Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) ALREADY PROBED Sheriff Arpaio's organization following unfounded accusations of "civil rights abuses" and gave them a CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH.
So why is the Obama-Holder Reich incredibly STILL going after Sheriff Arpaio, perhaps America's most scrupulous, most serious, most law-enforcing, most Constitution-respecting law enforcement officer?
So why is the Obama-Holder Reich incredibly STILL going after Sheriff Arpaio, perhaps America's most scrupulous, most serious, most law-enforcing, most Constitution-respecting law enforcement officer?
Back in March of 2009 the DOJ informed sheriff Arpaio that a probe was underway to investigate what the DOJ claimed were “alleged patterns or practices of discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures.” This is where things get sticky for Eric Holder and the Obama Administration.
Six months prior to this investigation the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) had already conducted its own investigation of sheriff Arpaio’s office and not only gave it a clean bill of health, they actually gave a raving review. The report said things like “The OI and DRO supervisors consider the conduct and performance of the MCSO … officers to be professional and meeting the requirement of the MOA.” And that they considered the working relationship between the feds and the sheriff’s office to be “excellent” and that cases brought by the sheriff’s office to be “high quality.”
The DOJ then got caught with its pants down when more government documents were uncovered under the Freedom of Information Act that suggests politics may be at the root of the investigation. Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyers found a March 11, 09 e-mail, that was sent just after the Justice Department investigation was announced, from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency employee to John P. Torres who was at the time the acting assistant secretary of ICE. The email said: “Did you see this?” attaching a news report on the investigation. “Yes,” Torres responded a few minutes later. “Interesting politics at play.”
Need I remind y'all that the folks issuing the unfounded, debunked accusations against Sheriff Arpaio are themselves already shown to be guilty of criminality, lying under oath, breaking the law, violating the Constitution and aggressively trampling Americans' civil rights, especially when the issue of illegal immigration from Mexico is in play? The list is staggering.
Who is the Obamacrat Reich to point fingers and falsely say someone's standing in a vat of shit when they themselves are standing in one?
To wit...
I see a hanging in the future... some people deserve to be hung.
Saddam Hussein was hung. Similarly, Muammar al-Gadhaffi was executed.
In America, the penalty for being found guilty of high treason (Obama, Holder et al) is death.
Justice must be done and be seen to be done.
8 comments:
So:
- you believe the President of the United States should be killed;
- you're now receiving mystical "signs";
- you have portrayed the President of the United States as the Antichrist, as Hitler, as a Demon, as Stalin.
My friend, you might want to be a bit careful about the kind of online profile you're building up.
Oh? Why? Because Big Brother is watching and building a file?
Well, you seem to hint that you might be considering a move to the US; and I'm not sure how happy immigration officials and Homeland Security folks are going to be with an application from a guy who sees signs and declares that the President should be killed.
As for "Big Brother": uh, Sentinel, you DO recall that you have frequently urged everyone to be vigilant and report any sign of suspicious activity to officials immediately?
Wouldn't you say calling for the murder of the President constitutes "suspicious activity"?
People can see your unwarranted hostility, Balb.
It's blatant.
I needn't say further. They can see for themselves, unless they're members of the Cult of Balbulican.
And merely advocating for the Constitution to be obeyed and for treasonous violators thereof to be HELD TO ACCOUNT according to the requirements of the Constitution, ie. with due process, etc... is that a bad thing?
Hmm?
Due process of law under the Constitution is NOT "murder".
What's the matter with you, Balbulican? Enjoy destroying your own credibility?
"Hostility"?
Oh, no, my friend. I don't call for killing of other people. That would be you.
I don't call for citizens to spy on and inform on their neighbours. That would be you.
I don't accuse other bloggers of felonies. That would be you.
I just content myself helping you along the path to the truth. It's a lonely, thankless task, but I will not shirk it.
Asshole: someone who disagrees with Sentinel.
Troll: someone who disagrees with Sentinel.
Communist: someone who disagrees with Sentinel.
I admit there is a certain consistency to your political lexicon, but I fear it lacks nuance. :)
Post a Comment