Monday, November 30, 2009

Barack Snubs Canada


Whatever did we do to deserve this? Our PM Stephen Harper was nice to Barry-O, and said nice things about him and everything. And the polls show that Canadians like Obama a lot more than Americans do. Barry-O got far more niceness from us than he deserved.


Prime Minister Stephen Harper will not be among the world leaders briefed personally by U.S. President Barack Obama about his plans for a new strategy in Afghanistan.

Obama will contact a number of leaders, including those of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, China and Russia. But despite Canada's lengthy military commitment to the troubled region, Vice-President Joe Biden has been given the task of relaying the president’s plans to Harper.

Well, guess what, Barry-O? You can kiss our superior Canuck asses.

We know when somebody's being an effin' asshole.

Besides, you're not fit for command. There's zero doubt about this. Thanks to you personally, the war is lost already. Because that's your agenda, and we know it!

For consolation, we can remind ourselves that Barry-O also hates America.

Just for that...

A spell has been cast so that next time Barry-O goes to Presidential Crapper, he'll find this...

71% Mad At Government: Rasmussen

That's a devastating number of Americans to have royally pissed at one's regime.

And the percentage who are really, really pissed is nearly half.


The latest numbers show that only nine percent (9%) of voters trust the judgment of America’s political leaders more than the judgment of the American people. Seventy-four percent (74%) place more trust in the wisdom of the crowd.
Got that? Americans trust the Common Sense of the Common People, not the fecking-arsehole politicians.

Americans also see the government as a "special interest group". Well, duh. Of course it is. It's a special interest group that not only is self-serving, but serves other special interest groups who help them stay in power. We know that the government doesn't give a damn for ordinary people. Take Obamacare, for instance. It clearly won't be good for the People, but rather for the Special Interests who would be the only ones to benefit from the reform.

Seventy-one percent (71%) believe the federal government has become a special interest group that looks out primarily for its own interests. Sixty-eight percent (68%) believe that government and big business work together in ways that hurt consumers and investors.

I feel the rumblings of revolution building, building, building...

What's coming, clearly the government doesn't see it. But it's coming... the First Wave is in 2010, and the Second Wave in 2012. I suspect 2012 will be much more surprising than 2010.

Apparently Obama was NOT a "savior".

He's just another cursable asshole against whom Americans are pissed.

From now on, Americans aren't going to listen to government. They're going to listen to those who listen to them and who most closely resemble them as commoners.

The Elites might as well plan now for their post-political lives.

Climategaters Ban WND From Copenhagen

Those dumbass, lying Climategater UNers.
"Having now reviewed the application and in consultation with the Media and Accreditation Unit in New York, regrettably, we are not in a position to grant accreditation in this instance," he wrote. "As a for-profit subsidiary of the non-profit Western Journalism Center, we follow the U.N. guidelines on accreditation which specifies that advocacy publications of non-governmental or non-profit organizations do not qualify for media accreditation. Please note that the organization is under no obligation to accept your request if it does not meet U.N. standards and requirements for press accreditation."
The completely ignorant, and incredibly far-off-base idiot who wrote that astonishingly retarded PFO letter clearly doesn't have a fecking clue what he's talking about. He has no idea whatsoever what kind of media outlet World Net Daily actually is, and apparently is banning them based on nothing but prejudice thereagainst (ie. WND is known to be a "skeptic" who only wants undeniable, concrete, raw scientific proof, rather than Big Lies). Hell, what do we expect from the UN and from the criminally-conspiring Climategaters?

WND founder Joseph Farah responds to the uber-leftist imbecile:

"WorldNetDaily is NOT, as you mistakenly assert, a for-profit subsidiary of the Western Journalism Center. Neither is it an advocacy organization, though, like all news organizations, it does publish a broad spectrum of opinion – we believe, in fact, the broadest ideological spectrum of any news organization in the world," he continued. "Neither has WorldNetDaily ever been a subsidiary of Western Journalism Center or any other organization."

Farah continued: "The website began as a project of the Western Journalism Center in 1997. In 1999, the website was spun off as a completely independent for-profit corporation with no legal connection to its former parent. That was 10 years ago. I speak authoritatively on this subject as the founder of BOTH organizations, though I, like my company, WorldNetDaily, have no connection to the Western Journalism Center today."

Farah also pointed out that many non-profit news organizations have already been cleared for coverage of the Copenhagen convention, including the world's largest, the Associated Press.

"Now that you have been made aware of the facts, we look forward to an expeditious approval of Dr. Corsi's credentials for coverage," he concluded. "If you have any more questions about our history or organization, I stand ready to address them so that our correspondent can make plans to be in Copenhagen."
Mr. Farah will not tolerate any illegal bullshit from the Climategaters and will haul the lying bastards before court should they continue to discriminate and to militate against freedom of the press and further demonstrate that they're a bunch of Big Liars who censor the REAL inconvenient truth.

Besides, the whole global warming/climate change thing has been 100% discredited now that the most important so-called "scientists" involved in the whole thing have confessed to destroying the raw data, entailing that it's impossible to check their claims against the facts. Only fools will believe them now. Of course, the emails that've been exposed also destroyed their credibility. So the IPCC can no longer cite those discredited "scientists", who were the ones upon whom the whole IPCC position and "consensus" depended on and who are effectively finished with their careers as scientists now.

Repeat: Only fools and imbeciles will submit to the Big Lies from now on. Fools and imbeciles. Want to be a foolish imbecile? Go ahead. And be looked at as such by those who use their brains and who refuse to believe stuff that's always claimed and never proven.

And the fact that the guy who told WND do PFO doesn't have his facts straight and didn't do proper research into the request for certification only further damns these Copenhagen Climategater folks as they continue delusionally as if nothing had changed, as if they haven't been 100% discredited and debunked. Talk about digging oneself deeper!

Red Cross Rebukes 'Torture' Alleger Colvin

More reason to tell the Leftist Opposition to shut the f... up about non-credible "torture" allegations made by some guy who admits he got the "information" as hearsay from none other than The Enemy.

“What (Richard) Colvin has said publicly has put us in an awkward situation. What he claims to know should not be put out in a public place,” said Eloi Fillion, deputy director of the International Committee of the Red Cross in Afghanistan, where it has a staff of 120 foreigners and 1,500 locals.


“There is a process,” Fillion said. “In our relationship with Canada or any other state, if there is a suspicion that a state representative has committed or is about to commit a war crime or has not behaved properly in international humanitarian law, we would discuss this with the person or persons concerned and report this to his superiors, taking this up to the highest level that we could.

“As regards Canada, this would be represented to the state through the military as well as to the state at home. Our report would go to the highest person in that country’s hierarchical system with responsibility for international humanitarian law.”


Ottawa’s ambassador to Afghanistan, William Crosbie, said Saturday that “nobody” from an international group responsible for the human rights of detainees “has contacted me or anyone at the embassy regarding anything alleging something involving Canadians in Afghanistan.”

Two senior Canadian military officers in Afghanistan who did not wish to be identified because of confidentiality obligations that Canada has with those responsible for detainees’ welfare, said they had never heard of the suspicions that any of their members had violated humanitarian law conventions here.

