Saturday, May 12, 2007

Jewish Boy Attacked in Montreal

Caught on camera: The anti-Semitic hate crime.
On the street.
In "tolerant", "cosmopolitan" Montreal.
In Canada.


Story here.

Police say they have "no evidence" that the attack was motivated by hate?! What the feck?

The boy is clearly dressed in traditional Hasidic religious clothing. He is clearly a devout Jew. The attacker knows this for certain! How on earth can the police so automatically caution that it isn't necessarily a hate crime?

If the victim was a flamboyant, earring-studded, skinny, tight-clothing-wearing, gyrating-while-walking homosexual, a bizarre-looking transsexual, a Muslim in traditional Islamic clothing, the left, the gay organizations, the Muslim organizations... would all be demanding that the assailant be thrown in jail for a very, very long time! The MSM wouldn't be downplaying the attack- they'd be trumpeting it at the top and bottom of the hour! There would be destructive riots in the streets! A movie would be made!

All these incessant calls for extra, special, exclusive protections for Muslims and sexual extremists from hate crimes, both real and imagined... Hey, where's the calls for extra protections for Jewish people? Christian people? There are none coming from the left or the MSM. Am I wrong? Show me, then, all of those calls I've been missing, despite the fact that I watch the MSM like a hawk!

You know, had the victim been a sexual extremist or a Muslim, it wouldn't matter what the alleged motive was. The judicial system would automatically treat it as a hate crime just because of who the victim was and the fact that they were attacked. These days the presumption of the motive of "hate" is automatic. Any suggestion by anyone that it's "not necessarily" a hate crime would lead to loud condemnations of the suggester as a hateful monster and so on. And the suggester may in fact end up before the kangaroo-court, fascistic "Human Rights Tribunal" and automatically being ordered to pay a four-figure fine.... just because!

There better not be a double standard here. If there is a double standard and the attacker isn't sentenced for his clearly proven physically violent attack on this visible minority person, according to the sentencing requirements of hate crimes legislation, then there's possibly going to be some kind of serious social trouble. So justice better be done in this case as well as in other cases!

Plus... as the "suspect" is over 18 years of age, his identity cannot be protected.

Who is the attaker? I want to see his face. I want to know his name. I want to know if he's in any way, shape or form, associated/connected with any kind of extremist group of any kind whatsoever.

Dangerous Leftwing Extremism: Latest News from WND

Planned Parenthood Protecting Pedophiles


Excerpts:

Despite widespread condemnation for performing abortions on underage girls while protecting the statutory rapists involved by not reporting them to authorities, Planned Parenthood is continuing the practice big-time – with many new cases of underage girls – according to an investigation of violations of state criminal reporting laws.

In Michigan, activists have discovered two 11-year-olds given abortions by Planned Parenthood and no investigation has been launched; in Ohio, a 16-year-old complained during an abortion at Planned Parenthood her father was assaulting her, but she was returned to his custody and the assaults continued, and in California, a reporter posing as a pregnant 15-year-old is told by Planned Parenthood to lie and say she's 16, activists have told WND.

"Local research has shown that two 11-year-old females have had abortions at this facility, and [the cases] have not been reported [to authorities] as required by [the Michigan Child Protection Law of 1975]," according to a statement released at a news conference in front of a Michigan Planned Parenthood business by Ann Norton of Operation Red Sea and others.



Is "Planned Parenthood" a criminal organization that must be investigated by the FBI, broken up for good and its members brought to justice if found guilty of criminal conduct?

What are the chances that the leftist-controlled justice system will care about this apparent criminality by a radically-extreme leftwing organization apparently deliberately breaking laws?

What are the chances that the Democrats (hellooooo, Nancy Pelosi???) will care?

Will the MSM bother to mention this?

Does the law matter anymore in America?



Bill requires hiring 'gays,' cross-dressers


The Democrats are definitely "hard at work" to reward their ultra-extreme, ultra-radical, militant leftwing supporters.



Excerpts:

Following on the heels of an 'anti-discrimination' plan Christians insist would virtually outlaw their religious beliefs comes another proposal – introduced by openly homosexual U.S. Rep. Barney Frank – that requires businesses to give special privileges to "gay" and "transgendered" individuals.

Shari Rendall, director of legislation and public policy for Concerned Women for America, the nation's largest women's public policy group, said H.R. 2015, the "Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2007," would be a disaster.

"This bill would unfairly extend special privileges based upon an individual's changeable sexual behaviors, rather than focusing on immutable, non-behavior characteristics such as skin color or gender. Its passage would both overtly discriminate against and muzzle people of faith. Former Secretary of State Collin Powell put it well when he said, 'Skin color is a benign, non-behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of human behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument,'" Rendall said.

(...)

