Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Gomery: A Very Important Question

This CTV report reminds me of a post I did awhile back demanding something of Justice John H. Gomery for the sake of the appearance of impartiality of the Gomery commission of inquiry into AdScam.

The post in question is here. Read it and the links provided therein. There's much eye-opening stuff the MSM hasn't told us.

Recall I demanded Judge Gomery cancel his appointment of Raymond Garneau on the grounds of Garneau's connections to Paul Martin which, if the MSM were to make a big deal out of it, would certainly cause Gomery to make such a cancellation. Still hasn't happened.

The CTV report is about Gomery's discussion of his appointment of former Mulroney "right-hand man" Bernard Roy to be chief counsel to the sponsorship inquiry. Apparently Gomery has always been aware of the questions surrounding this appointment.

Gomery, according to the CTV report, had misgivings about Roy due to his political connections. He chose to appoint Roy so as to ensure a fair and balanced inquiry, apparently.

Speaking of fair and balanced, how is it fair and balanced to appoint one of the folks who aided Paul Martin in his acquisition of CSL at a time when Martin had no financial ability to do so to head up the advisory body overseeing the recommendation phase of the Inquiry?

There is an apparent conflict of interest here. Gomery must know about Garneau's relationship to Martin. Does he or doesn't he? If he does, why keep Garneau? One must ask the question.

Either way, it's necessary to remove Garneau from this appointment to preserve the credibility and integrity of Gomery's commission, if there is any.

Is the Gomery Inquiry a whitewash of Paul Martin's involvement in AdScam?

Friday, December 23, 2005

Sunday, December 18, 2005

Anarchistic Santa Impersonators

Santarchy!

"No force on earth can stop one hundred Santas!"

What about stopping nine Santas?


Supreme Court of Canada

"The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," -Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin

Who deems what these "unwritten constitutional norms" actually are?

How, in a free and democratic society, can one person or nine people unilaterally declare what is normal?

Why must we necessarily trust these supremely powerful, unelected, unaccountable people? Should we obediently acquiesce to the supreme wisdom of the Prime Minister, the Liberal Party of Canada, the mainstream media, the left, and a certain group of absolutely powerful, unstoppable, Liberal Prime Minister-appointed avowed left-wing social activists?

Do we live in a democracy? Or do we live in a dictatorship?

It's really supposed to be up to the people as to whether they really want their country to be overruled by a system such as there is today.

This is a perfect issue for serious consideration and discussion right now as we're in the midst of a federal election campaign which I personally see as a crossroads of sorts for the future of the Canadian federation itself. What kind of a Canada do you want, if there's going to continue to be a Canada at all?

I see it as a choice between "liberalism" and democracy. As a choice between the Liberal Party's corruption and arrogantly, undemocratically impositive behavior and the freedom of democratic choice of Canadians.

Do tell, what do you think? And why?

H/T: Neale News for the "Santarchy" link.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Martin Claims to Favor Elected Senate?

So Prime Minister Paul Martin claims (in BC, not Ontario, natch) to suddenly see the need for an elected senate?
Sure, and Gilles Duceppe is a federalist, Jack Layton is a capitalist, Stephen Harper is a communist and Arnold Schwarzenegger is a 98-pound girlie man.
Paulie isn't going to fool anyone. He had since 1993 to support an elected senate but didn't. He promised to fix the democratic deficit but made it far worse for the purpose of winning the Liberal leadership and the election.
Could there be a more ridiculous spectacle?
Mon dieu!

Sunday, December 11, 2005

Developing Story: Missile Narrowly Missed Airliner in US in Apparent Terror Attack: Proof Here

From the Northeast Intelligence Network:

Following up on an earlier post here on TCS, I provide proof that a terror attempt on a passenger airliner did indeed occur. A missile was fired at an aircraft and narrowly missed. Read the post for the background and visit the NIN.

The NIN reports (emphasis mine):

Radar images, supplied by T. A. Adams show anomalous event on 26 November 2005 involving AA Flight 612 shortly after takeoff. The Northeast Intelligence Network requested a commercial airline pilot to review the images of the radar activity as it related to AA Flight 612 on 26 November 2005. Earlier today, the pilot, currently flying for a well-known national carrier, confirmed that the event was unusual and "could be consistent with the pilot's observations of a missile or rocket eclipsing and missing Flight 612." He added: "Based on what I reviewed, the unidentified object was not a bottle rocket or flare, but was absolutely consistent with some type of missile possibly aimed at the aircraft."

