Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Cain Accuser Bialek's Credibility: IT'S OVER!


Breaking story here.

Who will believe her now?  It's so convoluted, so... UNBELIEVABLE.

If he did what she accused him of doing, why did she hug him and everything, just one month prior to her bizarre accusation?

16 comments:

∞ ≠ ø said...

Looking at the stature of this beast one cannot help but wonder which type of genitals Mr. Cain is alleged to have been reaching for.

Man hands and all, this cheap bronze hided bottle blond uses money to attract men. Apparently she has run out trying and is using this stunt to re-bait her gnarly hook.

She should be ashamed of herself.

Canuckguy said...

Sentinel:
Where there is smoke, there is usually fire. In the past, you have(as I) swiftly come to assume guilt when the stereotype fits as in alleged honour killings, Muslims who are alleged terrotists, etc. Cain is as guilty looking as them. Having listened and read articles about this harassment issue, I come to the conclusion that he is a liar and guilty. When a crime is committed, I always take a stand(it’s like a game) to deduce 'who dunnit' well before a trial(Casy Anthony is guilty as far as I am concerned as was O.J. and as it looks suspicious for any set of parents whose baby disappears and they are on camera bawling away.) Besides, you know the way to tell when a politician is lying, it’s when their lips move.

balbulican said...

Umm...Sentinel,old buddy?

I know you don't actually READ most of the stuff you link to, but...

That lady hugging and smiling John Cain in the picture, the one so obviously friendly with him (as you point out)...

That's not "accuser Sharon Bialek".

That's Amy Jacobson, the reporter who claims she witnessed Bialek "hugging". Without any other evidence or corroboration, of course.

So we have photographic evidence that your source is buddies with Cain. And that's all.

Sorry, buddy - usually I just visit and giggle, but this was too funny.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Whoopsie. My, what a sharp eye you have, Blabs.

So the woman in the picture isn't Bialek. Funny, but she looks just like her... weird, eh...

Canadian Sentinel said...

Small point, though, it is.

The rest is correct, nevertheless...

And Bialek is neighbors with David Axelrod.

And is broke. As is her fiance.

Who's paying the lawyer Allred? Surely not the accuser. Probably Soros or someone like that. Otherwise, Allred is just in it for unethical reasons, as usual.

balbulican said...

Oh, Soros for sure, through the Cartel.

∞ ≠ ø said...

I would like to share a brief clipping from my Email.

"For a while Balbulican won't expose himself to debate. He will just watch and pounce, watch and pounce when he has found something clever and safe."

Indeed, sooooooo predictable.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Indeed.

Catching me making an innocent, but not fatal, little error.

Then he pounces. Like the proverbial weasel. Oh, right, another error... the weasel goes "pop!", not "pounce". Not that it matters... still a weasel, still doing his thing...

And the accuser is still without credibility, for this and for many other reasons. Of course, the weasel will disagree, just like he disagreed with me even after seeing the evidence that the Hate Boat people were guilty and the Israeli Navy SEALS were innocent victims.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Yes, Blabsy Boy, Aquaman, Shark Jumpin' Jack... you've been psychoanalyzed. :)

balbulican said...

Good. You realize you screwed up. That's progress. Read your source more carefully next time.

Don't thank me - all part of the service.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Hope you scrutinize the accusers for evidence of what they allege, too, and do realize they have nothing to offer but claims.

Dont you agree? ;)

balbulican said...

I agree. At this point, two plaintiffs have made allegations and the accused has issued a denial. Haven't seen much evidence on either side.

About the evil lefty racism, though - I should note that your friend Dodo Can Spell is commenting about "black guys with the hots for blondes".

Canadian Sentinel said...

Got a link to the Dodo thing?

So I can decide whether it's sarcasm, and an accusation against the left/media/political hitmen/propagandists, etc?

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, I see. You chose to interpret that little post in the worst possible way, eh...

But she just linked to something sarcastically that showed another blonde accuser against Cain. So what? Sarcasm isn't racism or anything bad... it just is. People can wonder how come the accusers are blonde, and if they're ALL blonde. Were they chosen by David Axelrod for that reason, for some kind of subtle psychoaffective effect on the Court of Public Opinion?

balbulican said...

Shrug. Draw your own conclusions and forgive bigotry when it comes from your side to your heart's content. It's your soul.

∞ ≠ ø said...

So, Sentinel has a soul. As balbulzibub is an avowed atheist I find this curious indeed. Perhaps we can see the conflicted torment our friend from the dark side is living with. Perhaps, in some very small way, he is admitting to having one too.

Shaming your opponent with emotional deflection may lead you to a Gestalt enlightenment.

It's all part of the service;)