"ENDA would essentially force employers to check their First Amendment protected rights to freedom of religion, speech and association at the workplace door. It's absurd! For instance, female employees would have to endure both systematic sexual harassment and a hostile work environment by being forced to share bathroom facilities with male employees who get their jollies from wearing a dress, high heels and lipstick," Barber said.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Chinese Communists Under Fire; Movement for Olympic Boycott Grows

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), already staggering from having over 21 million Chinese leave the Party, is increasingly under fire internationally for its behavior.

The CCP is facing growing international criticism with respect to its hypocrisy in accusing Taiwan of being in violation of the Olympic principle of separation of politics and sport, while the CCP itself is without a doubt guilty of the same, having symbolically treated Taiwan as if it was a part of China in an Olympic Torch relay route, a move that led Taiwan to refuse the Torch.

Nearly a year away from the Olympic Games, in the "harmonious society" proposed by Hu Jintao's regime, the political atmosphere inside China is stifling. The arrests of civil human rights activists, Gao Zhisheng and Chen Guangcheng, the arrests of China
Democracy Party members,
Chen Shuqing and Zhu Yufu, and the arrest of freelance writer Li Hong, all indicate that the CCP has never followed the spirit of the Olympic Charter, a promise it made when competing against other nations to win the bid to host 2008 Olympics.

Recently, the Central Committee of the CCP ordered a cleaning up of China's Internet. (...)

French presidential candidates, Francois Bayrou and Segolene Royal said that a boycott of the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing should be considered if China does not act to stop the genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan.

Mia Farrow, a famous actress, and also the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations, supports a boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Criticizing China's economic assistance to Sudan during the Darfur genocide, she has labeled the Beijing Olympics the "Genocide Olympics".


Huh. Apparently the CCP has created plenty of "goodwill", or what it believes to be such, in its own dogmatic fantasy world.


Seriously complicating the problems for the CCP is the fact that they, along with fellow Communist tyranny regime Russia, have been fingered as having broken a UN arms embargo, which they themselves helped to bring into force, in the genocide in Darfur, supplying the genocidists there with arms with which to carry out continuing mass slaughters.

Chinese strike aircraft and Russian helicopter gunships have been photographed at three airports in Darfur. Their presence violates UN Resolution 1591, which banned Sudan from transferring any weaponry to Darfur without the Security Council's official permission.

(...)

In the same year, Russia sold helicopter gunships worth almost £7 million to the Khartoum regime. Belarus, a close ally of Russia, exported 32 heavy artillery guns and nine armoured fighting vehicles. China also sold six K8 training aircraft to Sudan's air force. Another six of these jet planes, which could be used for ground attack missions, are due to be delivered soon.

(...)

In addition, Sudan's air force routinely employs Antonov 26 transport aircraft - all made in Russia - as heavy bombers. At least one of these planes has been sprayed with white paint and given fake "UN" markings in order to disguise it as a UN aircraft.

Moreover, small arms supplied by Russia and China have been passed on to the notorious "Janjaweed" militia, an armed group raised by Khartoum to combat Darfur's rebels. These gunmen have been turned loose on black African tribes and given carte blanche to loot and murder.


Clearly the Communist regimes of China and Russia fully intend to foment and facilitate conflict all over the globe, promoting mass slaughters of innocents everywhere.


Finally, the CCP's behavior is leading to serious indications of possible official boycotting of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, citing the regime's illegal arms sales to Sudan.

WASHINGTON—More than 100 U.S. lawmakers sent China's leader Hu Jintao a letter Wednesday warning of "disaster" for the 2008 Olympic Games if Beijing fails to do more to stop carnage in Chinese ally Sudan's Darfur region.

(...)

(Tom) Lantos, the only Holocaust survivor ever to serve in the U.S. Congress and a staunch critic of authoritarian states, noted there were calls in some quarters to boycott what some activists have been calling the "Genocide Olympics."

"As Sudan's single largest trading partner, and the main beneficiary of their significant crude oil exports and construction contracts, we urge you to protect your country's image from being irredeemably tarnished, through association with a genocidal regime, for the purposes of economic gains," his letter said.

China's close economic and political ties with Sudan gave Beijing a "special responsibility" to uphold U.N. resolutions calling for peacekeepers in Darfur, it said.

Clearly, the Chinese Communists are not being responsible. They're entirely the opposite of responsible.

Where's the outrage? I don't notice much. Whither the international mainstream media? Do they fear offending the filthy, contemptuous Communist beasts? Why on earth would they? Why would they kiss Satan's ass? Are they evil, too? And where's the left, the international socialists, those pompous, uppity, hysterical folks who claim to be oh, so-much-more-moral-and-righteous-than-thou, who should be making a big deal out of this, but who instead prefer to call the Free World, most particularly America and Israel, two of the freest, most-human-rights-respecting-nations-on-earth, "evil" for actually trying to fight evil! Is the left evil, too, favoring the CCP and Russia over the Free World? Do the MSM and the left approve of genocide?