Here I provide the radar images, with the plane and the "unidentified flying object", the missile, circled in red by myself:
Be sure to click on the link "Radar images" in the quoted paragraph above for a more detailed explanation of the radar images below. I'll put it in simple terms here.

In the first picture below, circled by myself in red, you can see the airliner by itself, far away from any other planes.

In the second picture you see that suddenly there are two "planes", actually one is the first plane and the other cannot possibly be a plane, as you can see from the NIN site data and explanation. The second object is definitely a missile, as analysis confirms. No plane can possibly appear out of nowhere so suddenly, unless it was some sort of stealty fighter with the speed of a missile, which is much faster than any known aircraft. It had to have come from land. The pics below may be too small to read the details, so again, go to the NIN radar images to see the times and altitudes and explanations. The supposed explanation of a "flare or bottle rocket (a kind of fireworks)" cannot be accepted as they're incapable of reaching such high altitudes and of travelling fast enough to be the second flying object.

In the third picture you see the objects overlapping. Obviously far too close for comfort, particularly if it was actually two planes and not a plane and a missile, which fortunately missed.

In the final picture in the series below, we see the second plane pulling away from the first. This is what the pilot saw when he reported it in the first place to air control and was reported on one radio news broadcast and then never again reported by the MSM.




Be certain to follow the original post here on TCS and the reports on NIN for the most complete, up-to-date information you can get. Forget about the MSM. It begs the question why they have absolutely no interest in advising the people of this apparent attempt at terrorism inside of the United States. Isn't it important to remind people of the very real continuing threat from terrorism?

See the actual, full-motion shocking radar data for yourself here! (enter the date and time of the missile incident (November 26, 12:49) and select 20-mile range to view the activity)... from World Net Daily

I viewed the real-time activity for myself and have no doubt that there is definitely proof here of a dangerous situation that cannot be dismissed as another plane (no plane appears suddenly out of nowhere like that; only a missile does!) or as fireworks, which cannot reach such altitudes, let alone at such velocity from land.

Also very, very informative is the following World Net Daily report. Look into it! The MSM has completely dropped and forgotten about the ball when it comes to terrorism. I'm watching for new developments on the NIN, WND and other sources. I recommend them to all. They're listed in my sidebar links list.

Bloggers, let's keep an eye on this story. Let's prove we're relevant and the MSM isn't anymore when it comes to news on terrorism.

Saturday, December 10, 2005

Canada's Military is Out of Gas. Where's Paul Martin?




Canada's military is out of gas...
while the Librano Grinch and
his great buddy Slick Willy
yuk it up for a fawning press...






Based on the CBC report here

Yep, thanks to the incredible stinginess of Librano Grinch Paul Martin towards the brave people who try to make Canada as safe as possible from attack, these brave warriors cannot do much now since they've no money left for fuel to operate their necessary equipment. Astonishing. Where's Paulie? Where are all the Liberals who wish to represent Canadians following the next election? I'm waiting for them to say, "We've immediately given the Military the necessary emergency funds they need." I'm not holding my breath. Even though they had no problem giving more money to the already brobdingnagianly over-budget Long Gun Registry (which hasn't done feck-all to stop gun-caused murders and hasn't taken guns away from criminals, who are increasingly going around shooting innocent people).

Well, I have a message for Paul Martin:

Hey, Paul Martin of the "Liberals":

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Liberal Insider Trading
















Sigh... here we go again. Looks like the Liberals are up to no good yet again, and during an election campaign, to boot. Are they so smugly arrogant as to truly believe they can continue their corrupt ways during an actual campaign and still win the election? Astonishing. Now we see evidence of insider trading stemming from a leak that occured from inside the Liberal government. See also here and here.

Guess what? The Liberals can be found guilty of this and everything else by you and me, the voters, this coming January 23, 2006. They don't have a right, as a political party in an election, to a trial, except in the court of public opinion by the jury of the electorate, which is us, the people whose money they keep taking and taking and wasting and wasting in every imaginable way.

We, the people, have the right to render a guilty verdict against the Libranos at the voting booth. Let's make the right decision: guilty as charged!

Throw the crooks out!

