tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post447151767213878616..comments2024-01-24T04:35:14.007-04:00Comments on The Canadian Sentinel: Obama Blacklists Critical Media Members From DinnerCanadian Sentinelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-30276387248301350242010-05-03T10:38:16.156-03:002010-05-03T10:38:16.156-03:00Ahhh. Balbulican does not understand the concept ...Ahhh. Balbulican does not understand the concept of metapatterns. Add Gregory Bateson to your, what must by now be a lengthy, reading list. Mind and Nature should do.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-7418396392248426862010-05-02T12:03:18.678-03:002010-05-02T12:03:18.678-03:00"So exactly whom do you believe who was invit..."So exactly whom do you believe who was invited and allowed to be there... actually practices "journalism", as opposed to being a propaganda mouthpiece/attack dog for the Obamacrat Reich?"<br /><br />Well, Fox, for starters. <br /><br />"As for when they carried stories that turned out to be wrong, well, which Big Media outlet has never, ever done that? Which Big Media outlet is scrupulously just-the-proven-facts-and-nothing-but? Which Big Media outlet never carries fluffy stories and never runs strange advertisements?"<br /><br />None have never done the above. Unfortunately, WND is not a news outlet. It provides NO balance, makes NO distinction between editorial and "journalistic" coverage, and it's frankly not taken seriously by serious writer of ANY political stripe. It's a useful source for people who fill up ideological blogs and don't care about honesty or accuracy, and that's all. Sorry, dude: but just about every time I've gone to your source and checked back a story, I discover that it's based on significant omissions of fact. <br /><br />"Why don't you admit that nobody out there is always perfect, and quit attacking only those who say inconvenient stuff about your Holy Messiah Bammaramma"<br /><br />Smile. Why don't you stop saying such stupid things...or at least find one place, every, anywhere, where I've claimed "anybody out there is always perfect", or whatever? Good grief, Scenty, you're talking like my four year old niece. <br /><br />"And whatever happened to your commitment to free speech, and your staunch opposition to censorship?"<br /><br />It more sincere than yours, since I don't censor, edit or block comments, as you have done. And I'm not sure what you're talking about: I think WND should be allowed to write about anything they want, and shouldn't be censored. But this is a function for journalists, not propagandists who write crazy shit about Obama being the Antichrist. Sorry, dude, that's not journalism. <br /><br />As for the rest - you know, your habit of lumping every single one of your disconnected, stream of consciousness gripes with the universe together in every post is one of the things that make people laugh at you.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-32032619352487633912010-05-02T10:27:41.862-03:002010-05-02T10:27:41.862-03:00Apparently it's ok, as far as Balbulican is co...Apparently it's ok, as far as Balbulican is concerned, for the Obamacrat Reich to blacklist and censor and stuff, but not ok for conservative bloggers like me.<br /><br />Gotcha.<br /><br />And I wish you'd agree that Obama's promise to be "open and transparent" is nothing but a big fat lie, 'cause he's been anything but, and is even more closed and opaque than Bush ever was. And getting worse.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-34989217054209394722010-05-02T10:25:17.978-03:002010-05-02T10:25:17.978-03:00And whatever happened to your commitment to free s...And whatever happened to your commitment to free speech, and your staunch opposition to censorship?<br /><br />You obviously agree with the Obamacrat Reich blacklisting inconvenient newsmedia outlets.<br /><br />Oooooops! Balbulican's fake mustache slipped and is now oddly crooked and fooling no one!Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-46534257854168762152010-05-02T10:20:02.697-03:002010-05-02T10:20:02.697-03:00They were blacklisted for being especially critica...They were blacklisted for being especially critical and for reporting the most inconvenient facts which no one else would report. As for when they carried stories that turned out to be wrong, well, which Big Media outlet has never, ever done that? Hmm? Which Big Media outlet is scrupulously just-the-proven-facts-and-nothing-but? Which Big Media outlet never carries fluffy stories and never runs strange advertisements?<br /><br />Double standard. That's what you practice. Why don't you admit that nobody out there is always perfect, and quit attacking only those who say inconvenient stuff about your Holy Messiah Bammaramma?Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-84088259183248847802010-05-02T10:14:31.075-03:002010-05-02T10:14:31.075-03:00So exactly whom do you believe who was invited and...So exactly whom do you believe who was invited and allowed to be there... actually practices "journalism", as opposed to being a propaganda mouthpiece/attack dog for the Obamacrat Reich?Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-28107547079309919522010-05-02T08:12:44.572-03:002010-05-02T08:12:44.572-03:00I think it's because WND doesn't practice ...I think it's because WND doesn't practice "journalism", Scenty. Like yourself, they're propagandists. I know you don't understand the difference between the two.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.com