well, now we have this report, with actual APA psyciatrists, including the very one who pushed in the first place to have homosexuality arbitrarily deemed as "not changeable", now declaring that they've ample evidence that gays can become straight.





(...) Dr. Robert Spitzer -- the psychiatrist who led the effort in 1973 to remove homosexuality from the APA's list of psychological disorders -- has since changed his position, based on his research into successful conversion therapies.

(...)

"Contrary to conventioned [sic] wisdom," Spitzer said in a statement, "some highly motivated individuals, using a variety of change efforts, can make substantial change in multiple indicators of sexual orientation."

(...)

"[The APA is] discouraging research and then saying there is no research," he added. "They are politically discouraging research, but in fact, in spite of their efforts, there is research. The APA is not being honest when they say there is no research."

(...) "[P]atients should have the right to explore their
heterosexual potential."




...So the Canadian Sentinel is not alone in the arguments made in last month's post. The psychiatric profession is contradicting the arrogantly dictatorial APA on whether folks can change their sexual orientation.

Politically incorrect to say this stuff? Maybe. But I'm just tired of folks telling us that folks are necessarily born one way or another, in the absence of credible, wholly unbiased, proven-to-not-be-a-hoax scientific proof thereof.

What does this mean? It means that the standard argument used to justify homosexuality as something inherited in the womb and which is unchangeable no longer has the impact it once did in the days of political correctness' power to manipulate the mind of the average person into believing whatever the left wanted them to believe. Folks tend to believe something is so just because they hear so often and from so many folks that something is so... like, for example, the false claim of Islam being a "religion of tolerance, love and peace", which I have disproven over and over again on this blog.

Why do I do this post? Because I'm concerned that there are many folks who have been manipulated by unethical gay people into converting to that lifestyle. There are indeed folks who are suffering all kinds of stress, all kinds of mental and emotional difficulties, including confusion. These folks often seek the comfort of easy "answers", even false, dogmatic ones (like folks who become Muslims, in my opinion). It is, after all, human nature to seek a direction, something to focus on, so they won't be directionless, confused, searching for "meaning"... and I contend that "going that way" might actually be that "false answer" for a lot of folks who decided to be gay.

Do I have a problem with gay people? Absolutely not! But I can see what's going on. I witness people in their behavior. I listen to what they say. I can see patterns which lead to analyses and conclusions, much like a scientific researcher, except society is my laboratory and watching folks in real-life situations is the experiment in which I gather data and store it in my grey matter. And, hey, yes, all I can do is claim to have done this "experiment"... but that's the same as with the scientists we've heard about who claimed to have done studies and come to a "final" conclusion of absolute proof that gays are born that way, which was always grabbed upon by the MSM and trumpeted as if the truth, which was never independently verified... only blindly accepted as true in the name of either political correctness or dogmatic ideology.

Admit it... you think about stuff also, with a critical mind, but are afraid to point out what you've figured out for fear of getting the Christopher Columbus or Winston Churchill treatment at the hands of those who prefer to stick to polite, if possibly false, dogmas.

There's nothing wrong with being on either side of the fence, if you know what I mean. But it is, in my view, indeed wrong to lie to people about whether they have to be on one side or another. The apparent truth is that it is ultimately up to the individual to choose. And common intellectual sense indicates that it is a matter of choice.

Tell me: what's so horrible about admitting that it's a matter of choice; that it might not be genetically programmed at all? Should people just make like the three famous monkeys (see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil) and sing the inane tune "they're all born that way... period... it's settled... so shut up!"?

I also ask: isn't it also possible that there are gay folks who want to "recruit" more and more people with propaganda so as to themselves feel better simply by having more folks who go the same way? I think that this is sometimes happening, and it is indeed wrong to make false statements to manipulate impressionable people, particularly youths, into doing something they might otherwise not make a commitment to do.

I bet the comments section is going to attract a couple of moonbats, possibly to accuse me of "hate" or something. But only a stupid person or a person who fails to understand my arguments and points would do that.

So go ahead and discuss if you wish.

Willy and Harry Get Tanked

h/t: Drudge

Looks like everybody had a good time...

Ya know... I don't think they're real... I mean, her boobs, not the Royal Boobs...

Get a load of the look on Willy's face!

Damn! Them Royals have all the fun!

I'm jealous!

You da man, Harry!

Uh... I hope I'm not in trouble now... but political correctness ain't my thing, after all! Ain't nothing wrong with guys and girls having a little naughty fun together, is there?

Too bad the Islamofascists will never know this kind of fun!

Iran's Ahmadinejad Launches Blog

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: The World's First Blogging Super Tyrant

BUMPED TO TOP IN CASE ANYONE MISSED THIS POST

Well, now I've seen it all. A nuclear madman, hellbent on the destruction of the world, just launched, not a bomb, but a blog...


http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/


h/t: National Terror Alert

There's an English version. Look to the upper right, at the flags. There's a defaced American flag along with other flags. Click it for English.

