tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post1959375866117737758..comments2024-01-24T04:35:14.007-04:00Comments on The Canadian Sentinel: AXIS OF EVIL; Obama, Wright, Farrakhan... GADHAFICanadian Sentinelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-48524761370891292652011-03-03T22:12:06.093-04:002011-03-03T22:12:06.093-04:00I was indeed asking about you, G. You have brought...I was indeed asking about you, G. You have brought a very civilizing influence to our neighborhood, and you are missed. Glad to hear all is well.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-58524357204384570222011-03-03T18:13:11.896-04:002011-03-03T18:13:11.896-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ms.FreeJusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07769157343127848847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-4338826778633347262011-03-03T16:35:34.343-04:002011-03-03T16:35:34.343-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ms.FreeJusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07769157343127848847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-48512224216607464082011-03-03T16:35:33.457-04:002011-03-03T16:35:33.457-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ms.FreeJusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07769157343127848847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-61034199253184183342011-03-03T16:35:32.558-04:002011-03-03T16:35:32.558-04:00Balbulican,
If you were asking about me in one of ...Balbulican,<br />If you were asking about me in one of your previous messages, I too am right in the middle of something huge! Im sorry I havent been on, but have no fear,I will be back soon. In the meantime, Im enjoying all the blogging going on with everyone :) Thanks for caring Balbulican.Ms.FreeJusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07769157343127848847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-24582397855604237412011-03-02T23:17:24.194-04:002011-03-02T23:17:24.194-04:00"I posted a conclusion based on incomplete re..."I posted a conclusion based on incomplete research."<br /><br />My dear boy, you have more ways of saying "I just made it up" than Carter has Liver Pills. It's immensely diverting. Treat us to another. Or explain gongs to me again. That was fun too.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-20784546556627598862011-03-02T23:06:48.565-04:002011-03-02T23:06:48.565-04:00No, I posted a conclusion based on incomplete rese...No, I posted a conclusion based on incomplete research. I hastened the post and erred in detail. You are still disproved, and picking at this detail will not save you. You leaped to the support of an unknown commenter, while doing no fact checking, and obnoxiously attempted to gain a point by point capitulation by C.S.<br />You stand refuted on each of those points.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-61885849299181280412011-03-02T18:21:31.114-04:002011-03-02T18:21:31.114-04:00Aha! Still alive and well.Aha! Still alive and well.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-21905111040560360542011-03-02T18:17:23.531-04:002011-03-02T18:17:23.531-04:00It’s a small adjustment. You see given the invali...It’s a small adjustment. You see given the invalidation of passports, Tripoli Lebanon and the Muslim Brotherhood as host seemed a logical conclusion. This far back, one can truly see the advantages of print material and a decent periodical index. As stated I am now convinced they went to Libya. So there was no third party host, I should have removed that upon resolving the Tripoli vs. Tripoli problem. There's not much primary source evidence as the trip was illegal, a violation of U.S. policy, and therefore clandestine.<br /><br />You are still refuted of course.<br /><br />Wishing our host well, and hoping there's no need to.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-6928995640864194052011-03-02T18:06:51.726-04:002011-03-02T18:06:51.726-04:00So dude - where are your co-bloggers??So dude - where are your co-bloggers??Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-63519968328458037682011-03-02T17:46:42.066-04:002011-03-02T17:46:42.066-04:00Sorry I didn't pay attention, guys- got far mo...Sorry I didn't pay attention, guys- got far more important stuff happening for a while now, hence the light blogging...<br /><br />But rest assured: I'll be back.<br /><br />And big-time. Working on it... When "big-time" happens, I don't know yet, but it WILL. The exact nature of "big-time", TBD later. ;)Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-76667500797168741102011-03-01T08:16:25.322-04:002011-03-01T08:16:25.322-04:00I'm sorry, perhaps you misunderstood my reques...I'm sorry, perhaps you misunderstood my request. <br /><br />Not one of your links mentions a meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood. Is this one of those things that you just KNOW must have happened? :) <br /><br />I ask because, of course, Gadaffi despised the Muslim Brotherhood; banned it shortly after coming to power; and exiled, jailed or tortured many of its supporters. So your surprising revelation is going to require a major rewrite of Middle Eastern modern history. Unless, of course, you're just making stuff up.<br /><br />Please provide your evidence: I am all ears.