Thursday, January 31, 2008

Kinsella Caught?

Warren Kinsella

Remember this post?

Well, it appears that Kate has caught him. Warren, being a Leftist, didn't see this coming.

Check out these comments:

In your opinion, does Kate McMillan defend anti-Semites like David Icke?
[ ] Yes[ ] Yes

Posted by: Curious at January 30, 2008 8:26 PM

Oddly enough, the only other time that "curious" has commented from that ip address, it was to ask the question "Kate, is it true you sent come hither emails to Kinsella?" - on Dec.5. It was held for moderation, as the user signed my name to it. I bet you didn't expect to get caught, eh Warren?

Posted by: Kate at January 30, 2008 8:57 PM

Kate, are you kidding me? Kinsella's got nothing better to do than send lame-o trolls to SDA under pseudonyms? That's amazing. Gawd what a Loser!

Posted by: The
at January 31, 2008 12:41 AM

I'm not kidding you. I'm beginning to suspect his wife supports him. With the time he has to spend on sock puppetry, the client list at this Daisy Group effort must fit on a Post-It Note.

Posted by: Kate at January 31, 2008 12:47 AM

The Pauper of Dim Light has once again been bested!

Bloggers Get Results! MP Hears Us, Takes Bold Action For Our Rights & Freedoms

Dr. Keith Martin, Canadian MP, a real human rights champion

Story here.

Bravo, Keith!

(Yes, he is currently a Liberal, actually, but what he's doing isn't something his current party of affiliation is, I'm afraid, likely to unanimously welcome, to put it mildly)

Keith Martin, a Liberal MP from Victoria, has introduced a private member's bill that is as groundbreaking as it is concise:

That, in the opinion of the House, subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act should be deleted from the Act.

This is important for several reasons:

1. It's evidence that the "undernews" of the abusive, unaccountable conduct of the human rights commissions has caught the attention of at least one MP (we can assume Sen. Anne Cools is watching things, too).

2. That MP is a socially progressive Liberal (formerly a red Reformer), whose human rights credentials with the Left are impeccable. Not only has he made international human rights one of his causes in Parliament, but he has personally walked the talk, serving on various Doctors Without Borders missions.

(There's more...)

Read it all for yourself!!!

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Man Caught Inciting Hatred, Murder of Cdn Soldiers

Here's a dangerous, hateful guy for Richard Warman to haul before the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission for spewing hate online!

Why doesn't he shut that guy up, too? Surely promoting murder is far worse than republishing a few pictures of some dude named "Mohammed"?!

Alarm bells about the online writings went off last September after German authorities arrested three Islamic militants accused of planning to bomb the Ramstein Air Base and Frankfurt International Airport.

That same day, Salman Hossain posted several messages about the plot on the comment board of a Toronto-based Internet site where he is a frequent contributor.

Although Mr. Hossain claimed in one of his communications with the National Post that he made the comments in a private online chat room, the messages can easily be viewed by anyone using a simple Google search.

"I hope the German brothers were gonna blow up US-German bases in their country. We should do that here in Canada as well. Kill as many western soldiers as well so that they think twice before entering foreign countries on behalf of their Jew masters," he wrote.

Not only did he promote murdering as many Western soldiers as possible in Canada, he also dared to utter the Judeophobic slur "Jew masters"! That cannot be tolerated either, and neither Richard Warman, nor the CJC, with whom he works very closely, are known for ignoring such a hateful slur as that.

So, Richie baby, there's your next meal ticket! Go get the scumbag, baby! Take his rights away, too! Take his money away, too! Ruin his life, too! How dare someone even feel hatred at all? Gotta eradicate all hate everywhere no matter what it takes, man! Sicc'em, dude! You da man!

Don't hold your breath. Like hell Richard Warman would bother to go after Salman Hossain!

Another Excellent Post By Ezra Levant

He makes many excellent points. Well worth your time to read.

Ezra makes the Far Left's nonsensical, psychobabbly sophistry about "hate crimes" crumble into a pile of ashes like Wile E. Coyote after being caught in a firestorm.

It's also impossible to disagree with his points regarding all those hateful, inciteful Islamofascists not being charged with "hate crimes". Isn't it ironic that the very sort of unsavory characters who ought to be hauled before the CHRC by the likes of unsavory character Richard Warman and demonized by unsavory character "Borin' Warren" Kinsella... are getting away with spewing not only hatred, but also incitement to murder?

Many inconveniently true, valid points are raised which will sting the Far Left. And further discredit the whole concept of the so-called Canadian "Human Rights" Commission, which the reasonable person will conclude to be an instrument of discriminatory censorship run by Liberal Fascists who are currently permitted to operate in blatant violation of the Constitution Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, taking rights and money away from certain folks they hate and want to shut up as inconvenient to their frightening, dangerous revolutionary Far-Left agenda.

Oh, and, in my opinion, we really do need to get rid of such fascist entities as the CHRC, for, should they continue to be permitted to operate to take away peoples' rights as they've been for so long, well, history teaches us about a certain precedent, in which the next logical step will be to imprison the victims of this kangaroo court. And then, after that, executions would be the next logical step. And the Far Left would probably look the other way, deny it happens, or justify it somehow, motivated by their own seething hatred for people who simply exercise their rights or beg to differ, as is their right to do so, such a right being inconvenient to and intolerable by the Far Left. They, after all, justify abortion and look the other way on the Communists' and Islamists' persecution of inconvenient, hated individuals and groups, including imprisonment, torture and execution...

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Cannabis Much More Carcinogenic Than Tobacco: Study

Story here.

Smoking a joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer risk, scientists in New Zealand have found, as they warned of an "epidemic" of lung cancers linked to cannabis.

Studies in the past have demonstrated that cannabis can cause cancer, but few have established a strong link between cannabis use and the actual incidence of lung cancer.

In an article published in the European Respiratory Journal, the scientists said cannabis could be expected to harm the airways more than tobacco as its smoke contained twice the level of carcinogens, such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons, compared with tobacco cigarettes.


"In the near future we may see an 'epidemic' of lung cancers connected with this new carcinogen. And the future risk probably applies to many other countries, where increasing use of cannabis among young adults and adolescents is becoming a major public health problem."