There's a poll. Asks if the US and Israel are "pulling the trigger" for a World War with the conflict in Lebanon. I voted no, which is what he doesn't want us to do, nor wants to hear. Guess what? 65% said no! His "own" people are telling him "no", but that won't matter. Only Allah's imaginary will matters to this fuzzy-faced scumpile.

He appears to be quite full of himself, as well as being full of shit.

Well, I haven't "anal"yzed this verbal diarrhea, but have at it if you will. It's on his site, too.

This is scary... I feel as if I'm reading Hitler's blog, if he had had one. Scary.

I left a comment in English and have copied it for all to see for themselves:

(Warning: extremely offensive language, but it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's blog... and I wanted to make the comment really good! However, it's slightly edited for non-scumbag consumption... the scumbag gets the full monte)

Go f*** yourself, Momo, you filthy Islamofascist pig.

You are lesser than a speck of shit on the sole of a monkey's foot

You are lower than my shoes... after I've walked in canine excrement.

I fart wetly upon your mangy beard, you malevolent baboon a$$hole

You and Islam will fail.

The Free World will prevail.

If you think otherwise, then you are f***ing retarded

A question: does killing entire groups of folks who are different from you actually compensate for having an embarrassingly small p*n*s?

Or are you just some kind of closet homosexual pedophile trying to sound macho so no one will suspect your true nature?

Sincerely, The Canadian Sentinel



Yeah! I hope he gets someone to translate it for him!

Well, I clicked the "post comment" button.

It's probably being held for moderation. But of course! These guys don't want us to just say anything we want, after all... probably get deleted, but I hope he reads it!

Ironically, Momo has previously cracked down on civilian bloggers. Guess only he himself is allowed to impose his bullshit upon the world...

UPDATE: I just clicked on the link again, this next day... and the site is gone... replaced with something wholly different in Arabic.

Wonder what's up with that?

Stupid Islamofascists...

Maybe I spooked poor li'l Mahmo?

Maybe they didn't want us Westerners reading that self-congratulatory, pro-Khomeini, anti-Shah, totally-fullashit verbal butt splattery... it could give the stinking bums' war strategy away or expose them further or something...

Hey, Momo... big, tough man... whassamattah? You afraid? Ohhh, poor little baby! Oh, and, again: you're going down, man... there ain't no Allah, no Paradise, no virgins... you're going to Hell... to join Zarqawi and his 72 big, fat, hairy gay demon jail keepers...

UPDATE 2: Ahmadinejad's site is up again!

If you want to leave a comment there, knock yourself out! Don't hold back; don't pull your punches! Give 'im the full monte! Tell 'im what you think of him!

I just did... again! See my comments section for the commentary I left. Doesn't seem to be passing moderation, though. Probably 'cause the effers don't understand English or dirty English words.

Or at least keep trying... they seem to have an obsolete server that's often busy. Seems they're bush during our daytime hours and less so during our dinnertime/evening hours.

Go tell the m-f'er off!

Be a part of history!

Stand up for the Free World!

Speak up for freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights!

Let's roll!

Jihadists Caught With Explosives in Their Kids' Baby Bottles

Tell me: is this human?



Northeast Intelligence Network:

14 August 2006: According to authorities at Scotland Yard, Abdula Ahmed ALI, 25, and his 23-year-old wife Cossor ALI were arrested and are being questioned over suspicions that they were planning to use their baby's bottle to hide a liquid bomb. Cossor's grandfather, Nazir Ahmed, 84, admitted that Abdula ALI traveled to Pakistan about four weeks ago. That admission follows information from British Intelligence officials that many of the airline bomb plot suspects posed as relief workers to travel to al-Qaeda training camps in Pakistan. Police spent Sunday searching the suspect’s east London housing commission flat for evidence.

Police in the UK have recovered baby bottles containing peroxide, including some with false bottoms, from a recycling centre close to the homes of some of the arrested suspects.

In a separate but related case, a Muslim family of five- a husband, wife and 3 children, boarded American Airlines flight 109 at Britain’s Heathrow airport destined for Boston Logan airport on Sunday, 6 August 2006.

(...)

Upon landing back at Heathrow, armed marshals boarded the aircraft and took the suspect and his family into custody. It was at that time a search of the children’s carry-on baggage revealed the deadly cargo.



Religion of tolerance, love and peace? Are you sure?

What are some Muslims being taught by their "religion"... that would make them sacrifice their own babies for Allah?

This is the nature of the enemy. Understand.

UK Muslims Responsible for Terrorist Networks: Column

Story here. h/t: NewMediaJornal.us




"When will the Muslim community in this country accept an absolute, undeniable, total truth: that Islamic terrorism is their problem?" wrote John Stevens, former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, in a Sunday newspaper.

In an inflammatory opinion column, he called on Muslims to "stop the denial, endless fudging and constant wailing that somehow it is everyone else's problem and, if Islamic terrorism exists at all, they are somehow the main victims".

(...)

"Of course, there'll be instant squealings that this is racism. It's not," Lord Stevens insisted.

