tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post2895148192821461228..comments2024-01-24T04:35:14.007-04:00Comments on The Canadian Sentinel: Persecuted In Canada: Black Christian Street Preacher Rev. David LynnCanadian Sentinelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-72786460006064130202015-02-28T10:22:51.265-04:002015-02-28T10:22:51.265-04:00Those aren't "opinions", Sentinel. ...Those aren't "opinions", Sentinel. Those are statements of fact, observable, without interpretation, elicited from the video clip YOU posted.<br /><br />Regarding your question on Aboriginal adherence to the law, I repeat my invitation: was there a specific incident you wanted my opinion about?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-47344304590758892202015-02-28T03:25:53.069-04:002015-02-28T03:25:53.069-04:00Ok, that's your opinion. Next!Ok, that's your opinion. Next!Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-40299580574732048022015-02-26T16:14:50.283-04:002015-02-26T16:14:50.283-04:00No problem. So, to sum up:
Lynn was violating a ...No problem. So, to sum up: <br /><br />Lynn was violating a bylaw, using an amplifier at a street event, without a permit. <br /><br />He was asked to unplug his amp, and refused. <br /><br />He was told that he could continue if he unplugged. He refused. <br /><br />So based on the evidence you yourself selected and presented, the guy broke the law, was offered a the opportunity to comply, and refused. <br /><br />LOL. Hard to read that as "persecution". But of course, as you say, we'll find out more when it comes to trial. <br /><br />Regarding your question on Aboriginal adherence to the law, I repeat my invitation: was there a specific incident you wanted my opinion about?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-48157663750931372802015-02-26T15:53:20.086-04:002015-02-26T15:53:20.086-04:00Oh, forgot to mention... just because someone make...Oh, forgot to mention... just because someone makes pretty assertive/aggressive demands for further comment from myself... doesn't mean I'm necessarily going to bother to respond. I shall let others look at what I presented and what commentors presented and decide for themselves. It is what it is. Persecution against Christians is a reality. Persecution against GLBTs isn't so much, in Canada and the USA, to name two nations. In fact, the GLBTs in these two nations are one of society's most powerful groups... they don't need any more help or sympathy or new laws to bash, via state apparatus proxy, those who disagree with their philosophies, etc. They're powerful and can stand on their own. As for Muslims, they're even more powerful and the GLBTs leave them alone for either reason of fear for life or because they have marching orders to remain silent no matter what the Muslims say and/or do to GLBTs or re. GLBTs.<br /><br />Christians and Jews are the most persecuted groups in the Free World and in the Muslim World and elsewhere. This is the fact. Go ahead, deny, fine. And be a denier of the apparent reality and a follower of the propaganda narrative of the Far Left. Whatever. It is what it is. The reality is what it is. I don't expect "progressives" to accept reality as it is because they will NOT. They will make believe what they're told to make believe because they don't have minds of their own. And are arrogantly proud of it. Disgusting character content, morality, ethics abound amongst the "progressives'" collectivity.<br /><br />Ok, got to go.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-13548824963699112702015-02-26T07:58:56.914-04:002015-02-26T07:58:56.914-04:00My comments were based on the facts that YOU selec...My comments were based on the facts that YOU selected and chose to present, Mr. Sentinel. <br /><br />If there are additional facts that you're withholding, then publish them, and my opinion may change. <br /><br />However, since you're not actually questioning the fairly straightforward facts I cited as the material cause of the charge, I don't think there's any basis for your suspicion. <br /><br />Regarding your question on Aboriginal adherence to the law, I repeat my invitation: was there a specific incident you wanted my opinion about?<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-86070186924967998362015-02-26T05:33:27.815-04:002015-02-26T05:33:27.815-04:00I'm afraid you don't know all the facts, M...I'm afraid you don't know all the facts, MR. Rudden. Let's wait til they all come out properly in court. I've a feeling there's more to it than you want to believe. I know you "progressives" are deniers wrt the persecution of Christians.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-33121146704690624922015-02-25T23:44:18.949-04:002015-02-25T23:44:18.949-04:00As for your question about Aboriginal people and t...As for your question about Aboriginal people and the law, I believe that all Canadians should abide by the rule of law. Did you have a question about a specific incident you wanted to ask?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-16028900306921546782015-02-25T23:42:33.868-04:002015-02-25T23:42:33.868-04:00To respond to your first string of questions: real...To respond to your first string of questions: really, it's quite simple. <br /><br />A permit is required for use of amplification at street events.<br /><br />That the gentleman in question didn't have one. <br /><br />The policeman told him he could continue if he unplugged his amp. <br /><br />Which of those points is incorrect? Because if they are correct (and given the video you posted, they SEEM to be correct), then all that has happened here is that a man has violated a bylaw. He DID violate the bylaw: you understand that, don't you? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-29677799661987802552015-02-25T18:41:16.577-04:002015-02-25T18:41:16.577-04:00And to believe in law and order, I'd ask, Mr. ...And to believe in law and order, I'd ask, Mr. Rudden, do you believe that Aboriginals should be treated any more leniently by police and courts than are non-Aboriginals? Suppose a bunch of white folks blocked a road or bridge with burning tires. Wouldn't they all be arrested quickly? How come Aboriginals are allowed to do such things, but non-Aboriginals aren't? Something tells me that when "progressive" ideologues/activists say they "believe in law and order", they're just saying that as a matter of momentary propagandic convenince. I see that all the time on the "progressive" side.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-8094790488093758322015-02-25T18:38:22.242-04:002015-02-25T18:38:22.242-04:00Also, if a permit is required for all, where is th...Also, if a permit is required for all, where is the evidence in such a case that police swooped down on everyone aggressively and demanded to see THEIR permits? <br /><br />Seems someone is assuming something... an interesting attempt to frame the matter to their advantage.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-90953202230542989262015-02-25T18:36:22.947-04:002015-02-25T18:36:22.947-04:00Seems that some would assume that just because a C...Seems that some would assume that just because a Christian was told he "needed a permit" to exercise his Charter rights, that everyone else required a permit. Does anyone have evidence that everyone else had a permit to do what they were doing?<br /><br />That said, why do we need a permit to do that which is a guaranteed right?Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-89259826565080600352015-02-25T18:31:47.879-04:002015-02-25T18:31:47.879-04:00Just wanted to add that "progressives" w...Just wanted to add that "progressives" will go out of their way to take the side of those who hate Christians.Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-38180312235572321952015-02-21T16:11:27.690-04:002015-02-21T16:11:27.690-04:00Well, the folks who hate gays and Muslims will try...Well, the folks who hate gays and Muslims will try to make a martyr of this poor fellow. I myself believe in the rule of law. I guess we'll learn what the courts say. <br /><br />You note that "he was stopped, silenced and charged with an offence, unlike the nearby MUSLIM street preachers, who are left alone by police. Loud, showy breakdancers and other public performers were left alone by police as well."<br /><br />The charge, from the Levant interview, appears to have been using amplification without a permit. The policeman makes it quite clear that he will be free to continue if he stops using the amplifier. <br /><br />Are you suggesting that the other performers to whom you refer ALSO did not have permits? Do you have some evidence of that? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-1692531027651971242015-02-21T10:07:55.189-04:002015-02-21T10:07:55.189-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998365158003931436noreply@blogger.com