Of course, many Leftists do tend to engage in self-destructive behaviors, and, due to its inconvenience to them, it's doubtful they'll accept this study.

Leftists will reject what they find inconvenient to their dissociative, self-absorbed, manic-depressive hedonism.

Taliban Leader A Former 'Bearded Lady' Circus Freak?

Could it be...?

Warman Narrowed Complaint Scope To Protect Self: Fournier

Richard Warman, above, tried to cover his own ass by narrowing the scope of his complaint to exclude the hateful posts which are believed, from credible, compelling evidence, to have been written by himself.
Below: His strongest backer and "I advise you to retain counsel" intimidation hitman, Warren "Prince of Darkness" Kinsella, himself a Leftwing radical militant extremist like Mr. Warman

Remember this damning exposure of Liberal Fascist aggressor Richard Warman, a phony "human rights" champion?
A good post is now up at SmallDeadAnimals... "What benefit can there be in allowing him to speak?"
Connie Fournier, one of those targeted by Warman's zealous censorship jihad, of writes in the comments at SmallDeadAnimals:

Initially the Anne Cools post was part of the CHRC complaint against Lemire because Warman said specifically that ALL of the posts on the Freedomsite forum were included in the complaint.

When he found out that Lemire's lawyer had the Cools post and that they were going to try to prove he made it, he not only moved to quash the Roger's subpoena, but he also narrowed down the posts that were to be included in the investigation and he excluded the Cools post (which was clearly hate speech). He then argued that the Cools post could not be discussed in the hearing because it was not part of the complaint.

This is not what one would expect an innocent man to do in this situation.

It is my understanding that Lemire's lawyer did eventually win the fight to subpoena Rogers, but their log files for that time were no longer in existence.

Suspicious commentor Neo says:

sounds a little suspect to me. i worked mainframe ops for big canadian companies... including a major bank... you have to keep computer backup tapes for seven years for audit purposes.

you're saying rogers didn't?

My, my, my... indeed, Richard Warman's actions certainly help us to believe that he has nothing to hide, that he's done nothing illegal/hateful... oh, yep; indeedy! Suuuure!

Obama Foreign Advisor Wants Talks With, Aid To Hamas

Continuing to look more closely at the mysterious, self-aggrandized Change Agent You Can TrustTM...
We already know that Hillary Clinton, the other front-runner for the US Democratic Presidential Nomination, is a Communistic Liberal Fascist. But...

Who is Barack Obama, really? What do Americans really know about him?

JERUSALEM – While officials here largely maintain a policy against interfering in U.S. election politics, some Israeli security officials quietly expressed "concern" about an adviser to Sen. Barack Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

The officials noted Robert Malley, a principal Obama foreign policy adviser, has penned numerous opinion articles, many of them co-written with a former adviser to the late Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat, petitioning for dialogue with Hamas and blasting Israel for numerous policies he says harm the Palestinian cause.

Malley also previously penned a well-circulated New York Times piece largely blaming Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000 when Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and eastern sections of Jerusalem and instead returned to the Middle East to launch an intifada, or terrorist campaign, against the Jewish state.

Malley's contentions have been strongly refuted by key participants at Camp David, including President Bill Clinton, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and primary U.S. envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross, all of whom squarely blamed Arafat's refusal to make peace for the talks' failure.


"We are noting with concern some of Obama's picks as advisers, particularly Robert Malley who has expressed sympathy to Hamas and Hezbollah and offered accounts of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations that don't jibe with the facts," said one security official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Well, now we know something unpleasant about Obama's foreign policy advisor.

If elected President, would Obama pursue anti-Israel/anti-Semite policies? One must ask. After all, Obama's own pastor is known for his praise of the anti-Semitic, racist, Islamosupremacist-imperialist leader of Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan, such praise not being denounced by Obama.

The more I find out the facts surrounding Barack Obama, the more I'm concerned about the prospect of him becoming the President of the United States of America and de-facto Leader of the Free World (although with the company he keeps, one wonders whether he's being advised to keep it free, or change it into something else).

Monday, January 28, 2008

Woman On Trial For Microwaving Baby

This is horrendously evil.

May face death penalty for horrendous murder

Most people have no idea that abortion is just as horrendously evil a mode of infanticide as death by microwave oven. The baby, which is as human as you and I, does suffer, and suffers horrendously. It's ironic to the max that the Far Left opposes waterboarding evildoers to make them provide information that will prevent the suffering of others, but they couldn't care less about the evil, inhumane torture-to-the-death of unborn human beings. Dogmatically, delusionally telling themselves and each other that someone who is human somehow isn't, doesn't change the truth! It's reminiscent of genocidal Nazi ideology. Such ideologies have this in common: If a certain kind of person is inconvenient, then declare them "not-a-person" and get rid of them. Such evil the Far Left embraces!

Wrongly calling it a "right to choose" doesn't change the truth, either! No one has a right to choose whether someone lives or dies. After all, the Far Left ironically opposes the death penalty. They think it's ok to torture and murder the innocent unborn, but not evildoers, just because they think the evildoers might've been wrongly convicted, therefore killing them would be wrong. They can't justify this damning inconsistency.

Abortion is torture-murder in the name of ameliorating inconvenience and making money.

Abortion is inhumane to the unborn baby. But the Far Left justifies it in terms of "removing inconveniences" for women and because it's extremely profitable for abortionists, and also the payments for abortions are frequently under the table/off the books and in cash only, unreported to the taxman, who apparently leaves the greedy, criminal abortionists alone despite their tax evasion crimes.

Abortion clinics exist because abortion is very profitable. They wouldn't do it if it wasn't.

It's not about imaginary "rights to choose". It's about money. And the abortionists are behind the abortion movement, really, for making money makes corrupt people do corrupt, even evil, things to make money.

It's evil, immoral, unethical, wrong, inhuman, hateful and mean-spirited to justify murder by saying that "choice" in this particular matter of inconvenience to some people is more important than the right to life of all innocent human beings.

