Story here.
This information has been ignored by the MSM as far as I and Democracy Project can see.
Article from: AAP
NICOLE Kidman has made a public stand against terrorism.The actress, joined by 84 other high-profile Hollywood stars, directors, studio bosses and media moguls, has taken out a powerfully-worded full page advertisement in today's Los Angeles Times newspaper.
It specifically targets "terrorist organisations" such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine.
"We the undersigned are pained and devastated by the civilian casualties in Israel and Lebanon caused by terrorist actions initiated by terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah and Hamas," the ad reads.
"If we do not succeed in stopping terrorism around the world, chaos will rule and innocent people will continue to die.
"We need to support democratic societies and stop terrorism at all costs."
The actors listed included: Michael Douglas, Dennis Hopper, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Danny De Vito, Don Johnson, James Woods, Kelly Preston, Patricia Heaton and William Hurt.
Ah, yes... of course, Bruce Willis and Sly Stallone, of course! The guy from Die Hard and the guy who played Rambo... at least these tough guys are consistent! I recommend that whoever sides with the Free World and condemns the Islamofascists, communists and other malevolent enemies of humanity be rewarded via the viewing of the movies they make, etc.
Those who are Dhimmis, however... boycott what they offer. They deserve the consequences of supporting evil!
There are others, of course.
Democracy Project laments:
The question is why I have to get this news from an Australian newspaper, when Nicole Kidman and 84 other Hollywood heavyweights take a strong stand against Hezbollah and Hamas? I just checked google news and there isn’t another story on this out there.
Why has the MSM ignored this? It is significant, for damn sure! Besides, whenever a celebrity or other bigwig asshat screams something anti-Bush, anti-American, anti-Israel, pro-"Palestine", pro-Hez, pro-Hamas, etc., like the Dixie Chicks, the MSM will be all over them. Does the MSM want the population to believe that most people are therefore of such an opinion? It stands to reason that this is the case if one just observes the pattern of reporting of the MSM of such statements.