Richard Colvin has, apparently, zero credibility. He didn't see any evidence. He merely heard rumors/allegations of possible mistreatment, such hearsay, second- and third-hand, coming from folks connected to The Enemy. Colvin, I suspect, might have an agenda of some sort. Of course that question must be investigated. Colvin himself ought to be investigated, considering all the stuff here.

There NO REASON to believe that there has been any "torture". The word of The Enemy is all there is to go on. And Colvin is a fool to trust The Enemy. A big fool.

The Leftist Opposition ought to come up with something credible, or shut up. They're just trying to throw any mud, any shee-it, at the government, in the vain hopes that some of it will cause some voter-esteem damage, hopefully shaking from the Tory tree a few votes to roll their way...

The Leftist Opposition is pathetic and contemptuous. Bunch of monkeys flinging turds, they are!

Again, Those "Experts"

"Experts". You see them mentioned in Big Old Media headlines.

Especially when the story is negative against non-Leftist politicians and governments.

Note the subheading,
"If we don’t have a public service that speaks truth to power we might as well have everything run out of the Prime Minister’s Office.”
Double-take. Feeling of deja-vu. Mentally picturing the Obama Propaganda Machine.

"Truth to power".

Ah. An Obamite slogan.

In Canada.

Obamite "experts" in Canada. Talking American Obammunism talking points. Well, no surprise. After all, I hear that there's actually an ACORN-Canada... you know, a Canadian arm of the child-prostitution/vote fraud/brownshirt-thug-heavy racket who helped Obama get elected!

They sound like... LEFTISTS whom the Big Old Media, for some reason, is calling "experts".

I wonder what these "experts" think of the Obamacrat Reich's unprecedentedly intolerant attitude towards civil servants who "speak truth to power" against the current regime in Washington...

Unfortunately, as we've seen from their militating against the Conservatives after thirteen years of virtually always submitting to whatever the Liberal Reich imposed onto Canada, the public service isn't quite as "independent and non-partisan" as the so-called "experts" want us to believe.

Generally, public servants have been psychologically leftified by the civil-service culture. The Leftist unions see to it that all civil servants are constantly exposed to Leftist ideological imperative. Been there, and experienced the peer pressure to conform. Too many civil servants are simply too Leftist. Shit, I've even been physically assaulted by one obviously mentally-disordered, paranoid, pampered-unionist, entitlist, uber-leftist for simply joking when seeing co-workers hanging around the water-cooler, saying, "Workin' hard, eh?".

So the "experts" really don't know what they're talking about. Some "experts". They just want to bash the Conservatives.

Besides, the diplomat in question, Richard Colvin, is simply spewing second-and-third-hand hearsay from the Enemy whose agenda is obviously to harm Canadian Forces and the Canadian government. Duh! HEARSAY FROM THE ENEMY!

Why take that guy seriously? He himself should be taking ENEMY PROPAGANDA with a grain of salt, not taking it seriously. But he knows that screaming the allegations from the rooftops will give his comrades in the Leftist Opposition a reason to bludgeon the Government. At a time of war, no less!

Who are the supposed "experts"?

A "law professor at the University of Ottawa". Oh. Anyone who's a professor is naturally an "expert". Suuuuure. Riiiiiight. Don't make me laugh so hard! I mean, hey, Obama used to be a professor. And look how gosh-darned knowing-nothing-about-stuff he is! It's a marvel he managed to somehow get into the White House (of course, when you have a billionaire ex-Nazi-collaborator paying millions and millions for all the propaganda and the fake demonstrations and controlling the You-Worshipping Big Old Media)...

And don't forget that Stephane Dion and Michael Ignatieff used to be professors. And look how idiotic these guys have shown us they are. Experts, indeed!

"Dismantling of Canada's public service", the professor alleges? Sure. As if we see evidence of this. Such evidence would be quite extreme, but there's none whatsoever. What a lunatic conspiracy theorist, eh! Why is citing an obvious Left-wing propagandist? They don't have to listen to him any more than they have to listen to critics of Obama. Hell, they could actually attack him as a crackpot, like the Big Old Media attacks Obama's critics!

Besides, he uttered the Obamite slogan, "speak truth to power". Barf-barf!

At least political scientist Don Savoie is more rational and points out that if there's any problem here, it began with the Liberals.

Unionist Ron Cochrane claims that the "substance of what (Colvin) said isn't in dispute". Oh, yes it is, Ronnie! The allegations come from the Enemy, and there's no evidence. Not in dispute, indeed! "Just doing his (Colvin's) job", indeed! And spewing nothing but zero-credibility hearsay without corroborating evidence! That's not his job! I'm speaking truth to the power of the Unions, buddy!

Funny how somebody at thought it fitting to refer to, amongst others, a unionist as an "expert". A unionist! Hey, the now-finally-criminally charged, violent, racist thugs of the Obamacrat Reich-protecting SEIU who beat up a black conservative Tea Party guy are hardly worthy of being called "experts" in anything. We know what kind of folks union activists are.

Speaking of union activists, how about those selfish, greedy healthcare workers, unionized themselves, going on strike and using the sick, injured, suffering... and dying as bargaining tools? That's mean-spirited, hateful and evil! Experts, my ass!

(With empathy for those workers who are actually oppressed victims of unions to which they never did, and still don't, want to belong, as their right to choose with respect to their constitutionally-guaranteed freedom to associate or not associate has not been respected by the Fascist Leftist Powers That Be).

Funny how these Leftist "experts" want us to believe that civil servants are unscrupulous, non-idelogical, non-partisan and would never spew unbelievable bullshit against a Conservative government. Why should we believe that there aren't any corrupt public servants?

After all, remember Chuck Guite? He was nothing less than an accomplice of the Liberals during ADSCAM. And he lied. And he's just the tip of the iceberg.

The government is well within its rights to question the credibility of public servants to make unfounded allegations against it, particularly when it gives a big gift to the Leftist Opposition!

I wish these same "experts" would be similarly critical of the tyrannical Obamacrat Reich!

Sorry,, but while you're better than most of the rest of the Canadian Big Media, you still screwed up with this report. Rethink it.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

WH Gatecrashers, Rashid Khalidi, Bill Ayers And Obama

Obama chumming it up with "gatecrasher couple" in months-old photo.
The guy with the long hair and sunglasses? A Klingon, maybe; who knows?

Here we go again with Obama's scary associations.

This time it's the infamous state-dinner "gatecrasher couple".
The brazen White House party crashers met the President months before they waltzed into the A-list state dinner and now they're seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars for their story.
They're linked to pro-terrorism ideologue Rashid Khalidi.

Rashid Khalidi profile courtesy of Discover the Networks

Khalidi's linked, in turn to, yep, Obama.

Tareq Salahi served on the board of the American Task Force for Palestine, where Columbia University Professor Khalidi served as vice president. The American Power blog noticed both Salahi's and Khalidi's names have been scrubbed from the Task Force website, although Salahi's bio still comes up on a Google cache search of the site.


Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel. He has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.


According to a professor at the University of Chicago who said he has known Obama for 12 years, Obama first befriended Khalidi when the two worked together at the university. The professor spoke on condition of anonymity. Khalidi lectured at the University of Chicago until 2003, while Obama taught law there from 1993 until his election to the Senate in 2004.

Khalidi in 2000 held what was described as a successful fundraiser for Obama's failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, a fact not denied by Khalidi.
The sheer preponderance of various sorts of extremists to whom Obama is undeniably connected, past and present, is staggering. It's alarming that it's not alarming to the Left, including the Big Old Media.

Speaking of the Big Old Media...

RELATED: Flashback: LA Times and the cover-up of the Khalidi-Ayers-Obama video

Oh, and it also involves domestic terrorist and Obama buddy William Ayers
John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, today accused the Los Angeles Times of withholding a videotape of an event that he asserted was attended by both Barack Obama and 1960s-era radical Bill Ayers. The campaign has repeatedly argued that Obama has not been straight about their relationship.

The videotape, described in an April L.A. Times story, was of a 2003 banquet honoring Rashid Khalidi, a leading Palestinian activist and scholar. At the dinner, Obama spoke of their friendship and how much he had learned from him.
John McCain:
“We should know about their relationship including, apparently, information that is held by the Los Angeles Times concerning an event that Mr. Ayers attended with a PLO spokesman,” he told WAQI, also known as Radio Mambi. “The Los Angeles Times refuses to make that videotape public. I’m not in the business about talking about media bias but what if there was a tape with John McCain with a neo-Nazi outfit being held by some media outlet, I think the treatment of the issue would be slightly different.”
Sarah Palin:
“Maybe some politicians would love to have a pet newspaper of their very own,” she said. “In this case we have a newspaper willing to throw aside even the public’s right to know in order to protect a candidate that its own editorial board has endorsed. And if there’s a Pulitzer Prize category for excelling in kowtowing, then the LA Times, you’re winning. But it’s not too late, and if there is an ounce of credibility there, if the newspaper wants to keep that shred of credibility, let alone its dignity, than I say the public has a right to know. Let’s go to the videotape, LA Times.”
Must protect The One at all costs, obviously. The Big Old Media does it very well, doesn't it?

Hypocritical Europeans And The Mass Dolphin Slaughter

So those supposedly sophisticated, queasy-stomached, anti-animal-cruelty Europeans have a problem with Canada's seal hunt?

Well, I wonder if they have a problem with Denmark's mass dolphin slaughter?

And the Europeans are mad at Canada over the seal hunt? Why the hypocrisy?

ht: Jen, via email

Covering Up Inconvenient Truth: Climategate Masterminds Dump Raw Data

Mr. Harper, tear up that $10 billion cheque! That's an order!!!

Destroying the REAL inconvenient truth to protect the Algorean Big Lie

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.


Deliberate fraud. Deliberate coverup. Deliberate deception!

It's a crime. A CRIME!!!

(Click to enlarge and read easily)

"Worst scientific scandal of our generation"

Alarmist "Heat" novelist George Monbiot (from whose name the term "moonbat" was derived!) "shocked, dismayed" at scandal (or so he claims)

Critically serious; cannot pretend irrelevant

(...) Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

They're The Guys, after all, who've told us all those scary things and told us that we're destroying the planet. They're the guys the Hard Left, the Big Old Lying Leftist Media and our politicians have been believing for years and carrying on the Big-Lie-based fearmongering and helping Al Gore and other snake oil (emission trading credits, actually) hawkers line their pockets with millions of dollars.

Professor Philip Jones, the CRU's director, is in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports. Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC's key scientific contributors, his global temperature record is the most important of the four sets of temperature data on which the IPCC and governments rely – not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Dr Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph which 10 years ago turned climate history on its head by showing that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures have recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history.

Given star billing by the IPCC, not least for the way it appeared to eliminate the long-accepted Mediaeval Warm Period when temperatures were higher they are today, the graph became the central icon of the entire man-made global warming movement.





Saturday, November 28, 2009

Liberals Sound Like Broken Record

... or are now taking Chretien-era talking-point advice from their imposed-by-the-elites leader's brand-new Chief of Staff Peter DonOLO.

The more vague and simplistic the propaganda the better. Seems to have worked for the Chretien Liberal Reich.

But that was then.

This is now.

How far do those delusional old fools think they'll get today by recycling the same old meaningless gobbledygook, such as this familiar doozy from Ralph Goodale:

Cardigan MP Lawrence MacAulay said if the party wants success it has to remember its roots.

Oh? What "roots" does he talk about? Good, old-fashioned Classical Liberalism, or the neo-Communist, fascist, extremely divisive, big-government style of so-called "Liberalism", as we saw practiced by Trudeau and Chretien... which Canadians have had enough of, thank you very much!

Besides, the Conservatives now practice real, genuine, authentic classical liberalism.

Why, therefore, do we need fake "liberals", the Liberals, to pretend to be the real classical liberals when we know they aren't?

MacAulay is no stranger to political success. He has won seven elections and has represented the eastern P.E.I. riding of Cardigan for more than 20 years.
Again, that was then. This is now. Canadians have learned from the hardship what is the true nature of the Liberal Party, and the polls show it, and so do all those who stand up and be counted as "former Liberals". They're not going back. In fact, two never-say-die, hardcore partisan Liberal friends of mine are no longer Liberals, expressing, including profanity, the magnitude of disgust with their former comrades as we witnessed in those who fled the Mulroney PCs just prior to their near-death experience in 1993 and the concurrent rise of the Liberal fascist dictatorship of Chretien-Martin which ended up fomenting nothing less than the same amount of disgust and divisiveness, with both Quebec and Western separatism surging like never, never before.

“What I ask the leader and the Liberal party to do is to make sure that we put the policies in place that we have put in place over the last many years,” said MacAulay.

Now you know that they've lost it, when they say they're going to bring back the very policies that led to their defeat and subsequent continuing evisceration of voter esteem and support. They're at their lowest point in history, and they're waxing nostalgic about the "good old days" which actually led to their undoing.

That is perfectly in line with Albert Einstein's famous definition of insanity!

“It’s so important that we keep our true Liberal values, which most people in this country want.”

Again, talk about delusion.

If "most people in this country" wanted those policies, then don't you think they'd indicate so in the polls?

Yep. The Liberals haven't changed, nor has their party.

They're retrograde, change-phobic. They're addicted to the same stuff that's been rejected by the majority of Canadians.

They like to boast that they're "progressive".

But we can tell that they're regressive. Ie. they're sticking to the Left, which the People don't want anymore!

Let 'em carry on as such, though. The more they say, "We're Liberals. We're special. We're almost like gods. We are eternal, immortal. We're The Ones, just like Obama's The One in the States. We're the Natural Governing Party, and we're naturally entitled to rule the nation. Of course we'll be back.", the more they dig past the necessary six feet deep...

Besides, what are these "Liberal Values" of which they speak?