Actually, we know in our hearts that right to life is more important than selfishly choosing to terminate human life to get rid of inconvenience. After all, it's what the Nazis did. It's what Communists do. It's what Islamofascists do. Abortion isn't any different.

And people know this. No wonder we never hear of anyone having an abortion. Nope- when we know someone's pregnant, we always hear of them having the baby, not having an abortion. Because, despite submitting to politically correct public speech vis-a-vis "a woman's right to choose" and similar Liberal Fascist nonsense, most people realize that abortion is a horrible, evil, wrong thing to do.

It's clear that the Far Left considers human life to be an inconvenience. We see the evidence of this all the time.

Yes, unborn babies are human, too. How dare the Far Left and the greedy abortion "doctors" deem otherwise? Who the hell are they, Joseph Mengele?

Levant Still Won't Submit To Liberal Fascism, Nor Radical Imam

Ezra Levant, freedom fighter and human rights champion, is continuing to fight Liberal and Islamic Fascism.

Mr. Levant's aggressor, radical Imam Syed Soharwardy, recently threatened a "defamation" suit against him...

To which Mr. Levant responded... and I particularly like the way he used the word "proctological" (with respect to his "discovery of Soharwardy") in his response. Essentially, Ezra's pretty much said, "Bring it on! I'm ready to roll!"

US DOJ Offers Rewards For Wanted Terrorists, But Issued No Warrants

WTF?! They want to capture terrorists and have earmarked millions in reward money for anyone who helps in their capture. But they can't arrest the terrorists even if they have their hands on them, as they haven't issued any warrants for their arrest. Whose idea of a sick joke is this?!

“The Justice Department has placed a $5 million reward for any information leading to Adnan’s apprehension, and the same bounty for each of his alleged accomplices: Amer el-Maati, Jaber A. Elbaneh, Anas al-Liby and Abderraouf Jdey,” says Williams. “But if you assemble a team of bounty hunters and manage to collar Adnan el-Shukrijumah and his terrorist cronies, you will be hard-pressed to turn them over to law enforcement officials, let alone collect the aggregate $25 million,” says Williams.

“The U.S. Department of Justice, even after posting rewards, setting up hotlines, and issuing BOLOs (“Be-on-the-Lookout” alerts) has failed to issue criminal warrants for their arrest. This means that the bounty hunters would have to leave Adnan and his friends strapped to lawn chairs, since members of state and local police departments remain without authorization to detain or question them, let alone take them into custody.”


FBI Director Robert Mueller and former Attorney General John Ashcroft have called Adnan el Shukrijumah “the next Mohammed Atta”, who represents “a clear and imminent danger to all Americans.”

That the U.S. Department of Justice has failed to issue a criminal warrant for the arrest of “the next Mohammed Atta” is as mind boggling as it is chilling.

“Adnan el Shukrijumah has allegedly worked with Mohammad Atta and the other 9/11 operatives; he has allegedly masterminded a plan to launch a nuclear attack on American soil; he has allegedly attended leading al Qaeda gatherings, including the Waziristan Summit of 2004; he has allegedly conspired with Jose Padilla and others to blow up bridges and infrastructures in New York City; and the search for his present whereabouts is allegedly littered with corpses, including that of prominent Guyanese businessman Farouk Razak,” says Williams. “Obtaining the necessary warrants would constitute the perfunctory matter of submitting a request to a federal judiciary. But
this basic procedural step was not undertaken by the U.S. Attorney General, the
FBI director, or any other official within the Justice Department.”

This is scary. What does this mean, that the government actually has no intention of arresting its most wanted criminal enemies?

Does political correctness and Liberal Fascism/dhimmitude have anything to do with this?

10-Step Guide To Understanding Liberal "Thinking"

Here it is. I believe you'll agree that it's a very accurate assessment of what goes on inside the heads of liberals, whatever there exists within, be it a brain or the end-result matter of the process of digestion (for liberal readers, this means that you have shit for brains).

I'll provide a taste here (I've heard that a small percentage of liberals actually already know what it tastes like):

2. Free Speech Freedom of speech must never be quashed, except for criticism directed at minorities and sensitive constituencies of the Democrat party.

Burning Old Glory is protected free speech, whereas expressions of conservative values by people like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage are unacceptable “hate speech,” which must be subjected to “fairness” censoring and termination by the federal government.

5. Taxes Leveling the playing field between haves and have-nots is the most important function of government, even more critical than national security.

To support that objective, no government role is more essential than levying and collecting taxes, otherwise known as redistribution of wealth.

Tax cuts are wrong when returned to people who actually paid taxes, but are perfectly fine when sent to those who paid none.

Although most liberals deny that Jesus even lived, many use the quote in Matthew 22:21, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s...” to justify higher taxes.

Paying taxes is the “Christian Conservative” thing to do!

Moonbat Spotlight: Warren Kinsella

Above: Dorky old Liberal Fascist Warren Kinsella. He claims that hot-babe conservative, number-one Canadian blogger, Kate McMillan, below, has sent him emails inviting him to, well, have some unspecified sort of naughty fun with her when he visits Saskatchewan. Oh, really?

Nuh-uh. I don't think so. I've communicated with Kate via email and simply cannot imagine her doing as the Prince of Darkness accuses. Knowing Kate, at least from her blogging and from the occasional e-mail exchange re. blogosphere stuff and such, it's my judgement that it'd be highly unlikely for such a thing to happen, certainly with respect to a geeky old moonbat poophead like Kinsella. While not impossible, in my humble opinion, I'd predict Kate would rather roll naked in a big pile of dung than roll in the hay with that washed-up Leftwing geekazoid.

Besides, I once sent her a picture of myself just for the hell of it, just to say, "this is what I look like, eh?" and she didn't send me any "come-hither" emails whatsoever, even though, in my humble opinion, I'm cuter and more shagworthy than Warren. Besides, unlike Warren, I'm respectful of women, which is also in my favor.

In fact, I do believe that both Warren and myself are waaay out of the league of someone like Kate McMillan. I mean, compared to Kate, Warren and I are dweebs (Warren being the bigger dweeb, of course, plus he's a Leftist imbecile and an old fart, unlike me!)