It's time to unanimously declare Communism to be the single most monstrous enemy of humanity and to proceed to criminalize and destroy that evil ideology.

Eliminate communism in order to eliminate or at least significantly diminish the many, many other evils it deliberately facilitates.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

CN Suing 'Native' Terrorists for Rail Blockage

Bet they didn't see this coming.

Perhaps the homeowners of Caledonia should sue the "Six Nations" terrorists for their continuing occupation and campaign of terror against them. Clearly, the terrorists are hurting innocent people, violating their rights, as well as violating all kinds of laws.

I say make the "Six Nations" pay big time. We're talking millions and millions here!

If the police won't uphold the law, particularly criminal law, when it comes to "Natives", then there's always the civil courts.

Sue 'em! They didn't want to go to court to make their claims on land... yet they're going to court anyway. How ironic, eh?

It's time to act civil. Civil people go to court. They don't occupy other peoples' land just because they think it's actually theirs. Nor do they commit terrorism.

And, lest anyone call me names... remember, this is my opinion, to which I'm entitled. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees me this right to express my opinion. If you disagree, fine. But I, too, am allowed to differ.

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Is This a Moonbat?


Secret Talks Exposed: Olmert To Discuss "Final Deal" With Abbas

Story here.

Today, Israeli political sources told WND secret talks were held with Abbas' aides in advance of a meeting between Olmert and Abbas. According to the sources, Olmert told Abbas' officials he is willing to evacuate large swaths of the West Bank and sign a final deal to create a Palestinian state.

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat confirmed to WND a meeting will be held between Olmert and Abbas in the coming days.

"There will be a meeting. We don't have an exact date but we've been in contact with our Israeli colleagues and hope to hold talks very soon leading to the implementation of the U.S.-backed roadmap, which calls for a Palestinian state," Erekat told WND.


Olmert is out of his mind. Doesn't he understand that this is a suicidal course of action? Does he not see what happened following the pullout from "Gaza"?

What is Olmert's real agenda? Is he even acting in Israel's interests... or is he a willing puppet of enemy outsiders, perhaps the KGB? Why is this man so deliberately incompetent, so incredibly stupid? Why does he do such things which we know are very, very bad for Israel?

There will never be a "final deal" in which there's an Israel and a "Palestine" side by side. Never. That is not the goal of the Islamists, nor of their financers/trainers/facilitators, the Russian Communists/KGB.

Nothing good will come of this.

Olmert must step down immediately!

Poll On Al Gore

Do you believe that the world will end if we don't do whatever Al Gore tells us to do?

YES. Of course! Because that's what we're told!

NO. And Sheryl Crow will still smell like Michael Moore.

NO. Al Gore will just throw another unhinged-moonbat tantrum.

NO. Soon the left will abandon this stupid campaign and start a whole new one to annoy us.

All of the "NO" answers.

pollcode.com free polls


Poll on Judges

Do you trust judges to do their job and stay away from activism in their rulings?
Yes
No
pollcode.com free polls

Environmentalists Increasingly Resembling Nazis, Commies, Islamic Supremacists

Just when you thought they couldn't get any more insane or frightening, they go and one-up themselves yet again, raising visions of Nazi, Communist and Islamic supremacist ideology.


Children bad for environment: Environmentalist


Mankind a virus: Environmentalist-terrorist Paul Watson of Sea Shepherd Society



These nutcases are only getting more and more frightening and less and less possible to take seriously.

They're better left ignored. Like the crazy moonbat extremists in the above articles, plus other, not-so-bluntly-scary-in-language crazy moonbat extremists such as Al Gore, David Suzuki, Sheryl "Miss Poopypanties" Crow, Stephane "I'll Save the World if Elected PM" Dion, the UN's hoaxical IPCC...

One is loathe to anticipate their next extremist, frightening statement... what'll they propose as a solution to environmental problems... Forced abortions? Forced Sterilizations? Mass human slaughters on an unprecedented scale?

After all, world history, past and current, does unfortunately suggest such possibilities!

Perhaps they should no longer be given a voice beyond their own ability to personally pay for its broadcast. Perhaps politicians and the media should stop giving them any legitimacy and air time any longer. After all, if it's reasonable to deny such monsters as Nazis, Communists and Islamofascists a free, mass-promulgated voice for the purpose of condemning humankind, then...

We don't want to hear such anti-human scaremongering!

Besides, they'll only inspire other nutcases to go around killing lots of people at random in the name of environmentalism, or inspire the formation of Stalinist regimes, Khmer Rouge/Pol Pot-style killing fields, etc... so perhaps we should stand up and loudly tell them to shut the feck up!