Does anyone have a link to a photograph of the original, and presumedly very-yellowed-and-brittle-by-now, document and text of those famous things? What are they? Where were they first deemed and etched into stone and read by a bearded guy standing on a mountain after coming from a meeting in which the stone tablets were provided to him by the Supreme Overlord of the Left?

I suppose they'll just post online some sort of "Certification Of Liberal Values", or COLV, which claims to condense the original, long-form document which we don't even know to exist, because they won't let us see the damn thing for some bizarre, unstated reason, simply calling us "birthers", "racists" and "crackpots" for asking in the first place! Hmm... sounds familiar... I guess we can therefore conclude that there's no such thing as "Liberal Values", then...

Are "Liberal Values" therefore really just the latest faddish gobbleddygook positions of The Left, such as SSM, which they imposed without a democratic mandate, and the now-exposed-as-a-fraud-and-criminal-conspiracy CLIMATEGATE? I suppose ADSCAM was, at the time it was being commited, a "Liberal Value"?


Re. "Peer-Reviewed"

Story here.

ht: Big Government
The trouble with outsourcing your marbles to the peer-reviewed set is that, if you take away one single thing from the leaked documents, it's that the global warm-mongers have wholly corrupted the "peer-review" process. When it comes to promoting the impending ecopalypse, the Climate Research Unit is the nerve-center of the operation. The "science" of the CRU dominates the "science" behind the United Nations IPCC, which dominates the "science" behind the Congressional cap-and-trade boondoggle, the upcoming Copenhagen shakindownen of the developed world, and the now-routine phenomenon of leaders of advanced, prosperous societies talking like gibbering madmen escaped from the padded cell, whether it's President Barack Obama promising to end the rise of the oceans or the Prince of Wales saying we only have 96 months left to save the planet.

Here's what Phil Jones of the CRU and his colleague Michael Mann of Penn State mean by "peer review". When Climate Research published a paper dissenting from the Jones-Mann "consensus," Jones demanded that the journal "rid itself of this troublesome editor," and Mann advised that "we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers."
Yep. "Peers" is apparently anyone who wears a white coat monogrammed with "Dr." (or something else authorative/scientific sounding that's supposed to necessarily impress the gitchies off of us and make us automatically believe anything and everything they utter), who agrees with what one's peers have claimed.

To have such folks "review" (that could mean anything, like not even looking at the document at all... there's actually NO WAY to verify whether they did anything at all) one's claims and, either following the use of proper scientific examinatory approach ...or NOT..., concur with them, is to have one's claims "peer-reviewed".

What? How dare you ask whether people in white coats could possibly lie, could possibly conspire to defraud, frighten and fool The People into submitting to the most oppressive transformation to ever be imposed upon them against their will? How dare you! I wage jihad against you! Aaaaaahhhhh!
Death to the Deniers! Al Gore is great! The IPCC Paper is The Truth! You will be assimilated! Surrender or be destroyed!

Conspiracy (yes, conspiracy... it's proven with the co-conspirators' own words!) to censor dissenting views and to stick to The Mandatory Political Position at all costs, exactly like Parliamentary MPs/Congressional Reps/Senators being whipped by the Party
So much for Climate Research. When Geophysical Research Letters also showed signs of wandering off the "consensus" reservation, Dr. Tom Wigley ("one of the world's foremost experts on climate change") suggested they get the goods on its editor, Jim Saiers, and go to his bosses at the American Geophysical Union to "get him ousted." When another pair of troublesome dissenters emerge, Dr. Jones assured Dr. Mann, "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" wondered Juvenal: Who watches the watchmen? But the beauty of the climate-change tree-ring circus is that you never need to ask "Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewers?" Mann peer-reviewed Jones, and Jones peer-reviewed Mann, and anyone who questioned their theories got exiled to the unwarmed wastes of Siberia. The "consensus" warm-mongers could have declared it only counts as "peer-reviewed" if it's published in Peer-Reviewed Studies published by Mann & Jones Publishing Inc. (Peermate of the Month: Al Gore, reclining naked, draped in dead polar bear fur, on a melting ice floe), and Ed Begley Jr. and "Andy" Revkin would still have wandered out, glassy-eyed, into the streets droning "Peer-reviewed studies. Cannot question. Peer-reviewed studies. The science is settled ... ."

"Peer-reviewed". Go ahead and submit. Make a fool of yourself. Commit intellectual sin, thus darning yourself to Heck.

But repent and save your soul. You CAN be absolved.

Resistance is good.

Money can't replace your soul.


Norm Spector

(He actually mentions CLIMATEGATE, to his credit, indicating he's not delusionally nuts like those who casually carry on as if the whole AGW/CC thing has not been exposed as a criminal fraud conspiracy, a Big Lie)
Mr Harper has aligned Canada’s position on climate change with that of the United States, our largest trading partner, for sound economic reasons. Given the Clinton Administration’s decision not to submit Kyoto for senate ratification, it also makes sense to wait and see this time whether things evolve differently. And anyone who’s willing to give China and India a pass isn’t truly interested in combating global warming.

This is not to say that it’s not also convenient politically for the Prime Minister to link arms with Mr. Obama, who’s still very popular in Canada. It’s worth noting, however, that Mr. Harper’s political base is not really with him: they’ve for years been fighting the science of global warming and have recently been re-energized by the “Climategate” leaks. To date, however, only Saudi Arabia’s negotiator, Mohammad al-Sabban, has called into question the Copenhagen conference.

Mr. Harper will be facing tremendous heat in the coming weeks. To his good fortune, his approval rating — 51 per cent — is now at an all-time high, higher now than Mr. Obama’s in the United States. Whether he can maintain that approval rating in the coming months remains to be seen, but it seems that, on this issue at least, the Prime Minister is prepared to spend political capital in defending Canada’s interests.

Note that the conservative, mainstream-representing PM Harper is more popular in Canada than the ultra-hard-left-wing Obama is in America. Message to Obama... Dude!!!

Hmm... you know, PM Harper is known as a shrewd political strategist/tactician. I suspect that he knows what he's doing. After all, he was right long ago when he dismissed the whole AGW/CC thing as a "socialist plot". Just as he was right long ago (before his hand was forced by the threat of the undemocratic, far-left, neo-communist coup plot usurping his recently-democratically-elected government to take over and pretty much copy whatever Obama did) when he said there wasn't any need to blow tens of billions of dollars on discredited Keynesian government-interventionist debt-financed spending. After all, look at the results of Obama's blowing trillions of borrowed and printed dollars in America- even more people out of work and more businesses, including banks, collapsing, whilst Canada has done quite ok, thank you very much, indicating, logically and rationally, with the massively opposite results in the two countries, that the unneccessary, ineffective, state-directed "stimulus" spending has had no effect overall in either country, that conservative economic policies, as practiced by the Canadian Conservatives, work, whereas George Soros-dictated Obamanomics does NOT.