I mean, Kate's not just hot, she's awesome. A master commercial artist. As smart as anyone could be. Most popular blogger in Canada. Biker babe, and a tough-as-nails one at that. Champion breeder of miniature schnauzers who always seem to win whenever entered in doggie-shows. Let me tell you, neither I nor Warren have a hope in heck of impressing a woman like Kate to the point of receiving "come-hither" emails from her.

I think Warren Kinsella's deluded, but, he, being a moonbat, naturally would be...

So... Warren Kinsella, if you're not lying and are not just trying to desperately make yourself look like a studmuffin (which, really, I doubt women would find you to be, save for bimbo moonbat ones and gold-diggers, of course), then...

Prove it. Publish the emails you claim exist.

Otherwise, Warren, you're just a lying Liberal Fascist. Oh, wait... you already are, but you're also a total dweebazoid clown if you cannot produce proof to back up your boasts of studmuffinhood. Putz! Laughingstock!

Obama's Pastor Utters Hateful/Racist Remarks

It's time to take a closer, critical look at the self-aggrandized "Change You Can Trust" agent, Barrack Obama.

Is Obama's pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a racist?


In the November/December 2007 issue of Trumpet, Wright sang the praises of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described whites as "blue-eyed devils" and Jews as "bloodsuckers."

"He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest," Wright said. "Minister Farrakhan will be remembered as one of the 20th and 21st century giants of the African-American religious experience."


"His integrity and honesty have secured him a place in history as one of the nation's most powerful critics," he continued. "His love for Africa and African-American people has made him an unforgettable force, a catalyst for change and a religious leader who is sincere about his faith and his purpose."

"In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01," he wrote on page 7. "White America and the Western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just 'disappeared,' as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring Black concerns."

So, what has Obama got to say about his pastor's racially-charged and supremacist-sounding remarks, including positive allusions to supremacist Islam, raising the specter of lack of separation of mosque and state?

Last week, Obama distanced himself from Farrakhan, but did not distance himself from Wright or disavow his praise for Farrakhan.

Why not distance himself from his pastor's more extreme, disturbing remarks? Leaving that big matzo ball up there, floating around, can only cause him problems in an election campaign.

Also worth reading: Barack Hussein Obama's Contribution to the Clash of Ideologies

Will this be a change for the better or merely and election of ‘hope’ for the unknown and lead to a further Clash of Ideologies?

Sunday, January 27, 2008

The Left's New McCarthyism

Story here. h/t:

(...) we need an honest and profound debate on our country's values.

Unfortunately, that debate is being muzzled by a reverse form of McCarthyism.

That's how it works with McCarthyism. You pick a fight, demonize your opponents and identify them with a nasty enemy in order to shut them up.


anyone who disagrees with their ideas is a warmonger, hates the poor, opposes social justice. Their New McCarthyism is actually McCarthyism in reverse.

Oh, of course, they also call their ideological dissenters "racist, sexist, anti-gay" (and sometimes, add, "...go away").

They declare themselves the "environmentalists," "pacifists," "progressives," "reformists," "democrats," fighting for peace, defending the poor from the rich, the "ethnics" from the "racists" and the planet from everything -- from pandemics to pollution.

We normal folks call them Leftists, liberals, moonbats, Liberal Fascists and so on. That's who these New McCarthyists are.

Screw them! We know our bloody rights and like feck we'll let those (sometimes literally) jackbooted Liberal Fascists take them away!

All together now:

Racist! Sexist! Fascist-Gay! Liberal Fascists go away!

Monkey Proves Smarter Than People

A chimpanzee, one of which is represented at left, has been proven to be smarter than people, one of whom is represented at right (literally, not ideologically) in the person of one "Warren Kinsella" (aka "Prince of Darkness"), who astonishingly, amongst other insane, warped thoughts, thinks that Richard Warman, the guy in the post immediately below this one, is a "human rights" champion.

Warren, who bears a striking resemblance to famous bullshitting sillyman Bill Murray, also thinks that he's some kind of defender of human rights, which is ludicrous. The man's full of shit and the simian at left would easily demonstrate this fact in no time flat. In my humble opinion, any chimpanzee would be a far better proponent of human rights than the silly poophead at above right, in the stupid "death-head" t-shirt, wearing the Mr. Magoo-style hat to hide his expanding bare scalp.

Further, as for Mr. Kinsella, an infamous Liberal Fascist who likes to mock the religious beliefs of Christians, particularly Pentecostals, well, expect me to expose him further in the future. He's so asking for it, that piece of Shit From Hell...

Moonbat Spotlight: Richard Warman, Extreme 'Human Rights' Hypocrite

Richard Warman, bottom left, radically-extreme, militant Liberal Fascist aggressor and robber of human rights from those he hates, and Montgomery Burns, infamously evil money-mad scumbag

Insanity In UK: Woman Prosecuted for Selling Veggies!

Story here.

A woman running a vegetable stand in London's West End is facing fines of up to $130,000 and the possible loss of her business because she was caught by the government selling her produce by the ounce and pound.

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Janet Devers, 63, was notified of the criminal counts with a 67-page letter that arrived in the mail, outlining 13 criminal charges relating to the "improper" pricing of goods as well as the offense of selling vegetables in bowls.

"It's disgusting," she told the newspaper. "We have knifings. We have killings. And they're taking me to court because I'm selling in pounds and ounces."

That, of course, isn't allowed under a European Union-mandated rule that all its nations must use metric measures, so veggies have to be weighed in grams and kilograms.

Oh, for fecksake... I ought to have known... the Liberal Fascist European Union is behind this insanity, this radically extreme moonbattery!

The EU tells Britain what to do. How dare they? Britain ought to leave the EU and tell them to F... right Off! Otherwise, next thing you know, the entire EU will become an Islamofascist Kalifate and PM Gord Brown will submit on behalf of all of the United Kingdom!

Imagine that... treating someone like a mass murderer for simply selling vegetables!

Europe is going insane at a frightening pace!

This raises the specter of the barely-secret plot to implement a North American Union by stealth.