Supreme Bullshit

















Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin defends the current practice of judicial dictatorship (oops, I mean "activism", to be inoffensive to hypersensitive leftists) in Canada. Read it for yourself here. I read what she had to say and couldn't believe the supremely arrogant nerve of the Chief Justice (or should I say "Chief Supreme Overlord and Sole Determinor of Everything"?)

Oh, man. If only I had that kind of absolute power. Imagine the changes I could make to the social fabric and norms and mores of the country. No one, not Parliament, not the people, not even a Liberal prime minister, could ever stop me. I would effect the changes which I personally, dogmatically believe to be in the best interests of everyone. If I was evil I could discriminate against whomever I wished using whatever legal sophistry I could think of and no one would argue against it for fear of being branded an extremist for refusing to brainlessly accept anything and everything declared by me, a far-left partisan political whore in a bad Santa Claus suit.

Incredible. Judge McLachlin declares it's her prerogative to ignore even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the democratically expressed will of Parliament and the people. Incredible and frightening. Just imagine what would happen if she were to suddenly go mad and decide to make evil rulings. How would she be stopped?
The left claims that having elected judges would "politicize" the judiciary. Redundant argument, I say, as, after all, the judiciary is already completely politicized: all judges are appointed by political leaders on the basis of political loyalty and social activist dogmatic convictions. That's the cause of the continuing and worsening rash of bizarre, unconstitutional, irrational rulings made by courts all over the land. When will Canadians see what's right before them and ignore what the MSM tells them the government and the left say about it being correct?
We have, in Canada, a dictatorship by judiciary.

Monday, December 05, 2005

MAN JAILED FOUR DAYS FOR CRITICIZING PAUL MARTIN


Here's proof that the ruling Paul Martin "Liberal" regime is not only corrupt, but fascist and totally disregards the human and Charter rights of Canadians.
Based on the posting from Rabble.ca (yes, that Rabble, believe it or not):
(Emphasis mine):

Yves Engler, a member of Haiti Action Montreal and a frequent contributor to rabble.ca, is being kept in jail over the weekend after he disrupted a speech by the Prime Minister Thursday morning shouting “Paul Martin lies, Haitians die.

Crown prosecutors refused to grant his release when Engler appeared in court Friday, 30 hours after being detained. He will be in court again Monday.
Wow- this by a government that allows child sex-killer Karla Homolka to walk freely among us with zero restrictions on her activities as well as the terrorist Al Qaeda, Bin Laden-associated family the Khadrs.
The current state regime under Paul Martin's "Liberals", the incessant trumpeters of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, human rights and "Canadian values", etc. are totally intolerant of anyone who would say "Paul Martin lies, Haitians die". Contrast this with the fact that Americans are always saying similar and worse about President George Bush and get away with it completely. This is so damning against Paul Martin. It is a smoking gun as to his intolerance of dissent and fascism against freedom of expression. Whose rights will Paul Martin take away next? Mine? Yours?
The report continues with this quotation:
"Yves Engler has been extremely active in trying to make the Liberals accountable for their role in the overthrow of Haiti's elected government and the resulting human rights disaster,” said Barry-Shaw. “He's obviously made some important people very angry.”
Now, will the MSM say anything about this? I bloody well doubt it to hell! No way would the ever-Liberal-partisan MSM ever do anything to embarrass or hurt the electoral prospects of their Liberal overlords! Just watch them remain silent on Paul Martin and his so-called "Liberals" while simultaneously grasping at whatever tiny straws they can find and incessantly poking Stephen Harper and the Conservatives with them, thus manipulating the perceptions of the voters unfairly against them, consequently falsely boosting the public esteem of the fascistic, dangerous, frightening "Liberals" of Paul Martin.
Same thing: the MSM kept its mouth completely shut about Paul Martin's post-tsunami photo op in Sri Lanka wherein he had his RCMP bodyguards physically suppress the freedom of the Canadian press people so they couldn't report on what was happening and tell Canadians the truth about what kind of a man Paul Martin really is. There's also a damning video of the whole bloody thing here at Canada Free Press. See more here and here for more jaw-dropping-shocking evidence of just how far the scary corruption of Paul Martin reaches all over the place without regards to the goodness or evilness of those with whom he and his cronies do business. Terrorists and Saddam Hussein enter the picture there.
And be certain to read Lorrie Goldstein's column criticizing the MSM for not asking questions with regards to why Canadians find Paul Martin scary while always being profuse with the questions and innuendo about Stephen Harper's falsely alleged "scariness".
If you love Canada, vote Paul Martin and his "Liberals" out of office this election. Vote for Stephen Harper's Conservatives. They're very good people.
H/T: Anonalogue for the playing card of Paul Martin