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-48030644013711896082011-02-28T23:30:09.030-04:002011-02-28T23:30:09.030-04:00My computer is absolutely FUBARed !!! Somehow I ha...My computer is absolutely FUBARed !!! Somehow I have Chinese characters all over the place. Hmmmmm. If this is a repost, sorry. The first one seems to have gone down in the crash this afternoon.<br />Enjoy! <br />It may be a while before I am back. <br /><br />http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,926646,00.html<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Farrakhan<br />(under ‘gutter’ religion)<br /><br />http://www.blacksandjews.com/Min._Farrakhan_%26_the_Jews.html<br />(same type reference, more hate speech)<br /><br />In August 1981, two Libyan jets fired on U.S. aircraft participating in a routine naval exercise over international waters of the Mediterranean claimed by Libya. The U.S. planes returned fire and shot down the attacking Libyan aircraft. In December 1981, the State Department invalidated U.S. passports for travel to Libya and, for purposes of safety, advised all U.S. citizens in Libya to leave.<br />http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5425.htm<br /><br />Oh, of course the original source of Wright’s comment placing him on the trip.<br />http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/us/politics/06obama.html<br /><br />Earlier I was convinced they convened in Tripoli Lebanon. But now I think they just broke the travel and embargo laws and went straight into Libya despite our complete break off of diplomatic relations. What balls. And what putzes we are for not throwing them in jail the moment we caught wind of it.<br />Bye for now.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-45047196874695440822011-02-28T10:00:07.226-04:002011-02-28T10:00:07.226-04:00"In ’84 Farrakhan and Wright went to Tripoli ..."In ’84 Farrakhan and Wright went to Tripoli and met with Qaddafi and the Muslim brotherhood."<br /><br />Wow! And your source for this assertion?Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-64833665248402021672011-02-28T09:15:30.467-04:002011-02-28T09:15:30.467-04:00O.K. I’ll dumb it down for the learning impaired.
...O.K. I’ll dumb it down for the learning impaired.<br /><br />a) “Do you dispute that Wright and Farrakhan traveled to Libya with Jesse Jackson to negotiate the release of Bobby Goodman? Are you claiming that's not true?”<br /><br />Yes, I refute this pile of convenient leftist thinking because:<br />1. No one went to Libya<br />Jackson went to Damascus in ’83, perhaps Wright was with him, Farrakhan was not.<br />2. In ’84 Farrakhan and Wright went to Tripoli and met with Qaddafi and the Muslim brotherhood.<br /><br /><br />b) “Do you dispute Ronald Reagan praised the mission, and Jesse Jackson?”<br /><br />Yes, I refute this manipulation as the Tripoli trip was obviously not praised by Reagan. Reagan praised Jackson for his mission to Damascus, with no mention of Wright, for the success.<br /><br />c)” Do you dispute the fact that the WND article ignored those rather important facts?”<br /><br />Yes. You have presented no facts.<br /><br />You sir, once again, stand refuted.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-79206113731155878092011-02-28T08:25:33.819-04:002011-02-28T08:25:33.819-04:00Sorry, hit "send" too soon.
Your specul...Sorry, hit "send" too soon.<br /><br />Your speculation about various trips to Tripoli is endlessly fascinating. But you're missing the point. Our host's original contention was that Obama is somehow "evil" for having once had a pastor who met Gadaffi. We have since established:<br />- that no less a conservative luminary than W. himself praised Gadaffi as a model for Arab Leaders<br />- several "good guys" met Gadaffi before and after Bush's praise, including Condoleeza Rice.<br /><br />So - our host's tenuous condemnation - backed by an article in a wretched crime against journalism by an author flogging his book - is silly.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-87086292136872835662011-02-28T08:20:00.270-04:002011-02-28T08:20:00.270-04:00A: And?
B: Italy is said to the world headquarter...A: And?<br /><br />B: Italy is said to the world headquarters of the Mafia. I guess my visit to the Vatican was ill advised. <br /><br />C: You have two "Cs".<br /><br />D: Heh. No, not even the ad for the book on the topic they're peddling, embedded right in the story. You don't take them seriously, do you?<br /><br />E: I don't take Wikipedia as the ultimate source for anything, dear boy. When interested, I follow the links to their original sources. I do consider them a vastly better source of information than the hallucinatory birther Bible WND, which is to politics what the old Weekly World News was to journalism.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-7478737349651843632011-02-28T08:13:11.019-04:002011-02-28T08:13:11.019-04:00My dear Squiggles: oh, now, don't be huffy. Ar...My dear Squiggles: oh, now, don't be huffy. Artistic form is inevitably derided by those who cannot achieve it. Keep trying, and remember how you get to Carnegie Hall. <br /><br />WV: Versetr.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-80667506595100322622011-02-28T07:44:50.631-04:002011-02-28T07:44:50.631-04:00Balbulican.