Imagine if that happened. Next thing we know, we'd be prosecuted for turning right on a red light, simply because Mexico thinks that's a horrendous crime. Yes, good old hypocritical Mexico, who cleanses herself of the unemployed, the poor, and apparently even violent criminals by pushing them to illegally enter and stay in the United States. And demanding that the US treat them as citizens.

And who could forget my reporting on the practice of beheading happening in Mexico? That reporting of mine was published on Reuters, as a matter of fact.

And who could forget that Canadians are victims of violence and murder when visiting Mexico?

What the hell kind of a country is Mexico anyway? Just that very question is enough for us to say, "To hell with the idea of a NAU!"

I think it's now clear that uniting nations like that is a dangerous thing to do and would only destroy national sovereignty. I mean, it's like the USSR...

Saturday, January 26, 2008

I, Too, Have A Dream

Story and video here.

Yang Sen is a Falun Gong pracitioner living in the United States and was invited to speak on the aniversary of Martin Luthers death at Martin Luther King's memorial in Atlanta yesterday .. Martin Luther King's wife heard about the Genocide of Falun Gong practtioner's in China before she died.

Interesting that the mainstream media doesn't seem to have mentioned this speech.

It was the infamously Fair and Balanced FOX who covered this speech.

Why, even after the infamous words, "Never Again", doesn't the world seem to care that it's happening again, this time in totalitarian Communist-run China, this time against the peaceful, tolerant, compassionate Falun Gong, who don't hurt anyone, and actually are amongst the kindest folks in the world?

Evil has returned. But the righteous fight that terrible force.

Watch the video for yourself. Bear in mind that the Chinese Communist regime doesn't want you to, as it's inconvenient for the Communists. So all the more reason to watch! Defy the evil Communists with relentless determination!

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Liberal Fascists Complain About Attention Received

Oh, the poor, poor, pitiful moonbat babies!

Some of the latest from Ezra Levant, Freedom Fighter:

My lawyer has received two upset calls from the Alberta Human Rights Commission. The first, from Shirlene McGovern herself, complained about the publicity she is receiving. I'm surprised at her reaction -- you'd think someone who regularly interrogates citizens about their private political views would be comfortable with the
concept of public scrutiny. Imagine if she actually had to expose her private thoughts, not just her public actions as a government officer.

A few days later, another commission officer called my lawyer, complaining about this blog. I told my lawyer to invite them to write a letter to the editor to me. I haven't received it yet, so I presume they're just going to file another human rights complaint against me.

My YouTube videos have crested 400,000 views. A week ago, I installed a statistics program to track the number of visits to this site. It won't surprise you that employees at the human rights commission have been very frequent visitors. At first, as a taxpayer, I was upset that Officer McGovern was surfing the net during business hours, looking for her name. But I realized that every minute she was Googling herself -- ego-surfing, it's called -- was a minute she wasn't interrogating some other poor shmoe.

Oooh... the Almighty Inquisitor Googles herself! On our dime!!! The nerve!!!

Oh, and now for the best, again proving that Ezra has bigger balls than the rest of us, who are relatively timidly tempering our tattling about that big smelly moonbat poopie, Richard Warman:

(...) Richard Warman, the serial human rights complainant and foul-mouthed, anti-Black, misogynist bigot?

Apparently, Ezra Levant isn't afraid of Big Brother. He's an inspiration to us all who want to fight for freedom, but at the same time worry about kwazy moonbats siccing their liars (er, lawyers) upon us for doing so...

All together now: Down with Liberal Fascism!

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

ESPN Anchor Blurts Christianophobic Hate

Dana Jacobson: Cute, but hates Christians

Story here.

Someone call the ACLU! (Oh, wait; the ACLU hates Jesus, too...)

If she had said instead, "F... Mohammed", we KNOW she'd be fired, and potentially worse.

Same goes for her had she said, "F... the gays". Guaranteed she'd never have a job again if she uttered that obviously most horrendous, completely unforgivable of all possible thought crimes!

Don't expect Richard Warman to care, either.

Don't expect much, if anything, to be done to the Christianophobic bigot. It's, after all, politically correct to attack Christ and Christians. The Left will protect this bigot.

A Catholic advocacy group charges the sports TV network ESPN has failed to respond properly to a graphic rant by anchorwoman Dana Jacobson in which she "attacked Jesus Christ."

Jacobson, reportedly intoxicated, was speaking at a celebrity roast in Atlantic City, N.J., when she unleashed a profane tirade, saying, "F--- Notre Dame," "F--- Touchdown Jesus" and finally "F--- Jesus."


"First, there is no evidence that ESPN is taking this matter seriously," he said. "Are we to believe that her hate speech is of no consequence?"

Oh, of course... hate speech directed at Christians is ok as far as the Leftist state apparatus is concerned. They, after all, want to eradicate Christianity. They apparently want to replace it (and the constitution) with Islam and Sharia law.

"It is obvious, then, that neither Jacobson nor ESPN is dealing with this matter in a professional way," Donohue declared. "To put this issue behind them, ESPN must deal with this issue quickly, publicly and fairly, something it has yet to do. After all, most Christians are yet unaware of this event, but once they learn of it, they are sure to demand accountability."

Attacking other identifiable groups, like the GLBT, the Muslims, visible minorities, etc., results in serious consequences, with no possible escape. One's entire life would be a mess forever!

But in this case... whither even the MSM? Christians are offended by this hate speech against them, at least those few who've heard of it. So, where's the equal justice?

What's next, jackbooted minions of the Leftist state appartus are going to go around breaking windows of businesses owned by Christians? Will there be unflattering cartoons of Christians posted all over the place? We gonna have a Christallnacht? It's not unprecedented, after all, for such to happen, and much, much worse.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

FreeDominion Continues Posting Evidence Against Far-Left Aggressor

This guy claims to be a "human rights" hero????
Ooooh! Do read it for yourself.
Human rights hero???

Nuh-uh. I think not.

And as for the so-called Canadian "Human Rights" Commission, for which he used to work and to which he hauls people he doesn't like, well, the label "human rights" is but a cover, a sugarcoating, a deodorizer, for something actually rather foul. Taking rights away means that one is against rights, and the CHRC takes peoples' rights away, after all...