Sunday, December 04, 2005

Missile Fired at Civilian Passenger Jet, Misses; MSM Mute

Once again, the Northeast Intelligence Network reports on a terrorist attempt ignored by the MSM. Read the whole eye-opening report here.

Exerpts (All emphasis mine):

First, here is what happened regarding an American Airlines passenger flight from Los Angeles International airport (LAX) en route to Chicago last week. The pilot radioed the control tower and told them: "a missile had been fired at the aircraft and missed." The aircraft, according to our investigation, was engaged in a "climb and turn" maneuver, following departure from LAX, over Santa Monica Bay, at an altitude of
5,000 feet and climbing when the pilot reported seeing a smoke trail pass near the cockpit. The aircraft was south of the airport, and over water in the vicinity of Redondo Beach.
Next, many are asking what happened to the media reports pertaining to this incident. The story was carried by a syndicated radio news network early Monday morning and was heard by many people, but the story seemed to "vanish" after it was initially reported. Some in the syndicated media, contacted by this agency, stated that this incident was a "non-story" and subsequently left it to die - as, according to the FBI: they believed the pilot most likely saw a "flare or bottle rocket." This explanation neglects the fact that neither explanation would be plausible, especially since a trained pilot would be adept at identifying the smoke plume created by a flare, and the "bottle rocket" firecracker explanation at that altitude is simply ludicrous.

The article also has some excellent analysis and perspective-giving commentary.

Listen, folks, it is perfectly clear from the evidence at this time that there has been an apparent attempt to destroy a passenger aircraft with a missile and the MSM does not care. Why not? Isn't there enough demand from the average news consumer for information of terrorist threats and actual attempts? Why is it that we hear about terrorism only after people are actually murdered by the terrorist acts? Why isn't it considered important to be aware of attempts that fail?

I, for one, am appalled at the cavalier ignorance on the part of the MSM regarding something far, far more important than the usual dingbatty fluff stories about what Paris Hilton or Jennifer Aniston or Britney Spears did the other day, often with a tiny canine companion, regardless of the cuteness of said ladies.

This story recalls the disturbing incident at Tinker AFB that happened a few months ago. Read it and ask yourself why didn't the MSM say anything about it, particularly in light of the more recent actual attempt at terrorism perhaps stemming from the Tinker AFB 'dry run' by apparent terrorists.And, by the way, Canadians must really be asking more and more what, exactly has Paul Martin's Liberal government actually done besides toss around a claimed $8 billion "for security" and spew rhetoric about so-and-so working closely with so-and-so and so on? The military is continuing to fall apart at the seams due to Liberal stinginess despite skyrocketing surpluses due to overtaxation. The RCMP is grossly underfunded and underresourced to the point that they really cannot do their job anymore, other than try to do something with their steadily growing backlogs of work. Border stations have closed down. The CSIS needs more funding in order to do more, but that's not happening. The government claims there is no threat to the Montreal rail system despite evidence to the contrary. Seems like the Liberals and the left in general are of the "don't worry, be happy" attitude, doesn't it? Fact is, we are without a doubt everywhere in the world in danger from terrorist attack. And the Canadian Liberal government of Paul Martin gives not a shrew's butt. Rather, they chose instead to make multibilliondollar election promises just as they did in 2004. All just to keep themselves in power and enriching themselves and their friends while the country and its people continue to suffer from a declining standard of living and live under the imminent threat of terrorism.But at least we have an election campaign now underway.
And as soon as January 23, 2006 we'll get the beautiful opportunity to terminate the Liberals and install the Conservatives to do the job of governing the country the Liberals simply won't do.
Let's roll!

Martin Scary, Harper Moderate: Crosbie

Former federal cabinet minister John Crosbie explains in a column in the Toronto Sun why he finds Prime Minister Paul Martin to be scary. Read it for yourself here.

For 200 more true reasons to fear the "Liberals" of Paul Martin, the Dithering Don, go here.