Harper can see the light at the end of the tunnel. He can tell that soon the whole thing will be over, and that by having "played along", or really just pretending to do so to manipulate the Big Old Media to quit bashing him all the time on the file, and ultimately just moving on without doing what Al Gore and David Suzuki were demanding (ie. destroy the Canadian economy to please the Axis of Evil and the International Socialist Conspiracy, etc., etc), he'll come out smelling like roses to everyone, having masterfully played for both sides. And, of course, that's what politics is all about, right?

Thank goodness for Mr. Harper. He's safely steering us through and out of the unavoidable Bermuda Triangle of Neo-Communist Insanity, just as he's steered us through the Hard-Left-caused global recession.

Islamization Of 'Best Buy' Creates Firestorm Of Boycottry

Best Buy, the electronics-stuff store chain, hasn't said "Merry Christmas" in its advertisements since trashing the practice in 2006.

All of a sudden, they're saying "Happy Eid al-Adha"!

Christmas is a no-no, but Eid al-Adha is a must. According to Best Buy.

Next thing you know, those e-doodad folks are going to be greeting customers with "Allahu Akhbar!".

Can "Freedom go to hell!" and "Islam will dominate the world!" be far behind?

And the new practice has already begun to impact Best Buy, at least in terms of many folks swearing they won't buy anything from Best Buy now. There's more discussion in Best Buy's own forum here.

Islamization doesn't sell with Mainstream Americana.

America is, believe it or not, a Christian nation, constituted as such, and anyone who has a problem with that can, as a certain Obamacrat Reich minion recently said about the majority of Americans, ie. those Americans who don't like the Reich's decision to pamper 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed with a civilian trial in New York City rather than a proper military trial for mortal enemies of America, go somewhere else.

After all, Christianity is a religion of peace. Islam isn't. We want peace, not jihad, not Islamization.

Send the message with how you use your cash, your debit cards and credit cards. Ie. NOT at Best Buy.

And don't forget to say, "Merry Christmas!" to the Best Buy staff. Just walk in, say it cheerfully and loudly enough for the whole store to hear, and walk out without buying a damn thing.

ht: Big Government and Strange Politics

UPDATE: You know, I just thought to add...


That felt good... aaahhhh... I felt like I just made a big, foul nombre deux... in their bathroom!

LibFascist UMinn Plans To Impose Thought Control, Exclude Independent Thinkers

And makes one wonder whether the Obamacrat Reich's Hidden Fascist Agenda is quietly moving forward...

Do read the whole thing. Basically, it exposes the UMinn as an institution thoroughly posioned with extreme left-wing dogmatic ideology and hellbent on brainwashing both staff and students therewith. And it also plans to vet applicants seeking to be teaching staff and students, grilling/interrogating them as to their current way of thinking to see whether they're "acceptable" for hire or enrollment.

It's like German Nazism, Saudi Arabian Wahhabism, Chinese Communism, etc... Under that, if one dares to think for oneself, one faces torture and execution.

Of course, I doubt that the UMinn plans to torture or execute anyone, but fascism is fascism regardless of whether the fascists are physically violent. Of course, there's also the concepts of intellectual, philosophical, emotional, etc., violence, and Leftists aren't above commiting such terrible things against people, in devout, zealous service of their Leftist faith.

Apparently, the University of Minnesota isn't a university that will teach people to think for themselves.

It's a university that requires complete, unquestioning submission to whatever it tells one.
FIRE's concern included the apparent plan for demands that teachers "discuss their own histories and current thinking drawing on notions of white privilege, hegemonic masculinity, heteronormativity, and internalized oppression."


Further, the letter noted, "the college in its proposal promises to start screening its applicants to make sure they have the proper 'commitments' and 'dispositions.'"

"Here's the kicker," Fire said in its report. "The college even realizes that its efforts to impose such a severe ideological litmus test may be unconstitutional."


"FIRE urges you to consider the Supreme Court's ruling in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), which invalidated mandated allegiances to political ideologies at public schools," Kissel wrote for FIRE.

Writing for the court, Justice Robert H. Jackson declared: "Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. "

Ironically, it's the principle behind such a ruling upon which liberals used to operate.

But now that liberals are in near-absolute power in America (until late 2010, anyway), they've abandoned their former love of the First Amendment. Now they want to abolish it, or at least ignore it, saying it's an "anachronism" that doesn't matter and that poses a roadblock to "progressive" stuff.

Obama Extremist Czar Involved In Climategate Scandal

Al Gore, left, the guy who started the Big Lie, and Obama's appointed scary-extremist "Science Czar" John Holdren

For Canadians, let it be said that CLIMATEGATE makes ADSCAM look kind of small, though the Liberals who perpetuated the latter have infamously bought into the former.

Story here. Emphasis mine.

Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal. In fact, according to files released by a CEU hacker or whistleblower, Holdren is involved in what Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball terms “a truculent and nasty manner that provides a brief demonstration of his lack of understanding, commitment on faith and willingness to ridicule and bully people”.

“The files contain so much material that it is going to take some time t o put it all in context,” says Ball. “However, enough is already known to underscore their explosive nature. It is already clear the entire claims and positions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are based on falsified manipulated material and is therefore completely compromised.

“The fallout will be extensive as material continues to emerge. Reputations of the scientists involved are already destroyed, however fringe players will continue to be identified and their reputations destroyed or sullied.”


“Holdren provides lengthy responses on October 13, 14, and 16 but comments fail to answer Schulz’s questions. After the first response Schulz replies, “I guess my problem concerns what lawyers call the burden of proof. The burden weighs heavily, much more heavily, given the claims on Mann than it does on Soon/Baliunas. Would you agree?” Of course, Holdren doesn’t agree. He replies, “But, in practice, burden of proof is an evolving thing-it evolves as the amount of evidence relevant to a particular proposition grows.” No it doesn’t evolve; it is either on one side or the other. This argument is in line with what has happened with AGW. He then demonstrates his lack of understanding of science and climate science by opting for Mann and his hockey stick over Soon and Baliunas. His entire defense and position devolves to a political position. His attempt to belittle Soon and Baliunas in front of colleagues is a measure of the man’s blindness and political opportunism that pervades everything he says or does.

"...burden of proof is an evolving thing..."

-Thus spake John Holdren, Obama Science Czar.

Reminds me of the time I wrote about the fact that there's no such thing as a "separation of church and state" as allegedly being in the US Constitution. Some weird Leftist commentor tried to screw around with bizarre semantic sophistry and babble about the meaning of the word "thereof", as if doing so would somehow prove that the foregoing passage in the Constitution actually somehow must be interpreted as meaning "separation of church and state". As if the commentor thought I'd be impressed with this sophistic diarrhea and just nod weakly and agree. As if anyone bought Bill Clinton's nonsense of "...depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is...".

Leftists are constantly trying to screw with peoples' heads by uttering fancy-sounding verbal diarrhea as if they know what they're talking about, and insist that because we can't possibly (because it's impossible, and that's their intention) make sense of their so-called "argument", that we must submit to their imposition of dogma. Perhaps they learned that trick from Noam Chomsky, the Ultra-Left-Wing Cunning Linguist Extraordinaire.

Here we go again with Hard-Left delusion. First they wrongly claimed that the Constitution is a "living document". Now they're claiming that the concept of "burden of proof" is an "evolving thing".

