How is Ron Paul 'Dangerous'?

Here's how.

Got to agree, myself.  After all, I'm one who's studied the global threats environment, both past, present and apparent future, for years.

Why would I abandon my hard-earned understanding just because some guy named Ron Paul claims to have a better understanding, especially without providing valid evidence, valid logic, valid reason?

Bizarre Ron Paul Claim: Israel Created Hamas

Via Breitbart

 "You know, if you look at the history, Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel.”

 -Ron Paul

Ok, I'd like to see EVIDENCE to prove what he claims.  He threw out the claim.  Will he and/or his campers provide PROOF??

After all... it's, as far as I know, a BIZARRE CONSPIRACY THEORY... unless conclusively proven.

If any politician makes claims like this, so bizarre and unbelievable, without evidence, then such a politician will tend to derive support only from fringe elements who'll believe whatever he says.

Ok... got evidence?

Why shouldn't I use the following graphic?  If anyone can prove to my satisfaction that Israel created Hamas, I'll remove it from this post.

BUSTED: Ron Paul Denies Today 'Racist' Writings He Admitted To in 1996

 Ron Paul poses with the founders of Stormfront, Don Black and son Derek Black.

Ron Paul Yanks Mic During CNN Interview After Reporter Presses Newsletter Questions

  “I didn‘t write ’em, I disavow them. that’s it.”

“I never read it, I was aware of it ten years after it was written…

Hmm...

Ok, what're they talking about, and what is Ron Paul denying writing?

the press is focusing on the newsletters that went out under his name in the late 1980s and early 1990s. They were called the Ron Paul's Political Report, Ron Paul's Freedom Report, the Ron Paul Survival Report and the Ron Paul Investment Letter.

There is no doubt that the newsletters contained utterly racist statements.

So today he denies writing them... or even knowing about them...  I see...

Ah... but...

Back in 1996... 

Dr. Paul, who is running in Texas' 14th Congressional District, defended his writings in an interview Tuesday. He said they were being taken out of context.

(...)

 Dr. Paul, who served in Congress in the late 1970s and early 1980s, said Tuesday that he has produced the newsletter since 1985 and distributes it to an estimated 7,000 to 8,000 subscribers. A phone call to the newsletter's toll-free number was answered by his campaign staff.

  (...)

Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be r! ead and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation.

(...)

 He also said the comment about black men in the nation's capital was made while writing about a 1992 study produced by the National Center on Incarceration and Alternatives, a criminal justice think tank based in Virginia.


Citing statistics from the study, Dr. Paul then concluded in his column: `Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

Sorry, but if Ron Paul is nominated, Obama will win a second term.

The Democratic-Media Propaganda Machine will ruthlessly plaster the airwaves with this stuff until Ron Paul's numbers plummet way lower than they forced Herman Cain's numbers to drop with unfounded accusations of "sexual harassment".


Now, who is clean, amongst the GOP nomination hopefuls?

Michele Bachmann.  She has no baggage of the sort that Cain, Paul, Gingrich, Perry, Romney et al have.

In fact...

Bachmann has appeared more eager to be seen as a candidate with broader appeal. She pointed to her record in Minnesota where she had had to win over both independents and Democrat voters to take her seat. She has also gone to great lengths to place herself and her worldview in with the Constitution and the values of America's founders.

Perhaps Bachmann's greatest strength displayed during these televised debates is an ability to keep her opponents on the defensive with an adversarial manner that none of the other candidates seem quite capable of. She effortlessly succeeded in making Ron Paul look ridiculous for the views he holds on Iran and brutally exposed his policies as "dangerous." Paul was left spluttering -- "She took my time!" -- but when he resorted to accusing her of getting her facts wrong, he only succeeded in appearing desperate.

(...)

And if ever Americans decide they do want a president who combines the unwavering determination of Thatcher with the sunny disposition of Reagan and the staunch moral clarity of both, well then they have it in Michele Bachmann. 

Obama-Holder Criminal Organization 'Caught With Pants Down'

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) ALREADY PROBED Sheriff Arpaio's organization following unfounded accusations of "civil rights abuses" and gave them a CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH.

So why is the Obama-Holder Reich incredibly STILL going after Sheriff Arpaio, perhaps America's most scrupulous, most serious, most law-enforcing, most Constitution-respecting law enforcement officer?

Back in March of 2009 the DOJ informed sheriff Arpaio that a probe was underway to investigate what the DOJ claimed were “alleged patterns or practices of discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures.” This is where things get sticky for Eric Holder and the Obama Administration.