"It's exactly the same as recognising that, during the Northern Ireland troubles that left thousands dead, the IRA were totally based in the Catholic community and the UVF in the Protestant."



Indeed, it is an Islamic problem.

Does anyone in their right mind think that the jihadists, who come directly from Islamic families, Islamic communities, Islamic Mosques, etc... aren't being either actively or passively aided and abetted by their families, friends, neighbors, Imams, etc.?

It is illogical to claim that it isn't a problem of the Islamic community, wherever there's an Islamic community.

Recall this post about a former jihadist, who himself understands the very essence of the problem. His prescriptions for defeating jihad are very clear: go to the source.

Jihad is an essential, mandatory component of Islam, after all. Therefore, Islam is the root cause of jihad.

And Muslims must face up to this, if they care. If they want Islam to survive, or perish in nuclear armageddon, thanks to the Islamofascists, whom they hardly ever denounce.

It's up to them.

The Dhimmification of Mike Wallace

Has-been American MSMer Mike Wallace has gone Dhimmi. He has willingly submitted to the will of a murderous, hateful, supremacistic tyrant hellbent on acquiring nuclear weapons, just for the big-fat-hairy-deal privilege of interviewing that little Iranian twit named Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Mike Wallace wants so badly to be famous that he'll effectively, arguably become evil, himself.

Can you say, "Marching in lockstep with Islamofascism"?


Story here. Do read it all! h/t: Nealenews.com



At one point Wallace was trying to get Ahmadinejad to give more concise answers, but Ahmadinejad refused and playfully offered to end the interview. And Wallace said, "I couldn't be happier for the privilege of sitting down with the president of Iran."(...)


Incredible. This is what the MSM has been reduced to. Submission to Islam in exchange for ratings... the truth be damned!


(...) Wallace crossed the line when he asked Ahmadinejad about President Bush and referred to him as the commander-in-chief of the "so-called 'free' world." In this case Wallace explicitly became a propagandist for Iranian tyranny, by endorsing a morally relativistic universe in which maybe Iran is really the free world and America isn't.


Lord in Heaven... an American... calling the President of the United States of America the "commander-in-chief of the "so-called 'free' world." So Mike Wallace doesn't believe we are free, then. I see. Does he believe that Iran is "free", or that once Israel, America, the entire "so-called 'Free World'" and the entire "Anglo-Saxon race" are all wiped out with nuclear bombs, the world will then be free?

The left must be doing cartwheels and summersaults in glee, planning to somehow canonize or saintify Mike Wallace in honor of his exalted, beautiful descent into the dark abyss of Dhimmitude, thus giving comfort to Islamofascism and paving the way for jihadic nuclear armageddon.

Mike Wallace can now join the ranks of the great left-wing moonbats Noam Chomsky and Ward Churchill! Congratulations on your recent Dhimmification, Mikey!

Pollster's Findings Contradict Other Pollster's Findings on PM's Israel Stance

Story here. h/t: Nealenews.com

Looks like the Strategic Counsel polling firm must've screwed up or something. Compass has come out with its own polling indicating that most Canadians overwhelmingly support Prime Minister Harper's pro-Israel stance.

Read the whole thing for yourself.

And ask: why are there two different polling firms giving very strongly contradictory results?



COMPASS pollster Conrad Winn says about his rival's polling techniques:




"The Globe poll didn't really ask a fair and unambiguous question," said COMPAS President Conrad Winn.

"It has a little bit of a negative tone to it. 'Actions' is a troublesome word," he said, adding that asking a question about Israeli "policy" would have been fairer.

Mr. Winn said complex issues about foreign policy can't be reduced to a single question.

"Most Canadians don't have a lot of facts about foreign policy at their fingertips," he said.



That's one for the pollster guys to deal with. Bet the ones who like the Strategic Counsel will have their work cut out for them.

Once again I say: of course it's possible for pollsters to be dishonest, disingenuous, manipulative or on the take, not that I'm pointing any fingers at any polling firms in particular.

And it's certainly also possible for a polling firm, as with any firm of any kind, to be stupid and/or incompetent.

Not that I'm pointing any fingers. I'm not allowed to point fingers.

Make up your own mind for yourself.

UK Al Qaeda Leader Captured, Large-Scale Attacks Still Possible

The Times Online reports:




SECURITY sources believe that a man arrested in last week’s anti- terror raids in Britain is Al-Qaeda’s leader in this country.

(...)

They believe that he was instrumental in sending the ringleader of at least one previous British terror plot for training at a camp in Pakistan last year. He is described by counter-terrorist officials at MI5 as the senior figure in a British terror network involving Kashmiri, north African and Iraqi cells.

(...)

The thwarting of the alleged plot has, however, failed to quash continuing fears among counter-terrorist experts. Senior security officials have briefed ministers that a “second phase” of attacks may be about to be launched.

(...)

Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al-Qaeda’s deputy head, is said to have warned in a message placed on a restricted extremists’ website last month that the terrorist group was planning two large-scale attacks this autumn.



I would assert that this information supports the information in the post below. The grave danger remains.

Ignore at your own risk.