Of course, it only takes rights away from members of some groups but not from others. The CHRC plays favorites, treats people differently, doesn't consider everyone equal, discriminates...

Reminds me of stuff I read in David Kupelian's The Marketing of Evil.

This is also reminiscent of Orwell's 1984.

Remember "Big Brother"?

I think we now know what Orwell meant.
Have we found "Big Brother"?

Billy Nearly Had a Dream

Bill Clinton, left, nearly had a dream of his own while the gentleman at right gave a speech about the man who had the famous dream, Martin Luther King, Jr.
View the video here.

Monday, January 21, 2008

MLK's Niece Battles the Abortion Movement

Dr. Alveda King, niece of civil rights hero Martin Luther King, Jr.

Story here.
ATLANTA - The niece of slain civil rights leader Martin Luther King Junior was among participants at a rally at Georgia's capitol Monday in favor of legislation called the Human Life Amendment.
Alveda King is a pastoral associate with Priests for Life. It's a Catholic pro-life organization dedicated to ending abortion and euthanasia.
King says protecting the unborn is a civil rights issue. She says the proposed amendment, which would establish that human life begins at conception, has non-partisan and multi-ethic support. King says human rights "transcend politics."
Life is a human right. Unfortunately, Leftists tend to closed-mindedly reject this inconvenient truth.
And, it's also an inconvenient truth for the Left that the unborn are human, too. And that the unborn, being human, have the exact same right to life as those who have been born, meaning you and me.

Chinese Use Text Messaging To Promote Quitting Communist Party

Story here.

h/t: Jana

Following the messages written on Chinese currency, text messaging has become the new trend to promote The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party (The Nine Commentaries) and resignations from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its affiliates. It's becoming increasingly popular throughout the whole country.

Recently, quite a number of mainland Chinese informed The Epoch Times that along with their friends and families, they received a lot of text messages around Christmas time about The Nine Commentaries and quitting the CCP. In addition to the text, the messages also contained audio and visual enhancements, which were quite surprising to the receivers. Many resigned from CCP and its affiliated organizations using this approach.

An Internet user from the city of Wuxi received a special message with animation and Christmas songs from overseas. This is what he told The Epoch Times:

"Merry Christmas! So vast are heaven and earth; whither do people go? Lost, the way is obscured; Let truth be the compass. When disaster descends, it favors neither the rich nor poor. But there is a way out—Quickly find what is true! Please press 1 to quit CCP, press 2 to quit CCP's Youth League (CYL), press 3 to quit CCP's Young Pioneer League (CYP)..."

Read the rest...

It's unstoppable. Not even the totalitarian Communist regime, for all its torturous, murderous brutality and intimidation, can stop the collapse of itself via the voluntary termination of membership in the Party by its own members.

The international mainstream media appears to be unaware of what's happening and, I predict, will be extremely surprised when the Communist regime in China falls far, far sooner than they'd ever imagined possible.

But the impossible is always proving itself possible, surprising most.

Pearl Harbor happened. No one saw that coming.

The Soviet Union fell. Whoever saw that coming?

9/11 happened. Almost no one saw that coming.

The list goes on and on and on and will continue to grow.

Make no mistake: The Communist regime of China will collapse.

After all, Communism is, as we well know from history, unsustainable. The Communists' attempt to survive by harnessing market forces and practicing capitalism will only enable the Chinese People to ultimately defeat the Communist Party, as the Party is allowing the tools of its own destruction, which is modern communications technology, to be owned and operated by the People. The unmitigated, selfish greed of the Communists has blinded them as to this reality. They may not even realize that their days in power are numbered.

See also: Quit the CCP Billboard Seen in Streets of Los Angeles

It is just the beginning of 2008. An interesting huge billboard has appeared in the area where the Los Angeles Chinese community gathers. The billboard has the words written in Chinese: "30 million have quit the Chinese Communist party (and its affiliated associations)—people are awakening—Have you quit?"

According to the data from Quit The CCP website, at present, more than 30 million have quit the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its affiliated associations. Ms. Li, from the Global Service Center for Quitting the CCP, said this billboard was displayed to tell the Chinese community in Los Angeles what is happening in China, and to remind those who have yet to quit the party to renounce their membership. Thus this is also a billboard of conscience.

Qu Zheng, an Epoch Times columnist, said the Chinese people are afraid to voice their anger and dissatisfaction under the harsh and autocratic regime of the CCP. The purpose of this billboard is to tell the Chinese people that you have the right to express your thoughts. Qu said, "The purpose of putting up this billboard is to let every Chinese, irregardless of whether they are in or outside of China, know that quitting the CCP is a very common and simple act. It is also a just and honorable deed. Everyone has the same right, although you were deceived into joining the CCP or its affiliated association. Today, one still has the right to quit."

That's right. If you are a member of the Chinese Communist Party, you can leave it. It's your right!

Spread the word.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Former 'Human Rights' Commission Employee and Serial Complainant Appears Caught Writing Racist Hate

Richard Warman, "human rights lawyer", serial "human rights" complainer and former employee of the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission, apparently credibly seems to have been caught writing racist hate.
The "Human Rights" Commission is aware, but does nothing.

Story here.

h/t: SmallDeadAnimals, where there's more, including reaction in comments section.

What a shocker. Richard Warman used to work at the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission.

And he's an infamous serial complainant against people who say derisive things about him online, hauling them before the Commission for offending him and being granted by the Commission thousands of dollars from them.

Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to consider these words to be a problem.

But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse.

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bullshit down our throats. Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place… And that place was NOT in public!

It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.

What does this sound like?

Read on... you really do need to read the rest to absorb what's going on here! Plus there's what appears to be concrete proof that would stand up in a court of law presided over by a scrupulous judge that it was Mr. Warman who wrote that disgusting, hateful drivel.

It appears that this is a scandal of unpredictable magnitude. That we haven't seen anything yet.

Now, whither the mainstream media? Here's a scandal for them. A scandal, for Pete's sake! They love scandals, after all! As for the MSM, I recommend you read this post.

See also: The Third Edge of the Sword,

The Globe and Mail is well aware of a problem with respect to the HRC. But they're not really reporting on it. All they're giving us is a commentary piece by Ezra Levant, who's fighting the HRC.