Such nonsense, such mental disorder, such arrogance, such delusion. Oh, yeah, whatever those folks say is... is. We must not question... we must acquiesce or else.

Just like the Nazi "intellectuals" and the horrific bullshit they came up with.



Fire. Them. All.

Oh, and by the way, I cannot help but post a picture of Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff demonstrating that he's bought into the Big Lie, himself...

Hey, Michael... I'll be happy to tell you where you can screw that stupid CFL thing in... At least you'll be able to finally see what's inside your butt up inside which you've got your head stuck.

These folks just keep on doing it to themselves, wrongly believing that there can't possibly be any consequences for pushing forward with their arrogant, dogmatic delusions and trying to impose it all on The People against their will, trying to change the lives of The People, whilst refusing to change their own lives...

They might win big for a while, but the truth will come out... and The People, not the Big Old Media, will expose the truth from now on! Let's see... the Obama "Czars" are being exposed, and one already forced to resign (be reassigned, actually)... then ACORN was exposed (and is continuing to get exposed)... then the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas front, the CAIR gets exposed in the explosive bestseller "Muslim Mafia"...


And the story has just begun...

We've barely scratched the surface of the tip of the iceberg, which, by the way, has apparently been melting for millenia, not just since we started using incandescents and driving cars, not that anyone ever proved that doing those things makes any difference whatsoever.

'Climategate' Fraud Awareness Spreading

Surely you're aware that the whole "global warming/climate change/carbon-emissions-bad" thing has been exposed as a Big Lie as a con of historic international magnitude.

Story here.
(...) the real car crash for Obama is on Capitol Hill where it is now confidently believed his Cap and Trade climate legislation is toast. It was always problematic; but with a growing awakening to the scale of the scientific imposture sweeping the world, as far as the Antipodes, the clever money is on Cap and Trade laws failing to pass, with many legislators sceptical and the mid-term elections looming ever closer.
Inconvenient truth and reality are weighing heavily on the parties to the Big Lie.
At this rate, Copenhagen is going to turn into a comedy convention with the real world laughing at these liars. Now is the time to mount massive resistance to the petty tyrants and hit them where it hurts – in the wallet. Further down the line there may be, in many countries, a question of criminal prosecution of anybody who has falsified data to secure funds and impose potentially disastrous fiscal restraints on the world in deference to a massive hoax. It’s a new world out there, Al, and, as you may have noticed, the climate is very cold indeed.
Speaking of criminal prosecution, I'd give a shout-out to the hypocritical-extremist-fraudster David Suzuki, the respected-scientist-turned-reviled-political-extremist...

Remember when David Suzuki said:
"What I would challenge you to do is to put a lot of effort into trying to see whether there's a legal way of throwing our so-called leaders into jail because what they're doing is a criminal act,"
David Suzuki.... speak for yourself and your cronies!

I hate being lied to by powerful, propaganda-power-wielding poopheads. Don't you?

Speaking of lying poopheads, did they ever prove to you that Obama proved, with valid documentary proof, not alleged "birth certificates" posted online, that he is eligible according to the Constitution to be President?

Who's got the credibility now? The so-called "Birthers", who actually, when you carefully examine the evidence and lack thereof, DO have a strong case... or the Climategaters who've been demonstrated, with their own written words, to be Big Liars and utter frauds?

Now excuse me... I've got to go spew lots and lots of carbon, with arrogant impunity... to hell with the Chicken Littles whose real agenda is to destroy the Free World's economy by taking away its ability to cost-efficiently use energy to run it. Whilst allowing the Axis of Evil to do whatever the hell it wants with spewing carbon.

I feel vindicated. I know my mind isn't shut like a "rusty steel trap", just because I refuse to buy into obvious Big Lies.

Ultra-Left Liberal Brison Forced To Apologize For Hateful Slur

Liberal Scott Brison

I see a "teachable moment" arising here...

Remember when he hatefully told a woman to kiss his ass?


Hypersensitive, foulmouthed, out-of-control, insult-spewing rude Liberal MP Scott Brison has done it again.
"There’s a pavilion," shouted Mr. Brison, suggesting that Mr. Del Mastro was a pavilion himself.


Mr. Brison is the second Liberal MP to have to apologize for commenting on Mr. Del Mastro’s girth. Two weeks ago, Scarborough Liberal MP Michelle Simson sent a tweet — an online message — during a committee meeting: "M.P. Del Mastro should grow up (not out)."
Second Liberal to attack the same Conservative on the basis of a medical condition which he's been working on fixing... My, but aren't those Liberals soooo grownup and tolerant themselves?

You know, if a Conservative, even, say, fourteen years ago, had said something not-nice about gay folks or something mean about Scott himself, highlighting his homosexual preferences, Scott might not necessarily accept an apology graciously and "move on". I suspect he'd, like many of his Liberal (plus fellow-traveller/useful-idiot NDP and Bloc-Q ultra-leftist) cronies, use it to paint the entire Conservative party as "Neanderthal, hairy-knuckle-dragging bigots and rednecks" and would demand that the offending Tory MP be fired and would say to voters, "don't vote for those guys- they're horrible monsters who hate everybody!".

So next time Scott finds himself being insulted for anything, including his lifestyle choices, he must remember how he felt whilst being under pressure for uttering a hateful slur himself and hoping that he won't get into too-deep shit as a result.

Remember, Scott, the Golden Rule...

Next time you're talking in the House about fruit (the food, mind you... don't be so paranoid, eh!), Scott, and someone says, "Look who's talking about fruit!", I'd hope you'd accept their apology for being momentarily rude and poopheaded just as you hope that Mr. Del Mastro accepts yours for being a momentarily rude poophead yourself and calling him a "pavilion".

By the way, Scott, have you forgiven Mr. Lukiwski for what he said about fourteen years ago on a drunken party tape? You know, the poopheaded "homosexual faggots" utterance? Have you forgiven him? Well, if you're forgiven for hatefully slurring a larger individual as a "pavilion", then you'd better be sure to forgive Mr. Lukiwski... I'd really not want you to expose yourself as a double-standard-practicing hypocrite, Scott!

And did you ever apologize to the woman you nastily told to "kiss your ass"?

Speaking of asses, Scott, please put on some pants! And standing like that in front of an open fridge won't make you look good if you've none on!

Liberal Scott Brison exposes himself again.
This time...
Must've been in David Miller's Toronto...

Friday, November 27, 2009

Toronto Humane Society Exposed As Grossly Negligent

Live-trapped, now-dead kitty found at Toronto Humane Society

ht: NNW

"That's dry as a bone, it has to have been there for over a year," the agent who found the cat said. "Maggots have been there and then have left."

"I've been an investigator for 15 years but that sent a chill right down my spine when I saw that," said OSPCA officer Kevin Strooband.

"This is unbelievable. I'm still reeling ... This is a house of horrors."

He said his team was confronted by a number of dehydrated and diseased animals after raiding the facility Thursday. Some of the cases included cats with ulcers in their eyes and mouths. Others suffered extreme dehydration and malnutrition, he said.
What's the matter with the folks at the THS?