Six months prior to this investigation the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) had already conducted its own investigation of sheriff Arpaio’s office and not only gave it a clean bill of health, they actually gave a raving review. The report said things like “The OI and DRO supervisors consider the conduct and performance of the MCSO … officers to be professional and meeting the requirement of the MOA.” And that they considered the working relationship between the feds and the sheriff’s office to be “excellent” and that cases brought by the sheriff’s office to be “high quality.”

The DOJ then got caught with its pants down when more government documents were uncovered under the Freedom of Information Act that suggests politics may be at the root of the investigation. Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyers found a March 11, 09 e-mail, that was sent just after the Justice Department investigation was announced, from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency employee to John P. Torres who was at the time the acting assistant secretary of ICE. The email said: “Did you see this?” attaching a news report on the investigation. “Yes,” Torres responded a few minutes later. “Interesting politics at play.”

Need I remind y'all that the folks issuing the unfounded, debunked accusations against Sheriff Arpaio are themselves already shown to be guilty of criminality, lying under oath, breaking the law, violating the Constitution and aggressively trampling Americans' civil rights, especially when the issue of illegal immigration from Mexico is in play?  The list is staggering.

Who is the Obamacrat Reich to point fingers and falsely say someone's standing in a vat of shit when they themselves are standing in one?

To wit...

I see a hanging in the future... some people deserve to be hung.

Saddam Hussein was hung.  Similarly, Muammar al-Gadhaffi was executed.

In America, the penalty for being found guilty of high treason (Obama, Holder et al) is death.

Justice must be done and be seen to be done.

Lord Provides for Gabriella The Faithful Amidst Darkness of Obama

After months of looking following a kickass job loss in the spring, and after much prayer and patience, my fiance Gabriella Grizzly of US has finally gotten a new, kickassier job!

Soon I shall have to perhaps hyphenate my blog's title...

Sometime after I pass one of these kinds of signs...  After having already received an entirely different kind of "sign" as to what do to now, soon...

 

And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.  Luke 11:9-10

Obama Unconstitutionally Occupying Presidency: Expert

  

He is a criminal usurper, an impostor, a treasonous occupier.

He is NOT the President.  And everything he signed is invalid as a result.

Want to go around saying so?  Go ahead.  By the millions.  Because it's true.

Oh, and Obama ought to sweat, for the penalty for high treason... look it up!

He is guilty of the worst crime ever committed in and against America!

Story here.

"'Natural born citizen' in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning," he said. "Another way of putting it: There is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations."

If you "go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that's precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country..."

"Now what we've learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama's father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn't qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president."

 SPREAD THE WORD!  HELP REMOVE HIM FROM THE WHITE HOUSE ASAP!  DON'T WAIT FOR AN ELECTION, BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE TO! 

Hateful Atheists Demonstrate Intolerance For Christians' First Amendment Rights

Story here.

Might offend someone, eh?  Then can't have it!

Oh, you mean like how this offends a lot of folks?

(Oh, come on, it's not hurting anyone; be tolerant, you hater!)

I say if the atheists get to ban "state-sanctioned" displays of Nativity Scenes, then we must also ban state-sanctioned displays of "sexuality", like the "gay" parades.

Oh, wait... I almost forgot... in the US Constitution, religious freedom and expression of religious belief is guaranteed.  There is absolutely no mention of "sexuality" in the Constitution.  And the myth of "separation of church and state" is just that; a myth (go ahead and find that phrase in the Constitution and show me exactly where it is... good luck, sucker!).

Funny how atheist militants take the part of the Constitution that says that there can't be an establishment of a state religion via legislation... into saying that non-state religions must be "separate" from the state in every conceivable way.

(Christianity is not a "state religion", so feck off, you haters!  We know you're really just Christianophobic haters!  Monsters!)

Well, if this bullshit, not-in-the-Constitution myth is to be followed, then let's be fair.  Let's keep EVERY ideology "separate" from the state, and ban "gay" parades, because allowing them to walk down the street flaunting in ways offensive to many... constitutes an "unconstitutional" establishment of sexuality ideology by the state...

Oh, and if we're gonna keep religion and state separate, then let's certainly put a stop to the "advice" Obama is taking from Muslim Brotherhood advisors who we know are there in the White House!

Seems to me that the "Progressive" movement is always opening one of these...