David Warren Disses Fascist HRC

Article here. It's a good read. This guy's good. Emphasis mine.

That's why you go to an HRC: because your case is not good enough to stand up in a legitimate court of law. And because you don't want to invest your own time and money, but would rather the taxpayer provide officers to do the paperwork, and pick up the tab. Instead, you want a slam-dunk way in which you can victimize someone you don't like, by playing the victim yourself, without any financial or legal consequences, except to him. "Human rights" commissions were designed to provide just this service, for the use of persons who are both litigious, and lazy.


I think those with the means (Maclean's magazine, for instance) should now be applying to proper courts of law in Canada, to obtain injunctions against harassing "human rights" suits, brought with the purpose of abridging freedom of the press. And other media in Canada, whether or not already under attack themselves, should be giving continuous front-page coverage to this issue, in which freedom of the press is itself at stake.

For there is something even more seriously wrong in Canada, than HRCs, when these appalling cases are getting more attention abroad than here at home.

That last paragraph ought to make the little hairs on the back of everyone's neck stand up. I believe that the fact that the mainstream media refuses to cover what's happening with the so-called "human rights" commissions in which peoples' rights are literally violated, is indicative of possible conspiracy between those "human rights" fascist inquisitors and the press.

And that it very, very frightening. What is the press, then, if not a de-facto Department of Propaganda of the de-facto Leftist-controlled state apparatus of which I frequently write? Is the press the de-facto propaganda arm of the Far Left, which we know has infiltrated and acquired a vise-like grip upon the levers of bureaucratic and front-line execution, enabling Leftwing extremists to operate things as they see fit, independently of the actual, elected, legitimate government in Parliament? We have, after all, read the reports of rogue bureaucrats, departments, agencies, etc., arrogantly disobeying the orders of the duly, legitimately elected and accountable Government of Canada. Most recently we heard of the problem with AECL, coldly, uncaringly acting against the urgent, emergency interest of the People and the demands of the Government, forcing Parliament to unanimously pass emergency legislation to restart the Chalk River reactor so that medical isotopes could continue to be produced for most of the world's nuclear-medicine diagnostic testing. That's but one example of how the Leftist state apparatus can effectively run things their own specially-preferred way despite what the laws say, despite what the Constitution Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms explicitly say or, in the case of them brainlessly, doggedly following the rules no matter what, which appears to have been the case with the AECL, despite what the government requests or orders them to do in an emergency situation in which lives are literally at stake.

Oh, and I'm also reminded of judicial activism, which we know to be every bit as wrong as what the so-called "human rights" commissions do with respect to violating peoples' rights. Judicial activism is, of course, a violation of the right to a fair trial and a crime against the Canadian People, depriving them of an unbiased, scrupulous judiciary which they can trust.

Nodes of the state apparatus are clearly marching far too much to their own drummers. They're effectively roguely, mutinously, running a state within a state, ignoring the real, legitimate government and the Canadian People, pushing whatever they please against our wishes.

If Canadians cannot trust the state apparatus, then what?

Now, back to the press...

When peoples' rights are violated, it's usually treated by the press as newsworthy. Like, for example, when militant homosexuals and radical, supremacist Islamists go to the HRCs and allege "discrimination" or "offence" or "hurt feelings", the press covers the kangaroo court cases' results, which are in favor of the complainants 100% of the time. But in the case of Ezra Levant, the MSM is eerily silent.

The press is far too silent. Much like the elusive "moderate Muslims" of the world who we're waiting to hear from a whole lot more than we are now.

Is the press free? Or is it controlled by the Far Left?

Saturday, January 19, 2008

NRO's 'The Corner' On the Ezra Levant Case

Story here. Emphasis mine.

Battleground MSM

The mainstream media is now the key to the battle against Canada’s so-called human rights commissions. Despite the sensation on the blogosphere, the Ezra Levant inquisition is being ignored by big media in Canada, and here. Also, there have been almost no opinion pieces actually defending the actions of Canada’s human rights commissions in the cases of Steyn and Levant. Rather than report a story that exposes the noxious fruits of political correctness, and that could anger Muslims to boot, the liberal media remains silent.

This is a bad sign, but paradoxically also a hopeful one. The media has dropped the ball on this, but their very silence, along with the absence of outright defenses of HRC’s in the matters of Steyn and Levant, indicates that if and when these cases do break fully into public view, Canada’s human rights commissions could be in trouble. When silence is your only defense, you are vulnerable. This televised defense of both Steyn and Levant is a good sign. On the other hand, the huge set of comments below the transcript likely represent just the sort of fracas the Canadian media is hoping to avoid by suppressing this story.

Whither the mainstream media (MSM)?

Is the MSM controlled by radical Islam/terrorists? Does the MSM fear them? Why do they ignore the fact that radical Islamists are literally getting law-abiding Canadian citizens' rights take away?

If the MSM doesn't want the People to perceive it as reliable, fair and balanced; if they want to destroy themselves by proving that they're irrelevant and not worth bothering with, then the People will turn to the non-MSM online media, which is growing very rapidly and will eventually push out the old-style, badly-corrupted source of "information" which is the MSM.

Really... non-MSM types are already working to build a real alternative to the MSM. It will happen, I promise.

It's about market forces. Consumer demand.

When the People come to realize that the MSM is irrelevant, unrealiable, unfair, unbalanced and hopelessly biased... they will turn elsewhere for their news and analysis.

Hey, MSM: The customer is always right.

Minister Kenney Rebuffs Cdn Islamic Congress

It appears that the Canadian government is, indeed, watching closely this situation in which Muslim extremists are abusing an unconstitutional, illegal, Leftofascist node of the state apparatus (nurtured, of course, by Leftofascist Liberal governments of the past, and which are difficult to do something about in the short run) to take away fundamental rights from law-abiding Canadians.

Story here.

h/t: SDA... more there.

OTTAWA - A Conservative cabinet minister says the Canadian Islamic Congress is attempting to undermine basic Charter freedoms by filing complaints against a journalist who wrote a book on the Muslim world.

