IT'S COOL TO BE RIGHT
The Canadian Sentinel

  • Political & social analysis, commentary & punditry from an ordinary Canadian who simply cannot stay silent while the shee-it hits the fan

  • I love this blog! I find out so much more important and good information that the Media of Mass Deception doesn't cover here in the U.S. -Christine
  • It's great to find a strong Canadian conservative writer cutting through the fog of leftist propaganda that permeates most of Canada's media.

    I consider sites like yours to be my MSM. -Todd S., via email

  • What a surprise and a real conservative treasure trove ~ Good stuff! -Susie

  • Glenn Beck of the North -Jen

  • Your hard work is appreciated, Canadian Sentinel! -Vince in Michigan, via email

  • Welcome to the Canadian edition of Glenn Beck. -Glacierman

    Friday, March 11, 2011

    The One Thousand Dollar Bag

     

    First Lady MIchelle Obama and proof that she's out of touch with ordinary Americans

    Story here.

    If it was Sarah Palin who went around with a thousand-dollar purse that looks like it could be had for a buck at the Dollar Store, the Left and the Old Media would be crucifying her for it.

    But they'll let Mouche-elle get away with it... and with praise.

    Sheesh.

    Governments have been overthrown by citizen protestors for stuff like this.

    Rich, corrupt oppressors who live high on the hog while the citizenry suffer under their tyranny.

    posted by Canadian Sentinel at 3:03 AM

    16 Comments:

    Anonymous Jen said...

    she must have bought a few others for the media-just to keep them quiet.

    Sarah Palin like you said CC, would be plastered all over the media.

    March 11, 2011 10:26 AM  
    Anonymous glacierman said...

    It's not the bag that bothers me, it's the Cheshire cat grin that is accessorizing the bag that really grates the nerves.

    March 11, 2011 11:53 AM  
    Anonymous Enkidu said...

    I think it is rude to refer to the Wookie with the manly biceps and the big caboose as something like a two-bit whore, only more expensive.

    Accurate perhaps, but rude.

    March 11, 2011 11:11 PM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were both candidates for political office, and thus fair game for mockery.

    It used to be that politician's wives were viewed as non-combatants and treated with a little more civility. It's a shame to see that slip.

    March 12, 2011 8:05 AM  
    Anonymous glacierman said...

    Mrs. World traveler with her entourages and spending like she was a billionaire with her own money is not a problem, but she is doing this on the public's borrowed dime. How about all the White House super-parties with all the entertainers from all over the world dropping by for a little caviar and champagne, almost every week of the year? This merely shows the decadence and attitudes of the American Royal Couple. Cake anyone?

    That is the difference here Blab! If we were see a more contrite and humble attitude from our "leaders" then this pointing out of the blatantly obvious wouldn't be the case.

    When was the last time you heard about Laureen Harper's extravagant shopping habits? Barbara Bush?

    March 12, 2011 11:33 AM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    Oh, of course, Glacierman. And references to "manly biceps", "big cabooses", "wookies" and "two bit whores" are just fair political criticism.

    Sickening, really. But hey, if that's how y'all roll...

    March 12, 2011 11:47 AM  
    Anonymous glacierman said...

    I agree with you Blab on those references, probably a KKK troll!

    But the shopping and spending spree that the 1st Royal Couple are on is mind blowing and need to be exposed.

    March 12, 2011 12:37 PM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    I understand that mockery of ostentatious expenditure is great fun, and a cheap way to score points for those who are disinclined to engage in the tiresome chore of actually understanding or debating policy issues.

    I personally didn't care what Sarah Palin spent on her wardrobe during the vice-presidential run, or what Michelle Obama spent on her handbag, or what Stephen Harper spends on his personal stylist, or what Mila Mulroney spent on her shoes. I'm a pretty frugal person myself, and I find the gratuitous display of wealth distasteful wherever it occurs.

    March 12, 2011 2:13 PM  
    Anonymous Enkidu said...

    Balbullwhatever has, of course, never engaged in name calling. Right? KKK, glacierguy? Got any evidence besides your own goofy opinion? Maybe caboose and biceps are particularly KKK epithets or something, I wouldn't know but you seem to.

    Mooshell preaches restraint for others, but spends like she was Imelda Marcos. She has a physique like a pear and preaches fitness to others. She has a rear end that really needs a red flag tied onto it to be legal on the highway and she preaches 'good nutrition' to school kids. Why shouldn't I ridicule her?

    At least she got someone else to dress her this time. It was a relief to my eyes not to have to see her outlandish dresses in garish colours, with that foot-wide best between her belly button and her breasts.

    March 12, 2011 5:59 PM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    What a tasteful and mature group of commenters you're attracting, Sentinel.

    Yes, we on the left have so much to learn from the sophistication of the right-wing bloggers.

    I think my favourite today was Kathy Shaidle's post about how she wasn't going to write about the disaster in Japan because nothing bores her more than "foreigners".

    Right up there with Wendy Sullivan't statement that "Slobodan Mislosovic did excellent work in ridding the world of Muslims. I only wish he’d managed to kill more of them."

    Such compassion.

    Are you going to declare Enikdu's comments about "two bit whores" unacceptable?

    No, of course not. That's only for folks who you disagree with.

    March 12, 2011 7:50 PM  
    Anonymous glacierman said...