Need I say more? I could.

H/T: Neale News

The Only Reason to Vote "Liberal"?


Scary!

Many, Many Reasons to Terminate the Liberals

Thanks to an email tip from Tony Guitar, I am able to present everyone with many, many reasons to realize just how incredibly terrible the so-called "Liberal" government of Paul Martin really is and to vote against their continuance in power as the greedy dictators of the Canadian federation. Please understand that a single vote for the "Liberals" would be tantamount to a declaration that "crime pays for Liberals". It is important to the survival of Canada that the Liberal Party of Canada be sent a devastating message that their unacceptable behavior and cavalier attitude will no longer be tolerated and that they be sent into the proverbial political wilderness indefinitely while the Conservatives take their place and implement policies which will reverse the damages caused by the Liberals and facilitate Canada's rejuvenation and remove the shackles on its economic and social potential which the Liberals applied in their attempt to exploit the country with a view to their self-enrichment.
Here we go: Click here.

Friday, December 02, 2005

Martin's Chief AdScam Spin Doctor Now Ambassador to Costa Rica

Good Lord... Adscam just keeps on going... now we have new information certain to keep the issue alive and biting Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberals.
Based on the explosive Canada Free Press article:
The setting: Costa Rica.
Who:
Jean Lafleur, prominent Adscam figure. His communications firm over four years took in $15 million of our tax dollars. Read the article for the infuriating details on this flamboyant, reportedly very annoying-to-his-neighbors fellow living the high, loud life with his boyfriend "Larry".
Mario Laguë, Prime Minister Paul Martin’s former director of communications. Now Ambassador to Costa Rica.
(All emphasis mine)
That’s the same Laguë who was the senior bureaucrat in overall charge of Ottawa’s communications strategy, and the same one who reported directly to the same Cabinet communications committee, headed by then public works minister Alfonso Gagliano. Readers may recall that the disgraced Gagliano is the figure indirectly responsible for giving the Liberals their "Libranos" label.
Laguë, who served as Martin’s communication director from December 2003 to July 2004, presented Adscam in the best possible light after Auditor General Sheila Fraser discovered and revealed it. Canadian media dubbed him as "Martin’s spin
doctor
".
Here we go again. Just add this to everything else we know about the whole scandal and the players. Looks like it's going to go on for awhile before all the facts are out about who did what and so on...
Lague reportedly has only attended one official public function since his Appointment was announced by Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew on 16 September 2004. Looks like we're continuing to get excellent value for our money in this fellow, doesn't it?
What'll we learn next as the sordid affair continues to unravel and follow Paul Martin all over the campaign trail?

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Another Librano Lawnsign


Ouch!

The Liberals and the MSM Again: Way Too Close?

Very busy again, but this I must direct your attention towards. It casts more doubt as to the impartiality of the MSM and its apparently far-too-close relationship with the still-ruling Liberal Party of Canada. Follow the story via SmallDeadAnimals.
The evidence keeps on mounting day after day. Once again we see more evidence of MSM bias in favor of the Liberals, this time with regards to Bell Globemedia.
And once again the Earnscliffe name arises. Previously I've mentioned this name as one that Judge Gomery was blocked from looking into as it might prove some connection between Prime Minister Paul Martin and Adscam.
The significance of all this is that one must necessarily doubt the reporting of the MSM, particularly of Bell Globemedia's CTV news and the Globe and Mail. The connection of such a powerful individual from Bell Globemedia so intimately to the Liberal Party is indeed a conflict of interest to the reasonable person's mind. As for the CBC, is there any doubt as to Liberal/PMO influence therewithin? The crown corporation, after all, depends on the Liberal government for its funding. And there's Canwest Global, owned and controlled by the Liberal-loyalist Aspers. No reasonable person today will believe in the independence of the MSM after considering all this.
So whenever the MSM "reports" positively on the Liberals and negatively on the Conservatives and other parties, one must necessarily take it with a scrutinizing grain of salt, separating objective fact reporting from anything looking suspiciously like bias or unfairness on the part of the MSM, who apparently have an interest in the continuance of the Liberal regime, regardless of the dangers to the country posed by such continuance of such a massively corrupt government.
Troubling, I find it all.
Update:
See also the excellent post by Young Conservative on MSM bias.