Cuban socialized medicine for Cuban people no better than the "healthcare" animals received at the Toronto Humane Society

This reminds me of the socialized, so-called "universal" healthcare system of Cuba, incredibly delusionally supposed by the Left and the Big Old Media to be "excellent" and "to be emulated".

The one for actual Cubans, not the good stuff for foreigners visiting and seeking modern, state-of-the-art treatment at new, state-of-the-art facilities, where actual Cubans are forbidden to go...

It all sounds great... until you actually visit the facility and are shocked by the truth!

When people say they care, how do we know they're not lying with a straight face?

And how come we're seeing the Big Old Media eager to report on bad animal-"care" facilities, but not willing to investigate, for themselves, and report the inconvenient truth about, socialized, "universal" healthcare systems like Cuba's, which is incorrectly advertised as being excellent and desirable, but which is hardly any better than what animals get at the Toronto "Humane" Society.

The Real World isn't always as we're told it is.

Speaking of which, have you heard the gobbleddygook the Left and the Big Old Media have been trying to get us to believe about Obamacare?

And I know, from firsthand, extensive observation-in-person, that the Canadian socialized healthcare system is falling apart, is getting worse and worse and worse, notwithstanding the billions and billions of dollars of new funding constantly being shovelled on top of the amounts already being eaten up by the Bureaucrat-Run System.

Tories The 'Stauncher' Defender Of Israel: Coyne

Commentary here. Read it all, to see how brutally fair he's being to both sides. Herein, I excerpt the parts that I'd use in arguing against the Liberal crybaby hypocrites.

ht: NNW
What did the Tory literature (“these vile flyers”—the Toronto Star), widely distributed in Liberal ridings with large numbers of Jewish voters, actually say? Not that the Liberal party was anti-Jew, or even anti-Israel, but only that it had not been as robust in the defence of Israel as the Tories have been.

This seems to me an entirely plausible, even obvious point. Indeed, at the time of the Israeli intervention in Lebanon, back in 2006, that was the Grits’ chief complaint—that the Tories, by siding so firmly with Israel in its campaign against Hezbollah, had departed from the Liberals’ traditional “balanced” approach in the Middle East; that they had forsaken Canada’s alleged historic role as “honest broker” in the region.

(...) if the question is who has in fact been the stauncher supporter, it hardly strikes me as controversial to conclude it’s the Tories, still less the outrageous libel the Liberals would have you believe.

Again, it's all about the truth, folks. And the truth always hurts the Liberals, so is it any wonder they go crying to the Big Old Media and to the Speaker, who himself seems to be absent-minded and wholly without realistic-and-fair perspective on his ruling against the Tory flyers.

Coyne also says:
The Tory pamphlet is harsh, simplistic, perhaps tendentious in places. But it is well within the accepted bounds of political debate, particularly as it has evolved in Canada.
Exactly. The Tory pamphlet doesn't go "beyond the pale", not like the Liberal attack ads do ("Soldiers. With guns. In the streets."- Remember that? Plus the Liberals waste no opportunity to illogically, insanely scream, "Look! See! Raaaaaacists!" Whenever the Tories reasonably disagree with the Liberals on politically correct stuff.)

Too bad most folks in the Big Old Media are too simple-minded compared to Andrew Coyne.

Is it any wonder that the best minds in the Big Old Media tend towards the conservative side of the spectrum?

The Tories don't have any lessons to take from Speaker Peter Milliken on this file. The Speaker is obviously having a brainfart. Too bad there's no higher Speaker to whom to appeal his very surprising, dumbassed ruling that the flyers are somehow unacceptable.

And don't forget that the Liberals aren't really supporters of Israel. Not as a party, that is. So those who support Israel have this to consider when voting. Who really stands up for Israel, the Tories or the Liberals? I think it's obvious.

Ok, time for a quick rant, inspired by the foregoing stuff...

The Liberals are only interested in POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and in adhering to whatever faddish far-left nonsense is in the air at any given time, because they're constantly looking for ways to fool left-leaning voters into thinking the Liberal Party is "all that" and really cares about anything or anyone at all.

Remember, the Liberals are really only making calculations as to which position might be expected to win the most votes from which constituencies. They know that since the Left is generally anti-Israel and anti-REAL-Jewish, that they better not be seen as being too-staunch supporters of the Good Guy in the Middle East, Israel, the only Jewish-founded nation on earth.

Sure, many who consider themselves to be Jews (mostly really just because they come from Jewish families, not necessarily because they're devout and follow the tenets of the faith) are Leftist. But anyone who's a Leftist, regardless of their professed faith (Judaism, Catholicism, etc., etc...), well, we've seen them betray their own professed faith over and over again, ie. with the pro-abortion stuff and the pro-homosexual-marriage stuff, for example, both of which are forbidden by their faiths.

We see folks claiming to be Jewish going to demonstrations against Israel, even demanding the downfall of Israel. I'd say to take those folks with a grain of salt. I prefer to talk to those who genuinely adhere to their faith, because they're more trustworthy, essentially, because of this, and one knows they'll take the right position, even if if means to go against political correctness and the Left. In other words, those who say they will put politics ahead of their faith when it comes to such things as abortion and gutting the institution of marriage... they cannot be trusted, obviously, and can be expected to vote according to nothing other than political correctness, ie. what the Left demands at any given moment.

It's as if their true "religion" is to submit to the Left. Ah- it is, actually! What makes me mad is that they turn the Peoples' legislative buildings into their de-facto "Church of the Left", and, on many issues, as Leftists, vote according to nothing other than Political Correctness "Gospel". When they do this, they destroy democracy!

They will vote against the wishes of the majority in order to serve their Leftist faith. This destroys democracy. And the worst of those Leftists are those who falsely profess to be whatever established religion they claim. Seems to me they treat their professed churhces, synagogues, etc. (if they even bother to go), as nothing more than social meeting places and the rituals, etc., as nothing more than tradition, pomp and circumstance, something lovely and quaint and pleasant and relaxing to witness, plus a place where you get married and hold funerals. Their real "church" happens to be such a building like Parliament, the Capitol, etc., where they practice their actual "faith", the faith in the Left.

Just like the Kennedys in America. They profess to be Catholic, but, really, their Catholicism is a delusion. They're extraordinarily un-Catholic in the positions they push whilst in office. They needn't push these positions, especially as they're demanded only by fringe minorities of citizens, not the majority whom they're supposed to listen to, for the sake of democracy. Nevertheless, they're always pushing un-Catholic stuff, with shockingly unquestioning zeal, proving that their adherence to the Left-Wing-Extremist faith is far, far, far stronger than their professed faith in God and Jesus and the Bible. Just witness the Obamacrats voting for the unwanted-by-most-Americans Obamacare bill and demanding that it enshrine in law taxpayer funding of abortion. Just like Patrick Kennedy, who, for this zealousness, is in hot Holy Water with his professed Church, who knows he's being zealously un-Catholic. See what I'm talking about?