Hard Left-Wing Propaganda Extremists Take Over NBC News

Story here.

NBC-owned television stations in cities across the nation just teamed up with a nonprofit "journalism" group funded by a billionaire husband-and-wife team who not only spent millions campaigning for President Obama but also topped donor lists to groups such as ACORN and MoveOn.org.

 The nonprofit, ProPublica, will contribute to the news operations of all NBC-owned-and-operated stations, including those in such cities as Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia, the network announced Monday.

 The NBC affiliates will get early access to investigative reports from ProPublica, which describes itself as an "independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest."

 

Also included in the arrangement are local radio stations owned by Comcast, which purchased NBC Universal earlier this year.

And that's only the BEGINNING...

There's, unfortunately, MUCH MORE...

Read on...

Is Obama Resurrecting Nazi Fascist Economics? 

Don’t look now, but Obama again sails into uncharted waters by naming Jefferey Immelt, CEO of General Electric, head of his jobs committee. Imagine, if this was announced by George W, liberals would have screamed like fat kids at diet camp. But the national response is light applause and yawns, proving once again—it’s not what is done, but who does it—that matters to leftists.

Fascinatingly, such collusion between government and big business recalls Nazi fascist economics. Such blurred lines between public and private sectors is the subject of this column.

 

History Lesson:  General Electric Funded Hitler's Rise to Power

The multi-national giant General Electric has an unparalleled role in twentieth-century history. The General Electric Company electrified the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s, and fulfilled for the Soviets Lenin's dictum that "Socialism = electrification."¹ The Swope Plan, created by General Electric's one-time president Gerard Swope, became Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, by a process deplored by one-time President Herbert Hoover and described in Wall Street and FDR.² There was a long-lasting, intimate relationship between Swope and Young of General Electric Company and the Roosevelt family, as there was between General Electric and the Soviet Union. In 1936 Senator James A. Reed of Missouri, an early Roosevelt supporter, became aware of Roosevelt's betrayal of liberal ideas and attacked the Roosevelt New Deal program as a "tyrannical" measure "leading to despotism, [and] sought by its sponsors under the communistic cry of 'Social Justice.'" Senator Reed further charged on the floor of the Senate that Franklin D. Roosevelt was a "hired man for the economic royalists" in Wall Street and that the Roosevelt family "is one of the largest stockholders in the General Electric Company."³

As we probe into behind-the-scenes German inter war history and the story of Hitler and Nazism, we find both Owen D. Young and Gerard Swope of General Electric tied to the rise of Hitlerism and the suppression of German democracy. That General Electric directors are to be found in each of these three distinct historical categories — i.e., the development of the Soviet Union, the creation of Roosevelt's New Deal, and the rise of Hitlerism — suggests how elements of Big Business are keenly interested in the socialization of the world, for their own purposes and objectives, rather than the maintenance of the impartial market place in a free society.⁴ General Electric profited handsomely from Bolshevism, from Roosevelt's New Deal socialism, and, as we shall see below, from national socialism in Hitler's Germany.

(Read the whole thing here)

 

 

 

It's happening AGAIN.

Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it.

Deja vu.

What next?  Seriously.  No bullshit.

It IS happening as we speak...

'Noble' (MSM Thinks So) 'Occupiers' Turn On Obama (Finally!)

Sure took them long enough to protest THE ONE who needs protesting!

Story here.

“Obama is a corporate puppet,” one said. “War crimes must be stopped, no matter who does them,” read another, beside head shots of President George W. Bush and President Obama.

One man, wearing a mask of the president’s face and holding a cigar, carried a sign that read, “I sold out!”

Ben Campbell, 28, one of the march’s organizers, said he hoped to prove to skeptics of the protests that the demonstrators were political critics of equal opportunity.

“President Obama is coming to town solely to raise money from the richest of the rich,” Mr. Campbell said.

It remains to be seen whether this one anti-Obama "Occupy" protest is an isolated incident for public relations purposes, or whether the ordinary, clueless "Occupiers" demonstrate awareness that Obama is... shit, in the rest of the "protests" by "Occupiers".

I suspect this was really an isolated stunt to give the media an excuse to say, look, see, they're not just all brainwashed leftists!

Maybe Obama will now withdraw his endorsement of these "Occupiers" because they're turning on him.  Maybe not.  After all, this one "protest" could very well be a planned, useful propaganda stunt that won't be repeated.  I betcha the "Occupiers" will not blast Obama after this.