Serious stuff here:
A: Jackson trave...Balbulican. <br />Serious stuff here:<br /><br />A: Jackson traveled to Damascus in late '83 for Lt. Goodman. He had met with Syrian Pres. Assad before.<br /><br />B: Farrakhan and Wright went to Tripoli, on an unrelated trip in '84 (June, I think). Tripoli is HQ for the Muslim Brotherhood<br /><br />C: From the Wikipedia link we see, plainly, that there were two trips. Roland Martin, a Chicago based CNN contributor actually confirms this in an effort to lend Wright credibility. <br />“”, a lot of folks don't mention the fact that it was Reverend Wright who accompanied Reverend Jackson to get a Navy pilot, Goodman, out of Syria, who also was on that trip with Louis Farrakhan. Reagan praised that mercy mission for getting the pilot back.””<br />(The first sighted reference confirms nothing)<br />(Also, I found no confirmation in Jackson’s biography)<br />C: Reagan praised the Jackson mission, not the latter.<br /><br />D: WND omitted nothing.<br /><br />E: Wikipedia has never been a reliable source for politics or recent political history as it is open to alterations by anyone for any purpose. Well intended or not, things are often misrepresented.∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-38130809431810560892011-02-28T03:55:40.385-04:002011-02-28T03:55:40.385-04:00Bla-bla
What a kill joy. Your rule mongering is q...Bla-bla<br />What a kill joy. Your rule mongering is quite flawed but more importantly, entirely misses the point. First and foremost, the Limerick is pure entertainment; originally sung back and forth in a merry group with a refrain. Individuals taking the floor and receiving boos or cheers as a measure of success. These were not proffered to a professor sitting at his desk, how absurd that would be. <br />Canuck<br />I gather this is a boo. While Bla-bla suggests my limerick is marred by the very audience who reads it. I suggest that the phonemes of his moniker and himself are the flaw. There is no gem to recognize. As for the Dutch; Amsterdam is home of the world’s most famous brothels. This paired with their relaxed view of nudity inclined me to suggest that the gem of my limerick may be tits and attributed this as a symbol of the gem expert Dutch. (Shhhhhh! I think they have some knowledge about tits too.)<br /><br />In general<br />What nonsense. (If you don’t get that… can’t help you.)<br /><br />P.S. According to Wikipedia St. John has the oldest documented reference to “Limericks”∞ ≠ ønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-9753605105023510932011-02-27T18:25:01.794-04:002011-02-27T18:25:01.794-04:00Ah. Well, that's a query for Squiggles.Ah. Well, that's a query for Squiggles.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-80933536295247894642011-02-27T17:26:14.383-04:002011-02-27T17:26:14.383-04:00Never mind your silly debate, what about the Dutch...Never mind your silly debate, what about the Dutch tits thingy.Canuckguynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-36613349601324402932011-02-27T16:48:43.881-04:002011-02-27T16:48:43.881-04:00Well, considerably more accurate than WND, it woul...Well, considerably more accurate than WND, it would seem.<br /><br />However, in the interest of accuracy, please let me know which of the relevant facts cited in the Wikipedia article you actually dispute, and I will be glad to provide additional sources. <br /><br />a) Do you dispute that Wright and Farrakhan traveled to Libya with Jesse Jackson to negotiate the release of Bobby Goodman? Are you claiming that's not true?<br /><br />b) Do you dispute Ronald Reagan praised the mission, and Jesse Jackson?<br /><br />c) Do you dispute the fact that the WND article ignored those rather important facts?<br /><br />Let me know which of those you disagree with, and I'll be happy to provide further links.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-36049529158906028662011-02-27T16:26:01.932-04:002011-02-27T16:26:01.932-04:00Hmm.
Soooo Wikipedia is a reliable source, in you...Hmm.<br /><br />Soooo Wikipedia is a reliable source, in youse guys' opinion?<br /><br />Ah...Canadian Sentinelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04255833874079591126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16604508.post-61801223575727803392011-02-27T16:16:14.595-04:002011-02-27T16:16:14.595-04:00Funny, World Net Daily completely failed to mentio...Funny, World Net Daily completely failed to mention that.Balbulicanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909755014063452689noreply@blogger.com