There's nothing wrong with opposing abortion and opposing the changing of the institution of marriage to something it isn't. Nothing wrong at all. One doesn't have to vote to appease Left-wing extremists. So those who profess to be or actually are of a particular faith SHOULDN'T, NEEDN'T feel that they HAVE to submit to the minority LEFTIST point of view when voting on legislation. They CAN vote according to their faith, especially when backed by the mainstream/majority of the People. But just watch LEFTIST politicians prove that, rather than being Catholic, Jewish, whatever, as they claim... that they really aren't, except in delusion, and are actually Neo-Communist Useful Idiots.

You know, the majority, the mainstream... really DON'T want the Left to impose its views on them!

OPP Confiscates Anti-Occupation Protestor's Cdn Flag In Illegally-Occupied Caledonia

A Caledonia resident being set upon by police for carrying a Canadian flag past the occupied site that was shown in court on Thursday

Oh-oh Canada

Well, that's McGuinty Liberal Ontario again.

How long has the illegal, unconstitutional Aboriginal-Supremacist occupation of Caledonia been going on now? Three years?

Now we find that the Ontario Provincial Police has been confiscating Canadian flags.

WTF? The Canadian flag is now illegal in Ontario? Or just in Occupied-by-Aboriginal-Supremacists Caledonia?
The first video (the fourth video on this external website) shows Caledonia resident Randy Fleming walking down the side of Argyll Street South last Victoria Day -- May 24, 2009 -- with a Canadian flag tied to a stick slung over his left shoulder. He saunters on to the edge of the occupied site, at which point he is grabbed by a black-clad OPP officer, escorted a few metres off the site, and is then pounced on by several other officers.

An officer is seen taking the flag from Mr. Fleming, quickly rolling it up and handing it to another officer, who rushes away with it.
(Emphasis mine)

The OPP, of course, is JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS. Whose orders, ultimately? Guess.


In the second video (the first video on this external website), taped on July 15, 2009, native protesters carrying Warrior Society flags and Six Nations flags walked down the middle of the street, followed by a number of pickup trucks, some draped with Warriors flags and signs.

The native march had an OPP escort -- with a cruiser, its lights flashing, slowly driving behind the marchers. As the last of the marchers enters the occupied site, an officer is seen talking with them and gives a wave as he gets into his cruiser to leave.

Are Aboriginal Supremacists being given the run of the land already?

What the hell is the McGuinty Liberal Regime doing?

Next thing you know, they're going to be flying the Hezbollah flag in Ontario, and the police will do nothing.

Oh, wait...

Welcome to McGuinty Liberal Ontario, where Canadians must submit to terrorists or the police will haul y'all away.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

You Know It's Over For Obama When...


Yo! Lookee me! I'm President, and I'm soooo cooool!
I'm soooo totally hot shee-it!
I'm the Wiz, and nobody beats me!
Life's good! Hey, there! How ya doin'?! many of his own folks turn against him in anger and disgust.

And that follows on the heels of polls indicating that the majority of Americans don't like Obama as "President".

Yup. It's bad. Very, very, very bad for Obama.

animated_elaine.gif Elaine Dance image by bigmikek7
He started out trying to be everything to everybody.

Now it's clear that he's nothing to anyone.

KramerDance.gif Kramer Dancing image by DivineDragoon23

He's the Kramer, the Mr. Bean, the Goofy, the little-kicking Elaine Benes, the Mr. Magoo, the Lieutenant Frank Drebin of Presidents.

He's got some great moves, sure.

Too bad it doesn't mesmerize many folks anymore. They want substance, results, not hey-lookit-me-I'm-cool nonsense.

dancing-bean.gif mr bean image by dundalknimble

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Palin Inspires More Moms To Run For Office

Feminists rejoice! More women, including MOMS, running for office! Isn't that what you wanted?
The 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate's conservative philosophies and her folksy, hockey-mom approach to politics have galvanized other mothers to launch political campaigns -- at all levels of government -- aimed at reducing big-government spending.


"She doesn't put herself up in an ivory tower and say 'I know what's best for you,'" Carter said, adding that she thinks Palin was "mishandled" last year by both the McCain campaign and the Republican National Committee.

"She was sort of put into a box, and her true spirit and her passion were not allowed to really shine through," she said. "She wasn't just a pretty picture standing next to John McCain."

Finally Americans can get to know Sarah Palin. Her opponents can't be burning through millions of dollars a day, 365 days a year, buying expensive propaganda advertising, trying to destroy her public image with horrible smears, after all. Even George Soros wouldn't try that!

Islam's Horrific Cruelty To Women Exposed In Pictures

First of all, not all Muslims are horrible, hateful, violent monsters; certainly not.

There are certainly plenty of good, peaceful, non-supremacist, tolerant, Reformist Muslims, indeed, who want to get rid of the hatred, inequality, intolerance, torture and murder that are still a very, very big part of worldwide Islam even today and that continue to spread, rather than dissipate according to the invalid Leftist theory of "progressivism". We need to accept that there's a very, very critically serious, and fast-growing, problem everywhere with fundamentalist, ancient-style Islam spreading at a dangerous rate across the world, so that we can help the Reformists to combat and eliminate this ancient, unacceptably hateful and dangerous fundamentalist-literalist ideology, or at least to prevent it from spreading further.

We don't want white supremacism/neo-Nazism and violent "homophobia" to spread, do we? Of course not!

Well, we don't want Islamofascism to spread, either!


Think you know about Islam from what you've been told by the media, by politicians, by your "progressive" peers, and by Muslim propagandists?

Think it's a gentle faith, a peaceful faith? Think there's nothing nasty at all about it?

Well, here's, in uncensored, shocking color photographs, what Islam does to women.

Any hard-left, lazy-minded feminist readers here? Care to comment? Want to wax denial and call me an "Islamophobe" for simply reporting the truth?

Think these are just rare instances, the pictures at the link? Well, I'm afraid that this happens a lot, all the time. Women suffer horrendously throughout the Islamic World, each and every day. They're treated like animals, because that's precisely how fundamentalist Islam and Shariah Law regard women.

Women have ZERO RIGHTS, NO EQUALITY, under Islam.

And this ideology is coming here, with many, many Islamists who are commited to fundamentalist-literalist Islam, not to the country to which they're immigrating, nor to its constitution, bill of rights, culture, customs, laws, etc.

Ok, again, the obligatory: Not all Muslims are like this, but a LOT are... too many, in fact... way too many are like this. Ok? That's out of the way, then. Again. *Sigh*.

This is why we hear and read about Islamic "honor killings" of girls and women by their own families. Right here at home. Not in Iran/Pakistan/Saudi Arabia, etc., only, but everywhere in the world now. Yet no alarm is being raised, no efforts are being taken to protect Islamic women from the rapidly spreading hate and violence by Islamists.

Didn't you know? Or are you solely dependent on what the Big Old Politically Correct Newsmedia tells you, on what politicians tell you, on what the schools tell you, on what Islamic propagandists tell you?

Why doesn't our supposedly civilized, egalitarian society wake up to the horrific reality of the Islamic hatred and violence against women everywhere?