Jason Kenney, the secretary of state for multiculturalism, weighed in Wednesday on the controversy surrounding columnist Mark Steyn's bestseller America Alone. The Canadian Islamic Congress has filed complaints with federal and provincial human rights commissions based on an excerpt of Steyn's book that appeared in Maclean's Magazine in October.

"To be attacking opinions expressed by a columnist in a major magazine is a pretty bold attack on the basic Canadian value of freedom of the press and freedom of expression," Kenney said in an interview. "I think all Canadians would reject that kind of effort to undermine one of our basic freedoms."

Belarus Jails Publisher Over Mohammed Cartoon

Story here. h/t:

BELARUS (Reuters) - Belarus on Friday jailed for three years an editor of an independent newspaper who reproduced cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad that first appeared in Denmark in 2005 and caused mass demonstrations across the Muslim world.


Belarussian authorities shut down the "Zgoda" (Consensus) paper in March 2006, around the time when other European journals began reprinting the cartoons. The security service, still known by its Soviet-era name, the KGB, began an investigation after Muslims in the ex-Soviet state complained.

Editor Alexander Sdvizhkov was sentenced to three years in jail in a closed session of the court for incitement of religious and national hatred.

"May God and the holy cross be with us," Sdvizhkov said afterwards. His lawyer said she would appeal.

Three years for republishing cartoons. Isn't that a bit extreme?

The Evil Empire lives. Like Hell the Cold War is over. Like Hell!

Word Not Getting Out About Levant's Fight Against Extremist-Fascists

Whenever a certain-special-group member has a complaint, be it real or frivolous, against someone, the mainstream media seems to jump at the opportunity to tell us about it, no matter how small and insignificant, no matter how real or frivolous the complaint. Of course they'll tell us about it; they appear to follow an agenda with a goal to manipulate us into thinking that there's rampant, crisis-level discrimination, persecution, taking-away-of-rights, etc., against these special groups, just by incessantly trumpeting each and every real or perceived or trumped up complaint/charge made by members of such special groups. This is how these groups impose their ideologies upon us; they don't always just want to address a real grievance to ensure basic equality and non-discrimination; there are extremists who claim to represent those special groups and who abuse the courts and illegitimate kangaroo courts with the goal of advancing their specialness, raising it above general, non-special, ordinary, equal humanity, as they want to be superior, to be first-class whereas those who aren't part of their special group are pushed down to second-class or lower status and even end up being persecuted with astonishing irony, falsely in the name of "tolerance" and "non-discrimination" in favor of the special groups. Really, "tolerance" and "non-discrimination" isn't the goal of such extremists/fascists; in fact, intolerance and discrimination against select, non-special, non-favored, non-preferred groups, like Christians, Jews, Falun Gong, Scientologists, conservatives, etc. is what the extreme fascists desire, while they go to sympathetic, corrupt courts, "human rights" bodies, the mainstream media...

But when JudeoChristians and others, particularly conservative-leaning ones, are persecuted, discriminated against, have their rights taken away, even by the state, in violation of their human and constitutional rights, the mainstream media tends to suddenly clam up almost completely and sometimes even attack, subtly, ad-hominem, those who are being persecuted. Such is the case with Ezra Levant's fight against the Alberta so-called "Human Rights" Commission which conservatives have been furiously reporting on and discussing online, with calls for the MSM to tell the Canadian People that this man's rights are being violated by a rogue, extremist-fascist, hijacked-by-the-Far-Left node of the state apparatus which has for decades been crossing the line far beyond its mandate and violating the Constitution Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations.

Even the government doesn't seem to be aware of what's happening!

Al Siebring, who gave me the link to his post via email, discusses the situation at No Apolgogies in the post Quit Preaching to the Choir.

By now pretty much everyone who considers themselves a social conservative, a libertarian, or even just mildly interested in free speech issues has heard of the Ezra Levant case. The YouTube postings of his forceful, relentless, and pugnacious defence of a free press before the Alberta human rights commission have been viewed about 350-thousand times as I write this.

And yet, there's a sense in which the general malaise of chilled "free speech" in Canada - of which the Levant case is just one symptom and the Mark Steyn/MacLean's case is another - is not just not getting through to the masses. Most "average Canadians," it seems, still don't get it. Levant writes about this in one of the latest entries on his blog, and he's right. And this problem isn't just confined to the

There was an email making the rounds in Ottawa this week. It was written by an assistant to a federal Conservative Member of Parliament. I don't know the assistant's name, or which MP he (or she) works for, but it doesn't really matter. The note was sent around to all the other assistants in Conservative MP's offices. It was a simple
request, really:

Good afternoon everyone, I am wondering if someone might be
aware of an issue with the Canadian Human Rights Commission??? I have received a few emails from constituents complaining about the HRC and I
don't know whether this is just a blanket complaint or whether HRC was
recently in the news....?Can anyone help me shed some light on what this
issue might be about???Thanks so much for your help!

I was absolutely stunned when I saw this email. I had always assumed that people who worked for - and advised - MP's would be "up to speed" on issues of national importance, and in my mind there are few things more important in Canada today than the threats the various human rights commissions pose to free speech rights. But the email also illustrates what I've long suspected.

Read on...

Al Siebring is the host of the daily "News You Can Use" broadcast at The father of three grown children, Al has spent the past 30 years as a radio journalist in Canada and the US, winning numerous awards for his work. In addition, he is a proof-reader/editor for Freedom Press. Al makes his home in the wilds of BC's Vancouver Island.

We are underdogs. We are freedom fighters. Those who dismiss us, ridicule us, attack us, prevent us from exercising our rights... hate freedom and hate us, or are at least misinformed, misled, by extreme fascists masquerading as aggrieved persons and groups and by the mainstream media. We will work tirelessly to raise awareness with the Canadian People of these grave, dangerous injustices masquerading as justices so that these injustices are exposed, their perpetrators brought into the public spotlight and stopped for once and for all from perpetuating these hateful, supremacistic injustices against innocent, persecuted identifiable groups and individuals representing them. If we don't fight, we will end up in submission and servitude, denied our guaranteed rights, and such a prospective reality is intolerable.
-The Canadian Sentinel