    Enkidu. Since when is somebody's physique the substance of such abuse? Your tongue is sharp with criticism, but you are the one short on substance. I do agree that the President and his wife are subject to sharp and cutting analysis, but the personal stuff is uncalled for. Wookie? Nice..not! Genetics can be a hard task-master, we have as yet not seen a perfect human being, so we are all open to the same criticism, what would be said about you?

    All the lingo is typical blogosphere rhetoric about the 1st Lady, but she is still in a position of authority, which makes the personal stuff distasteful. Do you have the CJ's to say it to her face? Really!!! If not, then don't say nothin' at all.

    The substance of her ridicule is in her hypocrisy, for the most part of not leading in a prudent and respectful manner, but from a nose held in the air and talking down to people who elected her husband to the office of president. The royalty attitude is what is particularity grating to those who are paying the bill for her extravagance. Those are character issues and those are blatant.

    March 12, 2011 7:55 PM  
    Anonymous Enkidu said...

    I've been reading your comments for a long time, ballguy. Your outrage rings rather hollow, and is not worthy of further comment.

    March 12, 2011 9:25 PM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    Enikdu: Your retreat is as contemptible and cowardly as your disgusting "opinions".

    Sentinel: How 'bout it, buddy? Does your silence on Enkidoodoo's disgusting comment mean approval? Or does it mean you only censure the folks who disagree with you?

    March 12, 2011 10:42 PM  
    Blogger Balbulican said...

    G-man: kudos for having the balls to call crap when you see it.

    March 12, 2011 10:44 PM  
    Anonymous ∞ ≠ ø said...

    As the dust settles I will suggest, once again, that the point has been missed.

    “…Even as President Obama toasts Chinese President Hu Jintao yesterday, illegal Chinese-made knock-offs are openly sold in Midtown…”
    Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/china_prez_toasts_with_one_hand_2fGQ5dSy0NdWIyIElbBc8J#ixzz1GRhy1eOK

    I propose the Krakoff is a knockoff. Now that's ugly in a whole other fashion.

    March 12, 2011 11:24 PM  
    Anonymous glacierman said...

    Thanks Balb,

    Crap smells the same in every part of the world, and that comment was only good for making mushrooms.

    March 13, 2011 4:26 AM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    MOST RECENT POSTS

    • Texas Rep: If we don't fight, TSA-like security co...
    • The True Face of NPR Executives
    • I've Always Suspected Something Fishy...
    • Isnt This Interesting??
    • What To Do About High Gas/Energy Prices?
    • AXIS OF EVIL; Obama, Wright, Farrakhan... GADHAFI...
    • An Existentialist Look at the Left
    • Allen West, Channeling Reagan (?), Tells Off Islam...
    • Tommy Douglas, Darling of Canadian Left: 'Gayness...
    • Commie NDP Capitulates To Conservatives, Needed Co...

    NEW NEWS MEDIA

    • Bourque News
    • National Newswatch
    • CNS News
    • The Daily Manumitter
    • Canada Free Press
    • One News Now
    • Drudge Report
    • The Epoch Times
    • World Net Daily
    • Debka File
    • Newsmax
    • Fox News
    • Front Page Mag
    • New Media Journal
    • MichNews
    • Breitbart News
    • Canadian News Reader
    • MidEastTruth
    • Blogs

    • All About Terrorism
    • Conservative Reporter
    • Jihad Watch
    • Small Dead Animals
    • Right from the Prairies
    • The Shotgun
    • Ezra Levant
    • A True Chinese Renaissance
    • The Last Amazon
    • The Dry Bones Blog
    • Looking at the Left
    • Random Musings by Kez
    • The Black Sphere
    • Texas Fred's
    • Boston Legal's Ass
    • Bloviating Zeppelin
    • Common Cents Blog
    • Current News Updates
    • Other Links of Potential Interest

    • Ron Watkins Ghostwriting & Book Editing
    • United we stand

      Photobucket

      The Plain Truth About the Middle East

      Archives

      • September 2005
      • October 2005
      • November 2005
      • December 2005
      • January 2006
      • February 2006
      • March 2006
      • April 2006
      • May 2006
      • June 2006
      • July 2006
      • August 2006
      • September 2006
      • October 2006
      • November 2006
      • December 2006
      • January 2007
      • February 2007
      • March 2007
      • April 2007
      • May 2007
      • June 2007
      • July 2007
      • August 2007
      • September 2007
      • October 2007
      • November 2007
      • December 2007
      • January 2008
      • February 2008
      • March 2008
      • April 2008
      • May 2008
      • June 2008
      • July 2008
      • August 2008
      • September 2008
      • October 2008
      • November 2008
      • December 2008
      • January 2009
      • February 2009
      • March 2009
      • April 2009
      • May 2009
      • June 2009
      • July 2009
      • August 2009
      • September 2009
      • October 2009
      • November 2009
      • December 2009
      • January 2010
      • February 2010
      • March 2010
      • April 2010
      • May 2010
      • June 2010
      • July 2010
      • August 2010
      • September 2010
      • October 2010
      • November 2010
      • December 2010
      • January 2011
      • February 2011
      • March 2011
      • April 2011
      • May 2011
      • June 2011
      • July 2011
      • August 2011
      • September 2011
      • October 2011
      • November 2011
      • December 2011
      • January 2012
      • February 2012
      • March 2012
      • April 2012
      • May 2012

      Powered by Blogger


  •